SMART EDUCATORS FOR DIGITAL AGE STUDENTS

Authors

  • Nurul Fauziyyah Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v25i1.3467

Keywords:

Smart educators, Digital age students, Education, Industry 4.0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to review the shifting paradigm of educators that should be adjusted to the development and needs of the current generations or in other words educators must be smart to digital age students. This study was conducted by previous studies and associated with the facts that occur at this time or also known as a literature study. The data analysis method used in this study is descriptive analysis method. Results showed that the root reason to shift the old paradigm in education system is not just about technology, but it tends to the needs of ‘new environment’ in learning process for digital age students. Having good skill in technology is a must, but smart educators have greater challange to interprate that skill to create an interesting learning process to absorb the best result from the education system. That is why educators have to shift the old paradigm in education system. Educators have to improve their creativity to create an enjoyable class to attract students’ attention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Autry, Alex J. and Zane Berge. 2011. “Digital natives and digital immigrants: getting to know each other”. Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 43 No. 7, pp. 460-466.
Chaves, et.al. 2016. “Education in times net generation: how digital immigrants can teach digital natives?”. HOLOS, Year 32, Vol. 2.
Crook, C. 2016. “The discourse of a 'smart' technology: implications for educational practice”. International Journal of Smart Technology and Learning, 1(1), 4-20.
Fauziyyah, N. 2019.” The potential of augmented reality to transform education into smart education: a review”. Jurnal PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran), 3(4), 966-973. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v3i4.7433.
Gaston, J. 2006. “Reaching and teaching the digital natives”. Library HiTech News, Vol. 23 No.3, pp. 12-13.
Herther, N.K. (2009). Digital natives and immigrants, cover story. Online,Vol.33 No.6, p.14.
Hwang, G. J. 2014. “Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments- a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective”. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 4.
Jones, C., et.al. 2010. “Net generation or digital natives: is there a distinct new generation entering university?”. Computers and Education, 54, 722-732.
Kennedy, g., Judd, t., Churchward, a., Gray, k., Krause. 2008. “First year students’ experiences with technology: are they digital natives?”. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 24, p.108-122.
Kiryakova, Gabriela, et.al. 2018. “The Potential of augmented reality to transform education into smart education”. TEM Journal, Vol. 7, Issue 3, Pages 556-565.
Marchetta, James, et.al. 2018. “Preferences and learning behaviors of digital natives”. Northeast Business & Economics Association Proceedings 2018.
Prenksy, M. 2001. “Digital natives, digital immigrants”. On the Horizon,Vol.9 No.5, pp.1-6.
Teo, T. 2013. “An initial development and validation of a digital natives assessment scale (DNAS)”. Computers & Education Journal, vol. 67, pp. 51-57, 2013.
Wan Jusoh and Ahmad. 2016. “iMindMap as an innovative tool in teaching and learning accounting: an exploratory study”. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 71-82.
Zhu, Z. T., Yu, M. H., and Riezebos, P. 2016. “A research framework of smart education”. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1).

Downloads

Published

2020-06-15

How to Cite

Fauziyyah, N. (2020). SMART EDUCATORS FOR DIGITAL AGE STUDENTS. INSANIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 25(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v25i1.3467

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 31 32 33 34 35 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.