Analisis Keterbacaan Buku English for Nusantara untuk Kelas Tujuh Menggunakan WebFX
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v28i1a.8480Kata Kunci:
English for Nusantara, readability, The WebFXAbstrak
Buku English for Nusantara (EN) adalah buku teks yang disediakan oleh pemerintah Indonesia dan menjadi buku ajar yang dapat digunakan guru untuk kegiatan belajar mengajar bahasa Inggris di sekolah menengah pertama di Indonesia. Sebelum menggunakannya, guru harus mengevaluasi tingkat keterbacaanya karena buku ajar dengan tingkat keterbacaan yang rendah dapat menurunkan motivasi siswa dalam belajar dan memungkinkan mereka untuk tidak dapat mencapai tujuan belajar mengajar yang maksimal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi keterbacaan EN. Menggunakan sampel EN untuk kelas tujuh, penelitian ini membawa pertanyaan penelitian berupa bagaimana tingkat keterbacaan buku ajar English for Nusantara. Untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut, peneliti menggunakan pendekatan studi kualitatif. Peneliti menggunakan alat keterbacaan gratis bernama WebFX yang diakses secara daring untuk mengukur tingkat keterbacaan teks dalam buku ajar tersebut. Di antara teks EN untuk kelas tujuh, peneliti mengambil 18 teks dan menganalisisnya menggunakan rumus pengukuran pada alat tersebut. Studi ini menemukan bahwa tingkat keterbacaannya dari teks-teks yang ada dalam buku ajar tersebut tinggi, sehingga teks mudah dibaca. Keterbatasan penelitian dan saran untuk penelitian masa depan juga dibahas.Unduhan
Referensi
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Cárcamo Morales, B. (2020). Readability and types of questions in Chilean EFL high school textbooks. TESOL Journal, 11(2), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.498 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.498
Coleman, M., & Liau, T. L. (1975). A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 283–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076540
Council of Europe. (2023). Global scale - Table 1 (CEFR 3.3): Common reference levels. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/table-1-cefr-3.3-common-reference-levels-global-scale
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Crossley, S. a., Greenfield, J., & Mcnamara, D. s. (2008). Assessing text readability using cognitively based indices. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00142.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00142.x
Damayanti, I. L., Nurlaelawati, I., Febrianti, Y., Prihartanti, P., Fellani, A. J., & Rahmadhani, R. (2022). English for Nusantara untuk SMP/MTs Kelas VII. Pusat Perbukuan Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
DuBay, W. H. (2004). The principles of readability. In The principles of readability. Impact Information. http://www.impact-information.com/impactinfo/readability02.pdf
Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057532
Gómez, P. C., & Sánchez-Lafuente, Á. A. (2019). Readability indices for the assessment of textbooks: A feasibility study in the context of EFL. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16, 31–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35869/vial.v0i16.92 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35869/vial.v0i16.92
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195564 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195564
Greenfield, J. (2004). Readability Formulas For EFL. JALT Journal, 26(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.37546/jaltjj26.1-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ26.1-1
Hakim, A. A., Setyaningsih, E., & Cahyaningrum, D. (2021). Examining the readability level of reading texts in English textbook for Indonesian senior high school. Journal of English Language Studies, 6(1), 18-35. https://doi.org/10.30870/jels.v6i1.8898 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30870/jels.v6i1.8898
Handayani, R., Furaidah, F., & Ivone, F. M. (2021). The readability level of reading texts in erlangga straight point series: English for eleventh grade students. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 5(11), 1579-1587. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i11.14168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i11.14168
Johan, A. N., Mujiyanto, J., Fitriati, S. W., & Hartono, R. (2022). The analysis of speech acts in "English for Nusantara" textbook. International Conference on Science, Education and Technology, 137–141. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/ISET/article/view/1740
Kasule, D. (2011). Textbook readability and ESL learners. Reading & Writing, 2(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v2i1.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v2i1.13
Kemdikbud. (2022). Buku Saku Tanya Jawab Kurikulum Merdeka. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kim, D., & Hall, J. K. (2002). The role of an interactive book reading program in the development of second language pragmatic competence. The Modern Language Journal, 86(3), 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00153
Kodom, G. W., & Pearl, S. D. (2019). Readability of English language textbooks for diploma students of the University of Cape Coast. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 8(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2019.3008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2019.3008
Kotani, K., & Yoshimi, T. (2011). A machine learning approach to measurement of text readability for EFL learners using various linguistic features. US-China Education Review B, 6, 767–777. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529383.pdf
Lee, B. W., & Hyung-Jong, J. (2020). LXPER Index: A curriculum-specific text readability assessment model for EFL students in Korea. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110801 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110801
Mahadini, M. K., Setyaningsih, E., & Sarosa, T. (2021). Using conventional rubric and Coh-Metrix to assess EFL 'students' essays. International Journal of Language Education, 5(4), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i4.19105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i4.19105
Mason, A. M., Compton, J., & Bhati, S. (2021). Disabilities and the digital divide: Assessing web accessibility, readability, and mobility of popular health websites. Journal of Health Communication, 26(10), 667–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1987591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1987591
Mesmer, H. A. E. (2005). Introduction: Text accessibility and the struggling reader. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560590523603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560590523603
Mohebbi, H., Nayernia, A., Nemati, M., & Mohebbi, B. (2017). Readability of ESP Textbooks in Iran: A Neglected Issue or a Taken-for-Granted One?. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 4(3), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1603641M
Morgan, A., Wilcox, B. R., & Eldredge, J. L. (2000). Effect of difficulty levels on second-grade delayed readers using dyad reading. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(2), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598749 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598749
Namaziandost, E., Esfahani, F. R., & Ahmadi, S. (2019). Varying levels of difficulty in L2 reading materials in the EFL classroom: Impact on comprehension and motivation. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1615740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1615740
Niazifar, A., & Shakibaei, G. (2019). Effects of different text difficulty levels on Iranian EFL 'learners' foreign language Reading motivation and Reading comprehension. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 4(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-019-0070-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-019-0070-x
Odo, D. M. (2018). A comparison of readability and understandability in second language acquisition textbooks for pre-service EFL teachers. Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(3), 750–765. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.3.12.750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.3.12.750
Oydanich, M., Kuklinski, E., & Asbell, P. A. (2022). Assessing the quality, reliability, and readability of online information on dry eye disease. Cornea, 41(8), 1023–1028. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003034
Rakt, M. V. D. (2019). The Flesch reading ease score: why and how to use it. Yoast SEO.
Rubdy, R. (2014). Selection of materials. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Developing Materials for Language Teaching (2nd ed., pp. 37–85). Bloomsbury Academic.
Sawyer, E. (2022, 1 February ). Comparing the US & UK education systems. Relocate Global. https://www.relocatemagazine.com/reeditor-09-d3-2015-7523-comparing-the-us-and-uk-education-systems
Solnyshkina, M. I., Zamaletdinov, R. R., Gorodetskaya, L. A., & Gabitov, A. I. (2017). Evaluating Text Complexity and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 8(3), 238–248. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1162266.pdf
The WebFX. (n.d.). Readability tools. The WebFX. Retrieved May 29, 2023, from https://www.webfx.com/tools/read-able/
Zamanian, M., & Heydari, P. (2012). Readability of texts: State of the art. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.1.43-53 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.1.43-53
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2023 Basori
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative CommonsAttribution-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
