Analysis of differential interests: A quantitative approach to learning method preferences between religious-nonreligious and institutes-universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v29i1.10910Kata Kunci:
education revolution, higher education, students satisfaction, teaching methodsAbstrak
This study endeavors to scrutinize student contentment levels regarding pedagogical approaches utilized by educators amidst the backdrop of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, with a particular emphasis on students categorized by their fields of study and institutional affiliations. Data were collated from 123 student participants drawn from diverse universities within the Province of Jambi. This research used a structured online questionnaire to acquire data in employing a quantitative methodology. Data analysis involved the utilization of a Likert scale to gauge the degree of student satisfaction. Assumption testing was used to analyze the Likert scale. In this study, assumption testing using independent sample t-tests, also viewed through the acquisition of proportion values, was used to determine how differences in satisfaction levels were found. Findings reveal noteworthy student satisfaction concerning instructional methodologies, notably in punctuality, subject matter proficiency, instructional delivery, and assessment and evaluation procedures. Moreover, evaluating instructor performance, as perceived by students vis-à-vis their respective majors and institutional statuses, substantially impacts satisfaction levels with pedagogical strategies across various facets of the learning process. The cumulative average significance of overall satisfaction with instructional methodologies among students enrolled in universities within Jambi. Nonetheless, areas necessitating enhancement, such as evaluation and assessment practices, alongside fostering emotional rapport between students and instructors, are underscored as imperative for promoting an optimal learning environment.Referensi
Abdel-Basset, M., Manogaran, G., Mohamed, M., & Rushdy, E. (2019). Internet of things in smart education environment: Supportive framework in the decision-making process. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 31(10), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4515
Adiyono, A., Fadhilatunnisa, A., Rahmat, N. A., & Munawarroh, N. (2022). Skills of Islamic Religious Education Teachers in Class Management. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 6(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v6i1.229
Ahmed, K. K., Al-Jumaili, A. A., Salman, S. S., & Kathem, S. H. (2021). The 'Students' Experience of Hybrid- Education Model at the University of Baghdad College of Pharmacy: Lessons and Future Directions. Iraqi Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 30(2), 269-277. https://doi.org/10.31351/vol30iss2pp269-277
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
Al-Rahmi, A. M., Shamsuddin, A., Wahab, E., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alturki, U., Aldraiweesh, A., & Almutairy, S. A. (2022). Integrating the Role of UTAUT and TTF Model to Evaluate Social Media Use for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.905968
Al-Rahmi, A. M., Shamsuddin, A., Wahab, E., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alyoussef, I. Y., & Crawford, J. (2022). Social media use in higher education: Building a structural equation model for student satisfaction and performance. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1003007
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Al-Adwan, A. S., Al-Maatouk, Q., Othman, M. S., Almogren, A. S., & Al-Rahmi, A. M. (2023). Integrating Communication and Task–Technology Fit Theories: The Adoption of Digital Media in Learning. Sustainability, 15(10), 8144. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108144
Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during Covid-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 5261-5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
Ausat, A. M. A. (2022). Positive Impact of The Covid-19 Pandemic on The World of Education. Jurnal Pendidikan, 23(2), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.33830/jp.v23i2.3048.2022
Ardiansyah, M., & Nugraha, M. L. (2021). Analisis Empiris: Solusi Perkuliahan Di Era Normal Baru. Research and Development Journal of Education, 7(1), 182-192. https://doi.org/10.30998/rdje.v7i1.7965
Ayhan, D., & Seki Öz, H. (2021). Effect of assertiveness training on the nursing 'students' assertiveness and self-esteem levels: Application of hybrid education in COVID-19 pandemic. Nurs Forum, 56(4), 807-815. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12610
Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of 'students' perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID19. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(3), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.20448/JOURNAL.509.2020.73.285.292
Bali, S., & Liu, M. C. (2018). 'Students' perceptions toward online learning and face-to-face learning courses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108, 12094. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012094
Bautista, A., & Yang, W. (2023). Learning Satisfaction with Online Teaching Video Cases Among Pre-Service Preschool Teachers in China. Early Education and Development, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2023.2214163
Becker, S. P., Luebbe, A. M., Kofler, M. J., Burns, G. L., & Jarrett, M. A. (2023). ADHD, chronotype, and circadian preference in a multi-site sample of college students. Journal of Sleep Research, e13994–e13994. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13994
Berndt, A. E. (2020). Sampling methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(2), 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334420906
Brasel, K., Haider, A., & Haukoos, J. (2020). Practical guide to survey research. JAMA Surgery, 155(4), 351–352. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4401
Chan, C. K. Y., & Wong, H. Y. H. (2023). 'Students' perception of written, audio, video and face-to-face reflective approaches for holistic competency development. Active Learning in Higher Education, 24(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874211054449
Costa, A. N., McGovney, K., Rzeppa, C., McCrae, C. S., & Curtis, A. F. (2023). 0054 Does the Early Bird Get the Worm? Associations of Waketime Variability and Metacognition in College Students. Sleep, 46(Supplement_1), A26–A26. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsad077.0054
Darling-Hammond, S., Ruiz, M., Eberhardt, J. L., & Okonofua, J. A. (2023). The dynamic nature of student discipline and discipline disparities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120(17), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120417120
de Lima, A. C. B., dos Santos, D. C. M., de Almeida, S. L., da Silva, E. L., & e Pereira, E. B. F. (2022). Hybrid education in healthcare education : a systematic review. Revista Cuidarte, 13(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.2051
Dennis, M. J. (2020). The impact of COVID ‐19 on the world economy and higher education . Enrollment Management Report. https://doi.org/10.1002/emt.30720
Djeki, E., Dégila, J., Bondiombouy, C., & Alhassan, M. H. (2022). E-learning bibliometric analysis from 2015 to 2020. Journal of Computers in Education, 9, 727-754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00218-4
El Refae, G. A., Kaba, A., & Eletter, S. (2021). Distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic: satisfaction, opportunities and challenges as perceived by faculty members and students. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0128
Escueta, M., Nickow, A. J., Oreopoulos, P., & Quan, V. (2020). Upgrading education with technology: Insights from experimental research. In Journal of Economic Literature, 58, 4, 897–996. https://doi.org/10.1257/JEL.20191507
Ferrante, G. R., Goldin, A. P., Sigman, M., & Leone, M. J. (2023). A better alignment between chronotype and school timing is associated with lower grade retention in adolescents. Npj Science of Learning, 8(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-023-00171-0
Flensner, K. K. (2020). Teaching Controversial Issues in Diverse Religious Education Classrooms. Religions, 11(9), 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11090465
Gasser, L., Grütter, J., Buholzer, A., & Wettstein, A. (2018). Emotionally supportive classroom interactions and 'students' perceptions of their teachers as caring and just. Learning and Instruction, 54, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.08.003
Gherheș, V., Stoian, C. E., Fărcașiu, M. A., & Stanici, M. (2021). E-learning vs. face-to-face learning: Analyzing 'students' preferences and behaviors. Sustainability, 13(8), 4381. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084381
Hehir, E., Zeller, M., Luckhurst, J., & Chandler, T. (2021). Developing student connectedness under remote learning using digital resources: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6531–6548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10577-1
Hodge, S. R. (2020). Quantitative research. In Routledge Handbook of Adapted Physical Education (pp. 147–162). Routledge.
Hsu, C.-Y., Horikoshi, I., Li, H., Majumdar, R., & Ogata, H. (2023). Supporting time awarenessin self-regulated learning: How do students allocate time during exam preparation? Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00243-z
Hwang, G.-J., Yang, C.-L., Chou, K. R., & Chang, C. Y. (2022). An MDRE approach to promoting 'students' learning performances in the era of the pandemic: A quasi‐experimental design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1706–1723. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13208
Islam, M. R., Sarker, R., Sultana, R., Faisal-E-Alam, M., Castanho, R. A., & Meyer, D. (2023). Understanding the COVID-19 ' 'Pandemic's Impact on E-Learner Satisfaction at the Tertiary Level. Sustainability, 15(8), 6694. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086694
Kapoor, H., Inamdar, V., & Kaufman, J. C. (2021). I 'Didn't Have Time! A Qualitative Exploration of Misbehaviors in Academic Contexts. Journal of Academic Ethics, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10805-021-09407-3
Kay, R., MacDonald, T., & DiGiuseppe, M. (2019). A comparison of lecture-based, active, and flipped classroom teaching approaches in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(3), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12528-018-9197-X
Kent, R. (2020). Data construction and data analysis for survey research. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-08944-1
Li, F. (2018). The expansion of higher education and the returns of distance education in China. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(4), 242-256. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.2881
Li, J.-B., Bi, S. S., Willems, Y. E., Willems, Y. E., & Finkenauer, C. (2021). The Association Between School Discipline and Self-Control From Preschoolers to High School Students: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis: Review of Educational Research, 91(1), 73–111. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320979160
Louis-Jean, J., & Cenat, K. (2020). Beyond the face-to-face learning: a contextual analysis. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/8466
Martin, F., Chen, Y., Moore, R. L., & Westine, C. D. (2020). Systematic review of adaptive learning research designs, context, strategies, and technologies from 2009 to 2018. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1903–1929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09793-2
Muzammil, M., Sutawijaya, A., & Harsasi, M. (2020). Investigating student satisfaction in online learning: the role of student interaction and engagement in distance learning university. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(Special Issue-IODL), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770928
Nascimento, G. P. V, Moreira, D. C., & Welker, A. F. (2019). A controlled study on an instrument that couples active learning with technology: student video creation. F1000Research, 8, 1107. https://doi.org/10.12688/F1000RESEARCH.19645.1
Ngoc, H. D., Hoang, L. H., & Hung, V. X. (2020). Transforming education with emerging technologies in higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(5), 252-258. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n5p252
Nielsen, K. B., & Ulriksen, L. (2021). Following rhythms and changing pace–'Students' strategies in relation to time in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1940926
Nordmann, E., Clark, A. M., Spaeth, E., & MacKay, J. R. D. (2021). Lights, camera, active! appreciation of active learning predicts positive attitudes towards lecture capture. Higher Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10734-020-00674-4
Nur, M., Utomo, Y., Sudaryanto, M., & Saddhono, K. (2020). Ingénierie des Systèmes d' Information Tools and Strategy for Distance Learning to Respond COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. International Information and Engineering Technology Associaton, 25(3), 383–390. https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.250314
Okoye, K., Rodriguez-Tort, J. A., Escamilla, J., & Hosseini, S. (2021). Technology-mediated teaching and learning process: A conceptual study of 'educators' response amidst the Covid-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-021-10527-X
Pandita, A., & Kiran, R. (2023). The Technology Interface and Student Engagement Are Significant Stimuli in Sustainable Student Satisfaction. Sustainability, 15(10), 7923. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107923
Pattier, D., & Ferreira, P. D. (2023). Face-to-face, online or hybrid?: Perceptions and preferences by higher education teachers and students. Revista Complutense de Educacion, 34(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.76766
Petchamé, J., Iriondo, I., Korres, O., & Paños-Castro, J. (2023). Digital transformation in higher education: A qualitative evaluative study of a hybrid virtual format using a smart classroom system. Heliyon, 9(6), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16675
Pownall, M. (2021). Encouraging Feminist Discussion in Asynchronous Online Teaching. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 46(1), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211027479
Priess-Buchheit, J. (2020). Synchronous hybrid learning in times of social distancing A report and case study on benefits, ' 'trainer's challenges, and guidelines. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 8(10), 356–364. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol8.iss10.2689
Rodgers, J. L. (2020). Teaching Statistics and Quantitative Methods in the 21st Century. Routledge.
Romaniuk, M. W., & Łukasiewicz-Wieleba, J. (2022). Hybrid Education in Higher Education on the Example of 'Students' Experiences in Post-pandemic Reality. International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, 68(3), 497-504. https://doi.org/10.24425/ijet.2022.141266
Roni, S. M., Merga, M. K., & Morris, J. E. (2020). Conducting quantitative research in education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9132-3
Rulandari, N. (2020). The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on the World of Education in Indonesia. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 1(4), 242-250. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijss.v1i4.174
Smarr, B. L., Ishami, A. L., & Schirmer, A. E. (2021). Lower variability in female students than male students at multiple timescales supports the use of sex as a biological variable in human studies. Biology of Sex Differences, 12(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13293-021-00375-2
Susilawati, S., Aprilianti, D., & Asbari, M. (2022). The Role of Islamic Religious Education in Forming the Religious Character of Students. Journal of Information Systems and Management (JISMA), 1(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4444/jisma.v1i1.1
Terzieva, V., Ilchev, S., & Todorova, K. (2022). The Role of Internet of Things in Smart Education. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(11), 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.08.057
Tomesko, J., Cohen, D., & Bridenbaugh, J. R. (2022). Using a virtual flipped classroom model to promote critical thinking in online graduate courses in the United States: a case presentation. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 19, 5. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2022.19.5
Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 158(1), S65–S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Dzikril Ikhsan, Ahmad Jamin, Albertos Damni
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative CommonsAttribution-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
