Comparative study of arabic learning materials in traditional and modern pondok pesantren in North Sumatera, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v28i1.6929Keywords:
Arabic Material, traditional pondok pesantren, modern pondok pesantrenAbstract
This study aims to compare the Arabic materials in the traditional Pondok Pesantren Al-Ansor and the Pondok Pesantren Al-Hasyimiyah Darul Ulum in North Sumatera. It is qualitative descriptive and comparative field research. Observation, interviews, and documentation were utilized to collect data for this study. This study's validity is examined using a triangulation of data sources. Data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion are the three phases of the data analysis technique. This study’s data analysis is inductive, with the researcher actively seeking for data, examining, analyzing, interpreting, and deriving conclusions from the observed phenomena. This study indicates that traditional Pondok Pesantren Al-Ansor and Pondok Pesantren Al-Hasyimiyah Darul Ulum Arabic language learning materials have similarities and differences. In the form of qawā’id, the material aspect of anāśir al-lugah is comparable. The distinction is whether the Arabic material is taught through a program or not, and the learning outcomes that result. The Arabic language material on the mufradāt and aṣwāt learning aspects are not explicitly stated in the learning program at Pondok Pesantren Al-Ansor as a traditional pondok pesantren, but the qawaid learning material aspect is the primary focus at Ponpes Al-Ansor. In terms of mufradāt and aṣwāt learning materials, Pondok Pesantren Al-Hasyimiyah produces students with superior kalām and istimā’ skills. The qawā’id material aspect, meanwhile, is not a priority program because learning is limited to what is in the textbook.Downloads
References
Aflisia, N., Hendrianto, E.Q, N. A., & Suhartini, A. (2022). Komparasi Pembelajaran Nahwu di Pesantren dan Madrasah. Al-Fathin: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Arab, 5(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.32332/al-fathin.v5i01.4231
Afriansyah. (2018). Studi Komparasi Metode Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab dan Hasil Belajar Bahasa Arab di Pondok Pesantren Modern dan Tradisional Kabupaten Jambi. Himmah: Jurnal Kajian Islam Kontemporer, 2(1), 135–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.47313/jkik.v2i1-2.490
Ainin, M., Ahsanuddin, M., Asrori, I., & Ibrahim, F. M. A. (2020). Designing Online-Based Independent Learning Network for the Development of Arabic Language Research Methodology (ALRM) at State University of Malang, Indonesia. Journal Education and E-Learning Research, 7(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.71.7.14
Al-Rawafi, A., Sudana, D., Lukmana, I., & Syihabuddin, S. (2021). Students’ apologizing in Arabic and English: An interlanguage pragmatic case study at an Islamic boarding school in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 589–602. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i3.31740
Aljojo, N. (2016). Difficulties in adapting feedback for individual learning styles in the Arabic Teacher Assisting an Subject Adaptive Material (TASAM) system. International Journal of Management in Education, 10(3), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2016.077510
Annova, F., & Rehani. (2022). Konsep Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Bahasa Arab bagi Pembelajar di Indonesia. Alibba’: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 3(2), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.19105/ajpba.v3i2.6228
Arifin, Z., Hania, I., Sofa, F., Utami, S., & Nurinadia, P. (2022). The Development of CEFR-Based Nahwu and Shorof Learning Evaluation in Madrasah Aliyah in Cirebon. Izdihar: Journal of Arabic Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 5(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.22219/jiz.v5i2.21610
Arikunto, S. (2021). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.
Habibi, B. Y. (2019). Integrasi Kurikulum Bahasa Arab Pesantren Tradisional dan Modern di Madrasah Aliyah Program Keagamaan. Arabi : Journal of Arabic Studies, 4(2), 151–167. http://doi.org/10.24865/ajas.v4i2.178
Hamid, M. A. (2008). Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab, Pendekatan, Metode, Strategi, Materi, dan Media. UIN-Maliki Press.
Hania, I., & Suteja. (2021). Pendidikan Islam Perspektif Al-Ghazali dan Ibn Rusyd serta Relevansinya di Abad 21. Heutagogia: Journal of Islamic Education, 1(2), 121–130. http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/tarbiyah/HJIE/article/view/4667
Isbah, M. F. (2020). Pesantren in The Changing Indonesian Context: History and Current Developments. Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies, 8(1), 65–106. https://doi.org/10.21043/QIJIS.V8I1.5629
Junaidi, K. (2016). Sistem Pendidikan Pondok Pesantren di Indonesia (Suatu Kajian Sistem Kurikulum di Pondok Pesantren Lirboyo). Istawa: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(2), 95–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.24269/ijpi.v2i1.364
Koderi. (2019). Developing mobile learning media for arabic language instruction at islamic senior high scholl in Lampung Indonesia. International Journal of Recent Technology an Engineering, 8(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.b1024.0982S919
Makruf, I., & Barokah, A. (2020). Peningkatan Mutu Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Berbasis Aktivitas Di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Al Mahāra: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 6(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.14421/almahara.2020.061.03
Mu’izzuddin, M. (2020). Model Desain Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Media Edukasi Indonesia.
Mubarok, M. H. (2018). Metode Pembelajaran Shorof di Pondok Pesantren Sukahideng, Sukarame, Kabupaten Tasikmalaya. THORIQOTUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.47971/tjpi.v1i2.107
Mujamil, Q. (2018). Pesantren dari Transformasi Metodologi Menuju Demokrasi Intuisi. Erlangga.
Nurhalim, M. (2018). Analisis Perkembangan Kurikulum di Indonesia (Sebuah Tinjauan Desain dan Pendekatan). Insania: Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 16(3), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v16i3.1597
Pane, A. (2017). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Fitrah: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 3(2), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v3i2.945
Saputro, H., & Suharto, T. (2022). Analisis Komparasi terhadap Pengajaran Keterampilan Berbicara antara Bahasa Arab dan Bahasa Inggris. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling, 4(3), 2274–2281. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v4i3.5060
Sauri, S. (2020). Sejarah Perkembangan Bahasa Arab dan Lembaga Islam di Indonesia. Insancita: Journal of Islamic Studies in Indonesia and Southeast Asia, 5(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.2121/incita-jisisea.v5i1.1332.g1159
Sumardi, K. (2012). Potret Pendidikan Karakter di Pondok Pesantren Salafiah. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 3(3), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v0i3.1246
Suteja. (2016). Pendidikan Dan Pesantren. CV. Elsi Pro.
Tahir, S. Z. B. (2017). Multilingual teaching and learning at Pesantren Schools in Indonesia. Asian EFL Journal, 98, 74–94. https://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/handle/10535/10267
Nurdianto, T., & Ismail, N. A. B. (2020). Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Berbasis Common European Framework of Reference For Language (CEFR) di Indonesia. Al Mahāra: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 6(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14421/almahara.2020.061.01
Zarkasyi, A. S. (2015). Gontor & Pembaharuan Pendidikan Pesantren. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Cecep Farhani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative CommonsAttribution-ShareAlike License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).