Persepsi Para Mubaligh Terhadap Wacana Kontroversi Standardisasi Khatib dan Sertifikasi Mubaligh
(Studi Terhadap Para Mubaligh di Banyumas)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v11i2.1367Keywords:
Standardization of Preacher, Mubaligh Sertification, Government, Public FigureAbstract
Today, there is a discourse of controversy that disturbs society, especially the muballigh and khatib related to the discourse of standardization of preachers and muballigh certification. Controversy on the discourse of standardization of preachers and certification of muballigh occurred between the government and some circles including the leaders and the mosque or mosque official. On the one hand, the government states that certification of muballigh and standardization of khatib is very necessary and important to do. While on the other hand a number of figures refuse the certification of muballigh and standardization of preacher. From the above background can be formulated “How is the perception of the Muballigh in Banyumas against the controversy of khatib standardization and certification of muballigh? “How are the hopes of the muballigh in Banyumas related to the controversy of khatib standardization and muballigh certification? The type of research used in this study is a qualitative research that is a research procedure that produces deksriptif data in the form of written or oral words of the people and behavior that can be observed. The research method used in this research is descriptive qualitative method. The method of data analysis used in this study is the method of data analysis by Mile and Huberman. The results of this study include: a) Views that support adanyba khatib standardization and certification of preachers with records starting with the training and get a salary from the government. b). Views that reject the standardization of preachers and certification preachers. Both terms are deemed inaccurate and more precisely is the formation of forums silaturrahim between preachers and preachers in which is filled with sharing sharing about the problems of preachers and the public. c). Alternative view is to provide a new alternative by empowering the existing religious counselors within the ministry of religion to accompany the preachers or form forum silaturrohim between preachers and preachers. While the expectations of the preachers to the controversy of standardization of preachers and certification of preachers are as follows: a). For preachers to improve their competence so that the goal to give the enlightenment of reason and conscience can be realized. b). For preachers in lectures not to vilify other groups, enlarge khilafiyah and not anti Pancasila and constitution 45.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Anam, S. (2017, Juli 25). Standardisasi Khatib dan Sertifikasi Mubaligh. (Arsam, Interviewer).
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2007). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Kabar24. (2017, 02 06). Kabar24. Retrieved 03 11, 2017, from Bisnis.com: http://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20170206/15/626268/kontroversisertifikasi-khatib-terus-bergulir
Merdeka, S. (2017, Februari 7). Solusi Standardisasi Khatib. Suara Merdeka. Semarang, Jawa Tengah: Suara Merdeka.
Moleong, L. J. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyana, D. (2009). Ilmu Komunikasi (suatu Pengantar). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyana, J. D. (1997). Human Communication (Komunikasi Antar Manusia). Jakarta: Professional Books.
Muridan. (2017, Juli 15). Standardisasi Khatib dan Sertifikasi Mubaligh. (Arsam, Interviewer).
Musta’in. (2017, Juli 25). Standardisasi Khatib dan Sertifikasi Mubaligh. (Arsam, Interviewer).
Najib, H. (2017, Juli 23). Standardisasi Khatib dan Sertifikasi Mubaligh. (Arsam, Interviewer).
Nurfuadi. (2017, Juli 25). Standardisasi Khatib dan Sertifikasi Mubaligh. (Arsam, Interviewer).
Rahmat, J. (2009). Ilmu Komunikasi (Suatu Pengantar). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Risalah. (2017, Februari 7). Pro Kontra Sertifikasi Mubaligh. Risalah. Jawa Tengah: Risalah.
Riswandi. (2009). Ilmu Komunikasi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
sangpencerah.id. (2017, 02). Sang Pencerah. Retrieved 03 10, 2017, from Sang Pencerah: http://sangpencerah.id/2017/02/muhammadiyahsertifikasi-khatib-Jum’at-menimbulkan-keresahan-ummat-Islam.html
Subur. (2017, Juli 25). Standardisasi Khatib dan Sertifikasi Mubaligh. (Arsam, Interviewer).
Sugiyono. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Uswatussholihah, U. (2017, Juli 25). Standardisasi Khatib dan Sertifikasi Mubaligh. (Arsam, Interviewer).
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2007). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Kabar24. (2017, 02 06). Kabar24. Retrieved 03 11, 2017, from Bisnis.com: http://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20170206/15/626268/kontroversisertifikasi-khatib-terus-bergulir
Merdeka, S. (2017, Februari 7). Solusi Standardisasi Khatib. Suara Merdeka. Semarang, Jawa Tengah: Suara Merdeka.
Moleong, L. J. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyana, D. (2009). Ilmu Komunikasi (suatu Pengantar). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyana, J. D. (1997). Human Communication (Komunikasi Antar Manusia). Jakarta: Professional Books.
Muridan. (2017, Juli 15). Standardisasi Khatib dan Sertifikasi Mubaligh. (Arsam, Interviewer).
Musta’in. (2017, Juli 25). Standardisasi Khatib dan Sertifikasi Mubaligh. (Arsam, Interviewer).
Najib, H. (2017, Juli 23). Standardisasi Khatib dan Sertifikasi Mubaligh. (Arsam, Interviewer).
Nurfuadi. (2017, Juli 25). Standardisasi Khatib dan Sertifikasi Mubaligh. (Arsam, Interviewer).
Rahmat, J. (2009). Ilmu Komunikasi (Suatu Pengantar). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Risalah. (2017, Februari 7). Pro Kontra Sertifikasi Mubaligh. Risalah. Jawa Tengah: Risalah.
Riswandi. (2009). Ilmu Komunikasi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
sangpencerah.id. (2017, 02). Sang Pencerah. Retrieved 03 10, 2017, from Sang Pencerah: http://sangpencerah.id/2017/02/muhammadiyahsertifikasi-khatib-Jum’at-menimbulkan-keresahan-ummat-Islam.html
Subur. (2017, Juli 25). Standardisasi Khatib dan Sertifikasi Mubaligh. (Arsam, Interviewer).
Sugiyono. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Uswatussholihah, U. (2017, Juli 25). Standardisasi Khatib dan Sertifikasi Mubaligh. (Arsam, Interviewer).
Downloads
Published
2018-04-13
How to Cite
Arsam, A. (2018). Persepsi Para Mubaligh Terhadap Wacana Kontroversi Standardisasi Khatib dan Sertifikasi Mubaligh: (Studi Terhadap Para Mubaligh di Banyumas). KOMUNIKA: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 11(2), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v11i2.1367
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).