Griefing emotions on Facebook wall: a visual multimodal dialogue from a semiotic technology perspective

Authors

  • Rulli Nasrullah Department of Islamic Broadcasting and Communication, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Study Rizal L. Kontu Department of Islamic Broadcasting and Communication, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Murodi Department of Islamic Broadcasting and Communication, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Jumroni Department of Islamic Broadcasting and Communication, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Umi Musyarrofah Department of Islamic Broadcasting and Communication, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Wasono Adi Departement of Communication Science, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v19i2.13067

Keywords:

mourning, Grief, Social Media, Multimodal Dialogue, Emoticon

Abstract

The expression of grief has shifted from traditional face-to-face rituals to digital spaces. Social media provides features such as emojis, stickers, and GIFs, enabling users to express mourning visually and symbolically. This phenomenon illustrates how cultural and religious practices are transformed through technological mediation. The study aims to analyze how multimodal dialogue represents grief on Facebook and how meaning is constructed in digital mourning practices. The research applies a social semiotic approach with a semiotic technology method. Data were collected from grief-related posts and comments on the Facebook account @endah.sucipto. The analysis focused on two models of interaction: system–user and user–user. Each textual and visual element was examined through multimodal content analysis and interpreted using semiotic theory. The findings show that expressions of grief appear in three dominant forms: condolences, Qur’anic verses, and prayers for the deceased. Users also rely on emojis, reaction icons, stickers, and images to strengthen emotional expression. These multimodal practices integrate religious traditions and digital symbols, creating hybrid forms of mourning in online communities. Visual features such as GIFs and stickers are substitutes for nonverbal cues and add affective value to brief textual comments. This study contributes to communication and cultural studies by showing how social media functions as both a technological medium and a cultural arena. The results highlight the role of digital semiotics in rearticulating cultural symbols of grief. Future research may expand this inquiry by comparing digital mourning practices across platforms and cultural contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-rawi, A., & Al-rawi, A. (2016). Understanding the Social Media Audiences of Radio Stations. 6529(May). https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2016.1155298

Asrianto, I. D., & Rochimah, A. (2024). Followers’ Reception of Anies Baswedan’s Image on the @pinterpolitik Social Media Account. Komunika, 8(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v18i1.9267

Bakry, G. N., Nasrullah, R., & Shabana, A. (2022). Netspeak virtual ethnography as culture in the Kaskus virtual community. Plaridel, 19(1), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.52518/2022.19.1-05banash

Barnes, R., Mahar, D., Cockshaw, W., & Wong, I. (2018). Personality and online news commenting behaviours: uncovering the characteristics of those below the line. Media International Australia, 169(1), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X18798695

Bell, D. (2001). An Introduction to Cybercultures. In Cultural Studies. Routledge.

Bell, D. (2007). Cyberculture Theorists: Manuel Castells and Donna Haraway. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203357019

Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2004). Love Online, Emotions on the Internet.

Blanchard, A., & Horan, T. (1998). Virtual communities and social capital. Social Science Computer Review, 16(3), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443939801600306

Bogost, I., & Montfort, N. (2009). Platform Studies: Frequently Questioned Answers. Digital Arts and Culture, 12–15(December), 1–6.

Castells, M. (2001). The Internet Galaxy. Oxford University Press.

Cavalcante, A. (2018). Affect, emotion, and media audiences: the case of resilient reception. Media, Culture and Society, 40(8), 1186–1201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718781991

Clerici, C. A., Ferrari, A., Veneroni, L., Casiraghi, G., Giacon, B., Armiraglio, M., & Massimino, M. (2012). At least we can send some flowers. Tumori, 98(5), 146–148. https://doi.org/10.1700/1190.13218

Crystal, D. (2004). Language and the Internet. Cambridge University Press.

Day, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. In Journal of the American Society for Information Science (Vol. 50, Issue 8). https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(1999)50:8<730::aid-asi14>3.0.co;2-d

Djonov, E., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2017). The Power of Semiotic Software: A Critical Multimodal Perspective. In N. Dyer-Witheford & G. de Peuter (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 566–581). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131573

Gane, N., & Beer, D. (2008). New Media: The Key Concepts. Berg.

Ge-Stadnyk, J. (2021). Communicative functions of emoji sequences in the context of self-presentation: A comparative study of Weibo and Twitter users. Discourse and Communication, 15(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211002038

Giannoulis, E., & Wilde, L. R. A. (Eds.). (2019). Emoticons, kaomoji, and emoji: The transformation of communication in the digital age. Routledge.

Gibbs, J. L., & Ellison, N. B. (2006). Self-Presentation in Online Personals. Cmc, 152–177.

Gibbs, M., Meese, J., Arnold, M., Nansen, B., & Carter, M. (2015). #Funeral and Instagram: death, social media, and platform vernacular. Information Communication and Society, 18(3), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152

Gotved, S. (2006). Time and space in cyber social reality. New Media & Society, 8(3), 467–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444806064484

Graham, S. (2004). The Cybercities Reader (Stephen Graham (Ed.)). Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. (2004). Introduction to Functional Grammar. Hodder Arnold. https://www.functionalmedicine.org/files/library/Intro_Functional_Medicine.pdf

Ilbury, C. (2022). Discourses of social media amongst youth: An ethnographic perspective. Discourse, Context and Media, 48(November 2021), 100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100625

Jewitt, C. (2009). Introduction. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. Routledge.

Jovanovic, D., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2018). Multimodal dialogue on social media. Social Semiotics, 28(5), 683–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1504732

Kasket, E. (2020). Social Media and Digital Afterlife. In M. Savin-Baden & M.-R. Victoria (Eds.), Digital Afterlife, Death Matters in a Digital Age (pp. 27–38). CRC Press.

Krutrök Moa, E. (2021). Algorithmic Closeness in Mourning: Vernaculars of the Hashtag #grief on TikTok. Social Media and Society, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211042396

Livingstone, S. (Ed.). (2005). Audiences and Publics: When cultural engagement matters for the public sphere (Vol. 2).

Logan, E. L., Thornton, J. A., Kane, R. T., & Breen, L. J. (2018). Social support following bereavement: The role of beliefs, expectations, and support intentions. Death Studies, 42(8), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2017.1382610

Manovic, L. (2001). The Language of New Media. MIT Press.

Marquart, F., Brosius, A., & de Vreese, C. (2022). United Feelings: The Mediating Role of Emotions in Social Media Campaigns for EU Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Political Marketing, 21(1), 85–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2019.1618429

Mayr, A., & Statham, S. (2021). Free Mo Robinson: citizen engagement in response to a crime event on social media. Social Semiotics, 31(3), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2021.1930854

Moreman, C. M. (2017). The Routledge companion to death and dying. In The Routledge Companion to Death and Dying. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315723747

Moschini, I. (2018). Social semiotics and platform studies: an integrated perspective for the study of social media platforms. Social Semiotics, 28(5), 623–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1504714

Murrell, A. J., Jamie, K., & Penfold-Mounce, R. (2021). ‘It was the easiest way to kind of announce it’: exploring death announcements on social media through a dramaturgical lens. Mortality. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2021.1946496

Nasrullah, R. (2015). E-Grief: Impression Management in Virtual Grief of New Media. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 20(1), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.22452/jati.vol20no1.13

Pfeifer, V. A., Armstrong, E. L., & Lai, V. T. (2022). Do all facial emojis communicate emotion? The impact of facial emojis on perceived sender emotion and text processing. Computers in Human Behavior, 126(September 2021), 107016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107016

Putri, A. S. (2020, March 29). Bunga di Pemakaman. Kompas.Com. https://www.kompas.com/skola/read/2020/03/29/100000969/bunga-di-pemakaman?page=all

Rafi, M. S. (2014). Meaning-making through minimal linguistic forms in computer-mediated communication. SAGE Open, 4(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014535939

Roberts, P. (2004). The living and the dead: Community in the virtual cemetery. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 49(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.2190/D41T-YFNN-109K-WR4C

Sovinsky, S. J. (2009). Speech act theory and internet culture: computer-mediated communication in the era of Web 2.0. August 2009. https://collections.lib.utah.edu/details?id=194082

Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer-mediated communication: Social interaction and the Internet. SAGE Publications, Ltd.

Turkle, S. (1995). Life on screen: Identity in the age of the internet. Simon & Schuster.

Wagner, A. J. M. (2018). Do not Click “Like” When Somebody has Died: The Role of Norms for Mourning Practices in Social Media. Social Media and Society, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117744392

Walter, T. (2008). The new public mourning. In Handbook of bereavement research and practice:21st century perspectives (pp. 241–262). American Psychological Association.

Walther, J. B. (2004). LANGUAGE AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4), 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X04269584

Walther, J. B. (2012). Interaction Through Technological Lenses: Computer-Mediated Communication and Language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, XX(X), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12446610

Walther, J. B., & Addario, K. P. D. (2001). The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19(3), 324–347.

Ware, R. (2016). The Impact of Social Media on the Grieving Process [Eastern Illinois University]. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/2452

Weeks, B. E., Kim, D. H., Hahn, L. B., Diehl, T. H., & Kwak, N. (2019). Hostile Media Perceptions in the Age of Social Media: Following Politicians, Emotions, and Perceptions of Media Bias. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 63(3), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1653069

Welianto, A. (2020, April 4). Mengapa Bendera Kuning Jadi Simbol Kematian di Indonesia? Kompas.Com. https://www.kompas.com/skola/read/2020/04/04/170000469/mengapa-bendera-kuning-jadi-simbol-kematian-di-indonesia?page=all

Williams, A. L., & Merten, M. J. (2009). Adolescents’ online social networking following the death of a peer. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558408328440

Wood, A. F., & Smith, M. J. (2005). Online Communication, Lingking Technology, Identity, & Culture.

Zhao, S., Djonov, E., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2014). Semiotic technology and practice: A multimodal social semiotic approach to PowerPoint. Text and Talk, 34(3), 349–375. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0005

Downloads

Published

2025-10-01

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.