Griefing emotions on Facebook wall: a visual multimodal dialogue from a semiotic technology perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v19i2.13067Keywords:
mourning, Grief, Social Media, Multimodal Dialogue, EmoticonAbstract
The expression of grief has shifted from traditional face-to-face rituals to digital spaces. Social media provides features such as emojis, stickers, and GIFs, enabling users to express mourning visually and symbolically. This phenomenon illustrates how cultural and religious practices are transformed through technological mediation. The study aims to analyze how multimodal dialogue represents grief on Facebook and how meaning is constructed in digital mourning practices. The research applies a social semiotic approach with a semiotic technology method. Data were collected from grief-related posts and comments on the Facebook account @endah.sucipto. The analysis focused on two models of interaction: system–user and user–user. Each textual and visual element was examined through multimodal content analysis and interpreted using semiotic theory. The findings show that expressions of grief appear in three dominant forms: condolences, Qur’anic verses, and prayers for the deceased. Users also rely on emojis, reaction icons, stickers, and images to strengthen emotional expression. These multimodal practices integrate religious traditions and digital symbols, creating hybrid forms of mourning in online communities. Visual features such as GIFs and stickers are substitutes for nonverbal cues and add affective value to brief textual comments. This study contributes to communication and cultural studies by showing how social media functions as both a technological medium and a cultural arena. The results highlight the role of digital semiotics in rearticulating cultural symbols of grief. Future research may expand this inquiry by comparing digital mourning practices across platforms and cultural contexts.Downloads
References
Al-rawi, A., & Al-rawi, A. (2016). Understanding the Social Media Audiences of Radio Stations. 6529(May). https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2016.1155298
Asrianto, I. D., & Rochimah, A. (2024). Followers’ Reception of Anies Baswedan’s Image on the @pinterpolitik Social Media Account. Komunika, 8(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v18i1.9267
Bakry, G. N., Nasrullah, R., & Shabana, A. (2022). Netspeak virtual ethnography as culture in the Kaskus virtual community. Plaridel, 19(1), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.52518/2022.19.1-05banash
Barnes, R., Mahar, D., Cockshaw, W., & Wong, I. (2018). Personality and online news commenting behaviours: uncovering the characteristics of those below the line. Media International Australia, 169(1), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X18798695
Bell, D. (2001). An Introduction to Cybercultures. In Cultural Studies. Routledge.
Bell, D. (2007). Cyberculture Theorists: Manuel Castells and Donna Haraway. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203357019
Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2004). Love Online, Emotions on the Internet.
Blanchard, A., & Horan, T. (1998). Virtual communities and social capital. Social Science Computer Review, 16(3), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443939801600306
Bogost, I., & Montfort, N. (2009). Platform Studies: Frequently Questioned Answers. Digital Arts and Culture, 12–15(December), 1–6.
Castells, M. (2001). The Internet Galaxy. Oxford University Press.
Cavalcante, A. (2018). Affect, emotion, and media audiences: the case of resilient reception. Media, Culture and Society, 40(8), 1186–1201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718781991
Clerici, C. A., Ferrari, A., Veneroni, L., Casiraghi, G., Giacon, B., Armiraglio, M., & Massimino, M. (2012). At least we can send some flowers. Tumori, 98(5), 146–148. https://doi.org/10.1700/1190.13218
Crystal, D. (2004). Language and the Internet. Cambridge University Press.
Day, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. In Journal of the American Society for Information Science (Vol. 50, Issue 8). https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(1999)50:8<730::aid-asi14>3.0.co;2-d
Djonov, E., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2017). The Power of Semiotic Software: A Critical Multimodal Perspective. In N. Dyer-Witheford & G. de Peuter (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 566–581). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131573
Gane, N., & Beer, D. (2008). New Media: The Key Concepts. Berg.
Ge-Stadnyk, J. (2021). Communicative functions of emoji sequences in the context of self-presentation: A comparative study of Weibo and Twitter users. Discourse and Communication, 15(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211002038
Giannoulis, E., & Wilde, L. R. A. (Eds.). (2019). Emoticons, kaomoji, and emoji: The transformation of communication in the digital age. Routledge.
Gibbs, J. L., & Ellison, N. B. (2006). Self-Presentation in Online Personals. Cmc, 152–177.
Gibbs, M., Meese, J., Arnold, M., Nansen, B., & Carter, M. (2015). #Funeral and Instagram: death, social media, and platform vernacular. Information Communication and Society, 18(3), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152
Gotved, S. (2006). Time and space in cyber social reality. New Media & Society, 8(3), 467–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444806064484
Graham, S. (2004). The Cybercities Reader (Stephen Graham (Ed.)). Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. (2004). Introduction to Functional Grammar. Hodder Arnold. https://www.functionalmedicine.org/files/library/Intro_Functional_Medicine.pdf
Ilbury, C. (2022). Discourses of social media amongst youth: An ethnographic perspective. Discourse, Context and Media, 48(November 2021), 100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100625
Jewitt, C. (2009). Introduction. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. Routledge.
Jovanovic, D., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2018). Multimodal dialogue on social media. Social Semiotics, 28(5), 683–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1504732
Kasket, E. (2020). Social Media and Digital Afterlife. In M. Savin-Baden & M.-R. Victoria (Eds.), Digital Afterlife, Death Matters in a Digital Age (pp. 27–38). CRC Press.
Krutrök Moa, E. (2021). Algorithmic Closeness in Mourning: Vernaculars of the Hashtag #grief on TikTok. Social Media and Society, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211042396
Livingstone, S. (Ed.). (2005). Audiences and Publics: When cultural engagement matters for the public sphere (Vol. 2).
Logan, E. L., Thornton, J. A., Kane, R. T., & Breen, L. J. (2018). Social support following bereavement: The role of beliefs, expectations, and support intentions. Death Studies, 42(8), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2017.1382610
Manovic, L. (2001). The Language of New Media. MIT Press.
Marquart, F., Brosius, A., & de Vreese, C. (2022). United Feelings: The Mediating Role of Emotions in Social Media Campaigns for EU Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Political Marketing, 21(1), 85–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2019.1618429
Mayr, A., & Statham, S. (2021). Free Mo Robinson: citizen engagement in response to a crime event on social media. Social Semiotics, 31(3), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2021.1930854
Moreman, C. M. (2017). The Routledge companion to death and dying. In The Routledge Companion to Death and Dying. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315723747
Moschini, I. (2018). Social semiotics and platform studies: an integrated perspective for the study of social media platforms. Social Semiotics, 28(5), 623–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1504714
Murrell, A. J., Jamie, K., & Penfold-Mounce, R. (2021). ‘It was the easiest way to kind of announce it’: exploring death announcements on social media through a dramaturgical lens. Mortality. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2021.1946496
Nasrullah, R. (2015). E-Grief: Impression Management in Virtual Grief of New Media. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 20(1), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.22452/jati.vol20no1.13
Pfeifer, V. A., Armstrong, E. L., & Lai, V. T. (2022). Do all facial emojis communicate emotion? The impact of facial emojis on perceived sender emotion and text processing. Computers in Human Behavior, 126(September 2021), 107016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107016
Putri, A. S. (2020, March 29). Bunga di Pemakaman. Kompas.Com. https://www.kompas.com/skola/read/2020/03/29/100000969/bunga-di-pemakaman?page=all
Rafi, M. S. (2014). Meaning-making through minimal linguistic forms in computer-mediated communication. SAGE Open, 4(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014535939
Roberts, P. (2004). The living and the dead: Community in the virtual cemetery. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 49(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.2190/D41T-YFNN-109K-WR4C
Sovinsky, S. J. (2009). Speech act theory and internet culture: computer-mediated communication in the era of Web 2.0. August 2009. https://collections.lib.utah.edu/details?id=194082
Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer-mediated communication: Social interaction and the Internet. SAGE Publications, Ltd.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on screen: Identity in the age of the internet. Simon & Schuster.
Wagner, A. J. M. (2018). Do not Click “Like” When Somebody has Died: The Role of Norms for Mourning Practices in Social Media. Social Media and Society, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117744392
Walter, T. (2008). The new public mourning. In Handbook of bereavement research and practice:21st century perspectives (pp. 241–262). American Psychological Association.
Walther, J. B. (2004). LANGUAGE AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4), 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X04269584
Walther, J. B. (2012). Interaction Through Technological Lenses: Computer-Mediated Communication and Language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, XX(X), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12446610
Walther, J. B., & Addario, K. P. D. (2001). The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19(3), 324–347.
Ware, R. (2016). The Impact of Social Media on the Grieving Process [Eastern Illinois University]. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/2452
Weeks, B. E., Kim, D. H., Hahn, L. B., Diehl, T. H., & Kwak, N. (2019). Hostile Media Perceptions in the Age of Social Media: Following Politicians, Emotions, and Perceptions of Media Bias. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 63(3), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1653069
Welianto, A. (2020, April 4). Mengapa Bendera Kuning Jadi Simbol Kematian di Indonesia? Kompas.Com. https://www.kompas.com/skola/read/2020/04/04/170000469/mengapa-bendera-kuning-jadi-simbol-kematian-di-indonesia?page=all
Williams, A. L., & Merten, M. J. (2009). Adolescents’ online social networking following the death of a peer. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558408328440
Wood, A. F., & Smith, M. J. (2005). Online Communication, Lingking Technology, Identity, & Culture.
Zhao, S., Djonov, E., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2014). Semiotic technology and practice: A multimodal social semiotic approach to PowerPoint. Text and Talk, 34(3), 349–375. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rulli Nasrullah, Study Rizal L. Kontu, Murodi, Jumroni, Umi Musyarrofah, Wasono Adi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).














