Simbolik Komunikasi Ritual Ukuwala Mahiate Masyarakat Islam Mamala Kabupaten Maluku Tengah

Authors

  • sulaeman sulaeman IAIN Ambon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/ibda.v16i2.1234

Keywords:

Ukuwala Mahiate, Rituals Communication, Symbolic interactionist perspective

Abstract

Ukuwala Mahiate, an integral part of the Muslim community rituals Mamala of Central Mollucas, a fusion of Islamic teachings interaction with indigenous peoples’ local wisdom, accompanied by offerings. This research would like to reveal the meanings of symbolic process ritual communication. This study aims to describe the process of ritual communication society in respect of Ukuwala Mahiate as a ritual. Through subjective interpretive method with ethnographic communication approach, the peoples undertook the construction symbols against Ukuwala Mahiate , has the meaning of the offering, solicitation, and hope. The meaning does not happen by itself, but a communication process in interpreting the process of ritual taking of palm sugar, medicinal oil, appeal and hope, communication action, and treatment of communication actors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahimsa-Putra, H. S. 2004. “Antropologi Ekologi: Beberapa Teori dan Perkembangannya” dalam Masyarakat Indonesia. Jakarta: LIPI.
Blumer, Herber. 1998. Simbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Bogdan, Robert C and Sari Knopp Biklen, 1992, Qualitatif Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc.
______ and Steven J. Taylor. 1998. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Phenomenological Approach to the Social Science. New York: John Wiley and Son.
Bowie, Fione. 2000. Ritual Theory, Rites of Passage and Ritual Violence. Dalam The Anthropology of Religion.
Carey, James W. 1992. Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society. Newyork: Routledge.
Cassirer, Ernst. 1944. “An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture.” New Haven.
Charon, Joel M. 1989. Symbolic Interaction: An Introduction, An Interpretation, An Integration. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Clifford, James. 1988. “The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art.” Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Creswell, John W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks: CA. Sage Publication Inc.
Couldry, Nick. 2005. Media Rituals: Beyond Functionalism, dalam Media Anthropoloy. Editor: Eric W. Rothenbuhler dan Mihai Coman. London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Denzin, Norman K. and Lincoln, Yvonna S. 2005. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Third Edition. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Dolgin, J. L. D. S., Kemnitzer, D. M. Schneider (Eds.). 1977. Symbolic Anthropology. New York: Columbia University Press.
Foni, Wilhelmus. 2004. “Budaya Bertani Atoni Pah Meto: Siklus Ritus Bertani Lahan Kering Atoni Pah Meto Tunbaba Timor, Nusa Tenggara Timur”. Salatiga: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.
Foster, George M. 1973. Traditional Societies and Technological Change. Second Edition. New York-Evanston - San Francisco - London: Harper and Row Publishers.
Friedman, Yonathan (ed.). 1993. Cultural Identity and Global Process. London: Sage Publication.
Hadikusuma, Hilman. 1992. Pengantar Antropologi Hukum. Bandung: Citra Additya Bhakti.
Hammad, Ibnu. 2006. Communication as Discourse. Makalah. Jakarta
Kleden, Ignas. 1998. “Dari Etnografi ke Etnografi Tentang Etnografi: Antropologi Clifford Geertz dalam Tiga Tahap”. Kata Pengantar dalam Clifford Geertz: After The Fact, Dua Negeri, Empat Dasawarsa, Satu Antropologi. Yogyakarta: Penerbit LKIS.
Koentjaraningrat. 1996. Pengantar Antropologi I. Jakarta: Penerbit Rineca Cipta.
Kuper, A. 1999. Culture: The Anthropologist’ Acount. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Kuswarno, Engkus. 2008. Etnografi Komunikasi suatu Pengantar dan Contoh Penelitiannya. Widya Padjadjaran. Bandung.
Littlejohn, Stephen W. 1996. Theories of Human Communication. California: Wardsworth.
Mulyana, Deddy, 2001. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
_______. 2005. Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Richards, P. 1985. Indigenous Agricultural Revolution: Ecology and Food Production in West Africa. London: Longman.
Rock, Paul. 2001. “Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnography,” in Paul Atkinson et al. (Ed.): “Handbook of Ethnography”. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Rothenbuhler, Eric W. 1998. Ritual Communication: From Everyday Conversation to Mediated Ceremony. SAGE Publications.
Turner, Victor. 1982. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndebu Ritual. Itacha and London: Cornell University Press.

Downloads

Published

2018-11-22

How to Cite

sulaeman, sulaeman. (2018). Simbolik Komunikasi Ritual Ukuwala Mahiate Masyarakat Islam Mamala Kabupaten Maluku Tengah. IBDA` : Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Budaya, 16(2), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.24090/ibda.v16i2.1234