Strategic Communication and Genealogical Legitimacy: Rabithah Alawiyah’s Public Relations Response to Lineage Denial and False Habib Phenomena
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v19i2.13371Keywords:
Public Relations Strategy, Rabithah Alawiyah, Denial of Lineage, False HabibAbstract
The phenomenon of lineage denial and the emergence of individuals falsely claiming the status of Habib has increasingly posed a substantive challenge for Rabithah Alawiyah as a genealogical and religious authority. This study seeks to examine the public relations strategies employed by Rabithah Alawiyah in responding to these issues, particularly in navigating the contestation of genealogical authenticity and the social implications arising from the presence of illegitimate claims. Methodologically, this research adopts a qualitative approach with a case study design, enabling an in-depth exploration of Rabithah Alawiyah's communicative practices and institutional responses to the aforementioned challenges. The research utilizes the Four-Step Public Relations Process theory. Data collection techniques include in-depth interviews, non-participant observation, and document analysis. Informants were selected using purposive sampling techniques. The research findings indicate that the Rabithah Alawiyah public relations actively monitors issues through social media and community reports to identify patterns of lineage denial and false claims of Habib. The organization designs strategies based on lineage education, strengthening genealogical literacy, and building synergy with academics and religious figures. Rabithah Alawiyah optimizes digital media, seminars, and community collaborations to strengthen factual narratives. The evaluation is conducted periodically by reviewing public responses, educational programs' effectiveness, and community engagement levels to clarify the information the organization provides. The research concludes that education-based public relations strategies, information transparency, and data-driven approaches are key to maintaining the organization's credibility.Downloads
References
Andersson, R. (2024). Public Relations Strategizing: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding the Doing of Strategy in Public Relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 36(2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2023.2259523
Arnus, S. H., Husain, W., & Asriani, D. (2023). Online Media Literacy among Gen Z in Kendari City in the Post-Truth Era. Komunika: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 17(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v17i1.7806
BBC News. (2024). Penipuan sertifikat Habib palsu: Mengapa ada yang rela membayar demi menyandang status ‘Habib’? https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/c3gmnxnp2x4o
Cutlip, S. M., Center, A. H., & Broom, G. M. (2006). Effective Public Relations. Prentice Hall. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=BG-vQgAACAAJ
Hasanudin, & Setiarso, G. (2025). Legitmasi Nasab dan Strategi Dakwah Habib Ba’alwi dalam Perspektif Muhammadiyah. Masterpiece: Journal of Islamic Studies and Social Sciences, 3(1), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.62083/7d8qcb83
Hemdi, Y. (2021). Sejarah Keteladanan Nabi Muhammad SAW.: Memahami Kemuliaan Rasulullah Berdasarkan Tafsir Mukjizat Al-Quran.
Kersten, C. (2017). A History of Islam in Indonesia Unity in Diversity.
Kurdi, S., Alamudi, I. A., & Syafiq, M. (2024). Fenomena Habib Terhadap Publik Dalam Teologi Dan Sosiologi. Jurnal Ilmiah Sosiologi Agama (JISA), 7(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.30829/jisa.v7i2.20111
Muhajir, A., Alatas, A., Muhajir, A., & Alatas, A. (2023). The Debate on the Ba‘Alawi Lineage in Indonesia: Highlighting Weaknesses in the Genealogical Records. In The Debate on the Ba’Alawi Lineage in Indonesia: Highlighting Weaknesses in the Genealogical Records (pp. 1–32). ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
Muhammad, F. A. (2024). Perebutan Otoritas Keagamaan: Persaingan Kekuasaan dibalik Debat Nasab Ba’ Alawi. POLITEA, 7(1), 189. https://doi.org/10.21043/politea.v7i1.28727
Muzemmil. (2024). Polemik Nasab Habaib: Framing Channel YouTube Rhoma Irama. J-KIs: Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, 5(2), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.53429/j-kis.v5i2.1185
Nurjaman, I. M., Mutaqin, F., & Putra, T. N. F. (2023). Perkembangan Penulisan Sejarah Nasab dari Pra-Islam Hingga Islam dan Pengaruhnya di Nusantara. Definisi: Jurnal Agama Dan Sosial Humaniora, 2(3), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1557/djash.v2i3.34155
Pomalingo, S., Idrus, N. I., Mohammad Basir, & Mashadi. (2023). Contestation and Polemic of Islamic Thought in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Literature and Muslim Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.22515/islimus.v6i2.5749
Prasetyo Nugroho, A. R. B. & Nawawi. (2023). Construction of Religious Tolerance: Revitalizing The Prayer of Da’wah on Social Media. Komunika: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 17(2), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v17i2.9220
Robert K. Yin. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. London : SAGE Publications, Inc.
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Alfabeta.
Willaert, T., Van Eecke, P., Beuls, K., & Steels, L. (2020). Building Social Media Observatories for Monitoring Online Opinion Dynamics. Social Media + Society, 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119898778.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Melly Maulin Purwaningwulan, Sayid Riziq Zulkarnaen

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).














