RELASI KIAI-SANTRI DI PESANTREN FUTUHIYYAH, DEMAK

Authors

  • Suparjo Suparjo IAIN Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/ibda.v15i2.1335

Keywords:

Communication, Interpersonal, Kiai-Santri, Pesantren

Abstract

This writing discusses interpersonal relations between kiai and santri which concludes that ethic-pedagogic communication is a result from closed-distanced relation via habituation process based on unifying reflective-ethics conscience with practical conscience in religious patron- age social relation ethics value based. Both value and the practice of ethic- pedagogic communication tradition, in terms of interpersonal communi- cation between kiai and santri, contain positive and negative effects. The sense of kinship becomes an ideal value which should be preserved and adopted in educational system outside pesantren. The charisma-tization and symbolization towards kiai, create more awareness in studying pro- cess and maximizing self development during a period in pesantren and even beyond. Kiai - santri interpersonal communication restores many nega- tive - unproductive attitudes deliberately and ramifies positive - construc- tive side in everyday life. The more reflective conscience arises in many pesantren communities, significantly cementing the tradition. And if this habitus collectively formed and more and more become a tradition, this could affect to each person who enter the pesantren . This transformation into tradition could possibly occured because of the “abration of tradi- tion†process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bourdieu, Pierre and J.C. Passeron. 1977. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2004. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. New York & London: Routledge.
________________. 1990. In Other Words. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.
_______________. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power, transl. Gyno Raymond and Mathew Adamson. Cambridge, Massacusset: Harvars University Press.
________________. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
________________. 1990b. The Logic of Practice, translated by Richard Nice. Stanford, Californa: Stanford University Press.
Bungin, M. Burhan. 2007. Sosiologi Komunikasi: Teori, Paradigma dan Diskursus Teknologi Komunikasi di Masyarakat . Jakarta: Kencana.
Field, John. 2010. Modal Sosial, terj. Nurhadi. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.
Ghazali, Imam. t.t. Ih}ya>’ ‘Ulu>m ad-Di>n, Jilid I. Semarang: Thoha Putera.
Giddens, Anthony. 1976. New Rules of Sociological Methods. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2nd Edition.
________________. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Mac- millan.
________________. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
________________. 2010. Teori Strukturasi: Dasar-dasar Pembentukan Struktur Sosial, terj. Maufur dan Daryatno. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Haryatmoko. 2008. “Sekolah, Alat Reproduksi Kesenjangan Sosial: Analisis Kritis Pierre Bourdieu” dalam Basis No. 07-08, Tahun ke-7, Juli-Agustus.
Jenkins, Richard. 2004. Membaca Pikiran Bourdieu, terj. Nurhadi, (Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.
Jones, Pip. 2009. Pengantar Teori-Teori Sosial: dari Fungsionalisme hingga Post-Modernisme. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Mitchel, G. Duncan (ed.). 1979. A New Dictionary of Sociology. London and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Priyono, B. Herry. 2002. Anthony Giddens: Suatu Pengantar . Jakarta: KPG.
Putra, Heddy Shri Ahimsa. 1998. Minawang: Hubungan Patron-Klien di Sulawesi Selatan. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Ritzer, George & Douglas J. Goodman. 2005. Teori Sosiologi Modern, terj. Alimandan. Jakarta: Kencana, Cet. III.
Turner, Jonathan H. 1997. The Structure of Sociological Theory . Belmon, CA: Wadsworth.
Zarnuji Az-. t.t. Ta’li>m al-Muta’allim . Surabaya: Nur Asiya.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-12

How to Cite

Suparjo, S. (2017). RELASI KIAI-SANTRI DI PESANTREN FUTUHIYYAH, DEMAK. IBDA` : Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Budaya, 15(2), 192–214. https://doi.org/10.24090/ibda.v15i2.1335