Implementation of Contextual Teaching and Learning for Basic Natural Sciences at Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, UNUGHA Cilacap

Anastya Nida Alhana; Sedya Sentosa; Wida Nurul Azizah

doi:10.24090/jimrf.v13i2.12128

Authors

Anastya Nida Alhana UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Sedya Sentosa UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Wida Nurul Azizah UNUGHA Cilacap

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/jimrf.v13i2.12128

Keywords:

CTL, Innovation, Learning, Lecturers, Students

Abstract

This research aims to spread the implementation of learning innovations in Basic Natural Science courses at Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (MI Basic Science) using the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) method at Nahdlatul Ulama Al Ghazali University (UNUGHA) Cilacap. The research method used is a case study with a qualitative approach. The aim of this research is to assess the effectiveness of the CTL method in increasing students’ understanding of Basic Natural Sciences and the extent to which this learning innovation is implemented in the MI educational environment. Through observations, interviews, and documentation analysis, this research describes how CTL is implemented, student responses, and its impact on understanding MI Basic Science concepts. The research results show that the implementation of CTL at UNUGHA Cilacap succeeded in increasing student involvement and the relevance of the material to everyday contexts. Students show increased understanding of MI Basic Science concepts, and this method provides significant support for achieving learning objectives. In conclusion, CTL is effectively applied in educational contexts, providing a stimulative and interactive learning environment. The practical implications of this research are recommendations for continuing to apply the CTL method in the development of the MI Basic Science curriculum

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustiningsih, W., Luthfiyah, L., & Ruslan, R. (2024). Analisis Implementasi Model Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Indonesia (JPPI), 4, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v4i1.406

Alhana, A. N. (2023). Observasi di Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Al Ghazali (UNUGHA) Cilacap.

Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., Airasian, P., Cruikshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. (2000). Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing, A: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Abridged Edition (1st edition). Pearson.

Azizah, W. N. (2017). PENGEMBANGAN MODUL PRAKTIKUM PEMBELAJARAN IPA (SAINS) UNTUK MATA KULIAH PILIHAN di PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN GURU MADRASAH IBTIDAIYAH (PGMI) FAKULTAS TARBIYAH, INSTITUT AGAMA ISLAM IMAM GHOZALI (IAIIG) CILACAP 2016. Jurnal Tawadhu, 1(2), Article 2. https://jurnal.unugha.ac.id/index.php/twd/article/view/269

Azizah, W. N. (2023). Wawancara dengan Wida Nurul Azizah (Ketua Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidayah UNUGHA Cilacap) [Personal communication].

Brown, J. (2002). Training Needs Assessment: A Must for Developing an Effective Training Program. Public Personnel Management, 31, 569–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600203100412

Brown, J. D. (1995). The Elements of Language Curriculum: A Systematic Approach to Program Development. Heinle & Heinle.

Bruner, J. (1977). The Process of Education: Revised Edition. Harvard University Press.

Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., LePage, P., Hammerness, K., & Duffy, H. (Eds.). (2007). Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do (1st edition). Jossey-Bass.

Deming, W. E. (2000). Out of the Crisis (Reprint edition). The MIT Press.

Dewey, J. (1986). Experience and Education. The Educational Forum. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131728609335764

Easley, J. A. (1978). Book Reviews: Jean Piaget, The Development of Thought: Equilibration of Cognitive Structures. (Translation by Arnold Rosin of Volume 33 of the Études d’Épistémologie Génétique) New York: The Viking Press, 1977. 213 pp., $12.50. Educational Researcher, 7(11), 18–19. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X007011018

Gagné, R. M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Hasudungan, A. N. (2022). Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching Learning (CTL) Pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19: Sebuah Tinjauan. Jurnal DinamikA, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.18326/dinamika.v3i2.112-126

Hidayat, T., & Syahidin, S. (2019). INOVASI PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM MELALUI MODEL CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING DALAM MENINGKATKAN TARAF BERPIKIR PESERTA DIDIK. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 16(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2019.162-01

Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual Teaching and Learning: What It Is and Why It’s Here to Stay. Corwin Press.

Juhji, J. (2015). Pendekatan Saintifik dalam Pembelajaran IPA di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Primary: Jurnal Keilmuan Dan Kependidikan Dasar, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.32678/primary.v7i1.2976

Knowles, M. S. (1988). The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy (Revised edition). Cambridge Book Co.

Kolb, D. A. (1983). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development (1st edition). Prentice Hall.

Kurniasih, D. (2021). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching And Learning (CTL) Dalam Pelajaran IPA Di Sekolah Dasar. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHEs): Conference Series, 3, 285. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v3i4.53345

Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 4, 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x

Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024

Miller, M. D., Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (2008). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching (10th edition). Pearson College Div.

Moleong, L. J. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nadiroh, N. (2015). METODE PEMBELAJARAN IPA DI MI NEGERI SIKANCO KECAMATAN NUSAWUNGU KABUPATEN CILACAP TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015. Jurnal Penelitian Agama, 16, 93–105. https://doi.org/10.24090/jpa.v16i1.2015.pp93-105

Nofriani, N., & Yusnira, Y. (2019). PENINGKATAN HASIL BELAJAR IPA DENGAN PENDEKATAN CTL (CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING) SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 1, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v1i1.339

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children (p. 419). W W Norton & Co. https://doi.org/10.1037/11494-000

Piaget, J. (1977). The Development of Thought: Equilibration of Cognitive Structures (A. Rosin, Trans.; First Edition). Viking Press.

Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Rahmawati, T. (2018). PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN CTL UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR PADA MATA PELAJARAN IPA. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 2. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v2i1.13765

Rosyiddin, A. A. Z., Johan, R. C., & Mulyadi, D. (2022). Inovasi Pembelajaran Sebagai Upaya Menyelesaikan Problematika Pendidikan Indonesia. Inovasi Kurikulum, 19(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.17509/jik.v19i1.42679

Schon, D. A. (1984). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action (1st edition). Basic Books.

Serroukh, S., & Serroukh, I. (2022). Traditional teaching method Vs Modern teaching method Traditional teaching method Vs Modern teaching method The traditional way of teaching and learning.

Sidiq, U. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif di Bidang Pendidikan. Nata Karya.

Sudarisman, S. (2013). IMPLEMENTASI PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUAL DENGAN VARIASI METODE BERBASIS MASALAH UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KUALITAS PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v2i1.2506

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sulthon, S. (2017). Pembelajaran IPA yang Efektif dan Menyenangkan bagi Siswa MI. ELEMENTARY: Islamic Teacher Journal, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.21043/elementary.v4i1.1969

Susiloningsih, W. (2016). Model Pembelajaran CTL (Contextual Teaching and Learning) dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa PGSD Pada MataKuliah Konsep IPS Dasar: Pedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v5i1.89

Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction (P. S. Hlebowitsh, Ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/B/bo17239506.html

Utami, N. M. N. P., Wulandari, I. G. A. A., & Agustika, G. N. S. (2022). Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Berbantuan Media Benda Konkret Meningkatkan Pengetahuan IPAS Siswa. Mimbar Pendidikan Indonesia, 3(3), Article 3. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JIPI2/article/view/62569

Verry, V., Haq, A., & Lasimin. (2023). ANALISIS KUALITAS LAYANAN ONLINE PUBLIC ACCESS CATALOG (OPAC) TERHADAP KEPUASAN PENGGUNA DI UNIVERSITAS NAHDLATUL ULAMA AL GHAZALI (UNUGHA) CILACAP MENGGUNAKAN METODE E-SERVQUAL. JOINICS (Journal Of Informatics And Computer Sciences), 1(1), Article 1. https://jurnal.unugha.ac.id/index.php/jnc/article/view/374

Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance (1st edition). Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding By Design (2nd Expanded edition). Assn. for Supervision & Curriculum Development.

Wijaya, Y. (2015). PENERAPAN PEMBELAJARAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL) DALAM MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR IPA PADA SISWA TUNARUNGU DI SLB B/C. Modeling: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 2. https://doi.org/10.2345/jm.v2i1.739

Zulfa, U., & Kurniasih, N. (2017). EFEKTIVITAS STRATEGI PERCEPATAN PENYELESAIAN STUDI PROGRAM S1 FAKULTAS TARBIYAH IAIIG CILACAP. Jurnal Tawadhu, 1(2), Article 2. https://jurnal.unugha.ac.id/index.php/twd/article/view/268