Menilik Kualitas Bimbingan Manasik Haji Melalui Program Sertifikasi Pembimbing Manasik Haji
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24090/jpa.v23i1.2022.pp125-146Keywords:
evaluasi program, sertifikasi, pembimbing manasik hajiAbstract
Sertifikasi pembimbing manasik haji dilakukan sebagai proses penilaian atas kemampuan dan keterampilan seseorang untuk melakukan bimbingan manasik haji secara profesional. Output dari proses penliaian tersebut berupa sertifikat pembimbing manasik haji. Perlunya dilaksanakan evaluasi sertifikasi pembimbing manasik adalah untuk melihat sejauh mana efektifitas penyelenggaraan sertifikasi pembimbing manasik haji yang telah dilakukan di Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri (PTKIN) yang tersebar di Indonesia, permasalahan dan problematika yang muncul dalam pelaksanaan sertifikasi pembimbing dan peran pembimbing manasik bersertifikat dalam memberikan edukasi dan bimbingan kepada jemaah haji. Evaluasi dilakukan menggunakan model CIPPO (Context, Input, Process, Product dan Outcome. Penelitian yang dilakukan dengan pendekatan kualitatif ini dilakukan di UIN Walisongo Semarang dan UIN Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, lembaga yang ditunjuk oleh Ditjen PHU sebagai lembaga penyelenggara kegiatan program Sertifikasi Pembimbingan Manasik Haji. Sebagai hasil dari evaluasi dengan menggunakan model CIPPO bahwa pelaksanaan program sertifikasi pembimbing manasik haji telah sesuai dengan pedoman da peraturan yang ditetapkan oleh Ditjen PHU yang meliputi dasar pelaksanaan, kepesertaan, tenaga pengajar dan narasumber, proses dan prosedur pelaksanaan dari mulai awal pembelajaran sampi dengan evaluasi dan dimensi keluaran yang diharapkan dari program tersebut walaupun masih ada sedikit perbedaan persepsi dalam penyelenggaraan program.References
Abdul, K., Shahed, F. H., Mohamed, Abdul Rashid, M. M. R., & Ismai, S. A. M. M. (2018). Evaluation of the Teacher Education Programs in EFL Context : A Testimony of Student Teachers ’ Perspective. International Journal Of Instruction, 12(1), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1219a
Bishop, L. (2007). A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data : Beyond Primary / Secondary Dualism Keywords : Convenience Food , Data Archives , Qualitative Data , Reflexivity , Data. 12(3). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1553
Cruz, R. F. (2017). Reading and Understanding Qualitative Research. 39, 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10465-016-9219-z
Goyol, A. B. (2014). Perspectives on the Impact of Evaluation : Approaches to Assessing Development Effectiveness and Good Governance in Nigeria. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 4(8), 81–91.
Hossain, D. M. (2011). Qualitative Research Process Abstract : Introduction : Lumen Research Center in Social and Humanistic Sciences, 7(2), 143–156.
Kielmann, K., Cataldo, F., & Seeley, J. (2012). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methodology: A Training Manual. Department for International Development (DfID).
Kofner, A. (2013). RAND Corporation.
Larke, P. (2013). Program Evaluation : The Multicultural Curriculum Transformation and Research Institute THE LIBERAL ARTS TO THE SCIENCES ( 2013 ), pp . 13-26 Program Evaluation : The Multicultural Curriculum Transformation and Research. 391(2013), 13–26.
Liang, B., & Lu, H. (2006). Conducting Fieldwork in China Data Regarding Crime , Law , and the Criminal Justice System. 22(2), 157–172.
Mukhopadhyay, S., & Gupta, R. K. (2014). Survey of Qualitative Research Methodology in Strategy Research and Implication for Indian Researchers. SAGE Publications, 18(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262914528437
Nurfizri, S. K. (2015). Manajemen Pelatihan Sertifikasi Pembimbing Manasik Haji Pada Kantor Wilayah Kementerian Agama DKI Jakarta. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.
Rachel, L. H. and. (2005). Negotiating Researcher Roles in Ethnographic Program Evaluation : A Postmodern Lens Author ( s ): Linda Harklau and Rachel Norwood Source : Anthropology & Education Quarterly , Vol . 36 , No . 3 ( Sep ., 2005 ), pp . 278-288 Published by : Wiley on behalf. 36(3), 278–288.
Roberts, M. C., & Steele, R. G. (2005). Program Evaluation Approaches to Service Delivery in Child and Family Mental Health (pp. 351–369). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23864-6_23
Sarbini, A., Rahman, A., Rustandi, R., Dakwah, M., Sunan, U. I. N., & Djati, G. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia dalam Optimalisasi Sertifikasi Pembimbing Manasik Ibadah Haji. 2.
Seyma Sahin, abdurahman kilic. (2018). International Journal of Instruction. School Self Evaluation Model Suggestion, 11(3), 193–206.
Shabbir, A., Raja, H., Qadri, A. A., & Qadri, M. H. A. (2020). Faculty Feedback Program Evaluation in CIMS Multan, Pakistan. Cureus, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.7759/CUREUS.8612
Sya’adah, E. (2016). Efektivitas Pelatihan Sertifikasi Dalam Meningkatkan profesionalisme Pembimbingan Manasik Haji Pada Kanwil Kementrian Agama provinsi banten Tahun 2016.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Office of the Director, O. of S. and I. (2011). Introduction to Program Evaluation for Public Health Programs : A Self-Study Guide. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, October, 1–100. https://www.urbanreproductivehealth.org/toolkits/measuring-success/introduction-program-evaluation-public-health-programs-self-study-guide
Umam, K. A., & Saripah, I. (2018). Using the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Model in the Evaluation of Training Programs. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2(July), 19. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i0.26086
Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Traditions : epistemological , theoretical ,. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12014
Zohrabi, M. (2012). An Introduction to Course and / or Program Evaluation. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 59–70.
Bishop, L. (2007). A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data : Beyond Primary / Secondary Dualism Keywords : Convenience Food , Data Archives , Qualitative Data , Reflexivity , Data. 12(3). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1553
Cruz, R. F. (2017). Reading and Understanding Qualitative Research. 39, 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10465-016-9219-z
Goyol, A. B. (2014). Perspectives on the Impact of Evaluation : Approaches to Assessing Development Effectiveness and Good Governance in Nigeria. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 4(8), 81–91.
Hossain, D. M. (2011). Qualitative Research Process Abstract : Introduction : Lumen Research Center in Social and Humanistic Sciences, 7(2), 143–156.
Kielmann, K., Cataldo, F., & Seeley, J. (2012). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methodology: A Training Manual. Department for International Development (DfID).
Kofner, A. (2013). RAND Corporation.
Larke, P. (2013). Program Evaluation : The Multicultural Curriculum Transformation and Research Institute THE LIBERAL ARTS TO THE SCIENCES ( 2013 ), pp . 13-26 Program Evaluation : The Multicultural Curriculum Transformation and Research. 391(2013), 13–26.
Liang, B., & Lu, H. (2006). Conducting Fieldwork in China Data Regarding Crime , Law , and the Criminal Justice System. 22(2), 157–172.
Mukhopadhyay, S., & Gupta, R. K. (2014). Survey of Qualitative Research Methodology in Strategy Research and Implication for Indian Researchers. SAGE Publications, 18(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262914528437
Nurfizri, S. K. (2015). Manajemen Pelatihan Sertifikasi Pembimbing Manasik Haji Pada Kantor Wilayah Kementerian Agama DKI Jakarta. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.
Rachel, L. H. and. (2005). Negotiating Researcher Roles in Ethnographic Program Evaluation : A Postmodern Lens Author ( s ): Linda Harklau and Rachel Norwood Source : Anthropology & Education Quarterly , Vol . 36 , No . 3 ( Sep ., 2005 ), pp . 278-288 Published by : Wiley on behalf. 36(3), 278–288.
Roberts, M. C., & Steele, R. G. (2005). Program Evaluation Approaches to Service Delivery in Child and Family Mental Health (pp. 351–369). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23864-6_23
Sarbini, A., Rahman, A., Rustandi, R., Dakwah, M., Sunan, U. I. N., & Djati, G. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia dalam Optimalisasi Sertifikasi Pembimbing Manasik Ibadah Haji. 2.
Seyma Sahin, abdurahman kilic. (2018). International Journal of Instruction. School Self Evaluation Model Suggestion, 11(3), 193–206.
Shabbir, A., Raja, H., Qadri, A. A., & Qadri, M. H. A. (2020). Faculty Feedback Program Evaluation in CIMS Multan, Pakistan. Cureus, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.7759/CUREUS.8612
Sya’adah, E. (2016). Efektivitas Pelatihan Sertifikasi Dalam Meningkatkan profesionalisme Pembimbingan Manasik Haji Pada Kanwil Kementrian Agama provinsi banten Tahun 2016.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Office of the Director, O. of S. and I. (2011). Introduction to Program Evaluation for Public Health Programs : A Self-Study Guide. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, October, 1–100. https://www.urbanreproductivehealth.org/toolkits/measuring-success/introduction-program-evaluation-public-health-programs-self-study-guide
Umam, K. A., & Saripah, I. (2018). Using the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Model in the Evaluation of Training Programs. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2(July), 19. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i0.26086
Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Traditions : epistemological , theoretical ,. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12014
Zohrabi, M. (2012). An Introduction to Course and / or Program Evaluation. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 59–70.
Downloads
Published
2022-06-30
How to Cite
Atieqoh, S., Fakhruddin, M., Abidin, Z., & Waseso, H. P. (2022). Menilik Kualitas Bimbingan Manasik Haji Melalui Program Sertifikasi Pembimbing Manasik Haji. Jurnal Penelitian Agama, 23(1), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.24090/jpa.v23i1.2022.pp125-146
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Siti Atieqoh, M. Fakhruddin, Zaenal Abidin, Hendri Purbo Waseso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
