Konten Moderasi Beragama Sebagai Lived Religion di Tiktok
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24090/jpa.v25i2.2024.pp275-289Keywords:
Lived Religion, Moderasi Beragama, TikTokAbstract
Kementerian Agama memproklamasikan moderasi beragama sebagai cara pandang kehidupan religius yang menghindari sikap ekstrim dalam beragama. Fenomena tentang moderasi beragama menjadi bahan penyiaran lewat media sosial, salah satunya TikTok. Aplikasi ini menjadi salah satu alat media sosial yang dimanfaatkan untuk penyiaran religius dengan jenis konten moderasi beragama. Peneliti berargumen bahwa penyiaran konten moderasi beragama menjadi gambaran agama yang hidup (lived religion) di TikTok. Oleh karena itu, tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis konten moderasi beragama sebagai lived religion di TikTok berdasarkan teori Nancy T. Ammerman. Dengan berfokus pada konten dari akun yang menyiarkan moderasi beragama, penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan mengumpulkan data lewat teknik purposive sampling dan menganalisis data berdasarkan content analysis. Peneliti menemukan bahwa Lived Religion pada konten moderasi beragama dalam TikTok lebih menampilkan dua dimensi dalam praktiknya, yaitu estetika dan narasi. Jika estetika mengadakan nilai seni perilaku yang menghidupkan moderasi beragama dengan penjelasan konten yang menarik, maka narasi mempertontonkan perilaku yang bernuansa cerita terkait melakukan tindakan untuk mewujudkan moderasi beragama. Dengan demikian, konten moderasi beragama dalam TikTok membuktikan adanya lived religion dan para pengguna TikTok menampilkan praktik yang moderat.References
Aditya, R., & Mayasari, I. (2022). The Implementation Religious Moderation in Serang Municipial: Religious Harmony Forum Perspective. Penamas, 35(2), 253–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31330/penamas.v35i2.626
Afwadzi, B., Miski, & Rohmana, W. I. M. (2023). Religious Moderation Based on the Ministry of Religious Affairs’ Perspective: A Study on Islamic Universities in Malang. Penamas, 36(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31330/penamas.v36i1.649
Albana, H. (2023). Implementasi Pendidikan Moderasi Beragama di Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal SMART (Studi Masyarakat, Religi, dan Tradisi), 9(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18784/smart.v9i1.1849
Alvian, R. A. (2023). How Extremist Movements Delegitimise Religious Moderation Campaigns: A Case of Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (2018-2022). Perspectives on Terrorism, 17(3), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.19165/MDOT2199
Amirudin, Suyono, Soeprijanto, & Maknun, L. (2022). Measuring Religious Moderation Among Students. Penamas, 35(2), 283–297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31330/penamas.v35i2.624
Ammerman, Nancy T. (2014). Finding religion in everyday life. Sociology of Religion: A Quarterly Review, 75(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/sru013
Ammerman, Nancy T. (2015). Lived Religion. In R. Scott & S. Kosslyn (Ed.), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Ammerman, Nancy T. (2016). Lived religion as an emerging field: An assessment of its contours and frontiers. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 29(2), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1890-7008-2016-02-01
Ammerman, Nancy Tatom. (2021). Studying Lived Religion: Contexts and Practices. New York: New York University Press.
Atasoge, A. D., Aran, A. M., & Sihombing, A. A. (2023). Korke: Rumah Moderasi Beragama Masyarakat Lamaholot di Flores Timur. Jurnal SMART (Studi Masyarakat, Religi, dan Tradisi), 9(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18784/smart.v9i1.1877
Baba, M. A., Zainal, N. F., & Subeitan, S. M. (2023). Religious Moderation: Concept and Implementation in State Islamic Religious Universities. Al-Ulum, 23(2), 426–441. https://doi.org/10.30603/au.v23i2.4139
Campbell, H. A., & Evolvi, G. (2020). Contextualizing current digital religion research on emerging technologies. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.149
Cowan, D. E. (2007). Religion on the Internet. In J. A. Beckford & N. J. D. III (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of the Sociology of Religion. London: SAGE Publications.
Dunbar, R. (2022). How Religion Evolved: And Why it Endures. New York: Oxford University Press.
Febriani, S. R., & Ritonga, A. W. (2022). The Perception of Millennial Generation on Religious Moderation through Social Media in the Digital Era. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 21(2), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol21.iss2.art1
Fitri, A. N. (2022). Moderasi Beragama dalam Tayangan Anak-anak; Analisis Isi Tayangan Nussa dan Rara Episode Toleransi. Jurnal SMART (Studi Masyarakat, Religi, dan Tradisi), 8(1), 129–146.
Gultom, P. A. (2023). Pemuridan bagi Apologetika Kaum Awam di Era Digital. Jurnal Teologi Berita Hidup, 6(1), 234–248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38189/jtbh.v6i1.419
Hati, L. P., Al-Mujtahid, N. M., Kholil, S., Sahfutra, S. A., Ginting, L. D. C. U., & Fahreza, I. (2023). Religious Harmony Forum: Ideal Religious Moderation in the Frame of Building Tolerance in Medan City, Indonesia. Pharos Journal of Theology, 104(4), 1–3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.104.420
Huda, M. (2024). Incorporating the Value of Religious Moderation in Islamic Education Learning. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 8(1), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v8i1.476
Hutchings, T. (2015). Now the Bible Is an App: Digital Media and Changing Patterns of Religious Authority. In K. Granholm, M. Moberg, & S. Sjö (Ed.), Religion, Media, and Social Change. New York: Routledge.
Irawan, G. B., & Radiamoda, A. (2023). Prophetic Communication: Implementation of Da’i Da’wah Strategies in The Millennial Era. Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, Adab dan Dakwah, 5(2), 249–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32939/ishlah.v5i2.260
Ishaq, R. el. (2021). Media in the Midst of Religion Moderation. INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication), 6(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v6i1.41-56
Izazy, N. Q. (2022). Religious Moderation Among Indigent Families in Jakarta. Penamas, 35(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.31330/penamas.v35i2.535
Kirana, D., & Garadian, E. A. (2020). Religious trend in contemporary indonesia: Conservatism domination on social media. Studia Islamika, 27(3), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v27i3.18823
Levin, I., & Mamlok, D. (2021). Culture and society in the digital age. Information (Switzerland), 12(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12020068
Miltsov, A. (2022). Researching TikTok: Themes, Methods, and Future Directions. In A. Quan-Haase & L. Sloan (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
Murad, A. N., & Rizki, D. (2022). Development of religious moderation study on prevention of radicalism in indonesia: a systematic literature review approach. POTENSIA: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 8(2), 198–224.
Niknam, F., Samadbeik, M., Fatehi, F., Shirdel, M., Rezazadeh, M., & Bastani, P. (2021). COVID-19 on Instagram: A content analysis of selected accounts. Health Policy and Technology, 10(1), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.10.016
Nole, O. A. (2023a). Gereja dengan Model Hibrida: Sebuah Pendekatan Eklesiologi di Era Pasca Pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Teologi & Pelayanan Kerusso, 8(2), 84–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33856/kerusso.v8i2.305
Nole, O. A. (2023b). Pengalaman Mahasiswa Rantau tentang Adaptasi Lintas Budaya di Salatiga: Suatu Tinjauan Teologi Interkultural. ARUMBAE: Jurnal Ilmiah Teologi dan Studi Agama, 5(2), 276–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37429/arumbae.v5i2.1067
Nole, O. A. (2024a). Balinese Actions and Solidarity Regarding Ogoh-Ogoh in Banjar Untal-Untal: A Sociology of Religion Perspective. Vidyottama Sanatana: International Journal of Hindu Science and Religious Studies, 8(1), 116–124. Diambil dari https://ojs.uhnsugriwa.ac.id/index.php/IJHSRS/article/view/3584
Nole, O. A. (2024b). Penggunaan Kitab Keagamaan Menjelang Pemilu 2024 di Media Sosial. VIDYA SAMHITA: Jurnal Penelitian Agama, 10(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25078/vs.v10i1.3387
Nole, O. A., & Serdianus. (2023). Pendidikan Interreligius Berbasis Moderasi Beragama untuk Membentuk Karakter Bangsa. MELO: Jurnal Studi Agama-agama, 3(2), 90–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34307/mjsaa.v3i2.140
Nole, O. A., & Setyawan, Y. B. (2024). Pengaruh Alkitab terhadap Natal dan Implikasi Realitas Bisnis di Indonesia. Jurnal SMART (Studi Masyarakat, Religi, dan Tradisi), 10(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18784/smart.v10i1.2214
Nugroho, N. D., Daniel Rabitha, & Ismail. (2023). Preventing Radicalism Through Religious Moderation. Penamas, 36(2), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.31330/penamas.v36i2.678
Ong, W. J. (2002). Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Pamungkas, M. D., Suleman, Z., & Santoso, A. D. (2024). On Digital Ethnography: Nonviolent Campaign Movement of the Instagram Community @Toleransi.Id in Realizing Religious Moderation. Al-Qalam: Jurnal Penelitian Agama dan Sosial Budaya, 30(1), 126–140. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31969/alq.v30i1.1427
Pariaman, D. I. P., Barat, S., Ashadi, A., Lukens-bull, R. A., Valentina, S., Folandra, D., & Valentina, S. (2022). Community Tolerance: Relationship of Muslim Majority and Christian Minority in the Context of Religious Moderation in Padang Pariaman, West Sumatera. Penamas, 35(1), 113–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31330/penamas.v35i1.570
Phillips, P. M. (2020). The Bible, Social Media and Digital Culture. Abingdon: Routledge.
Setia, P., & Haq, M. Z. (2023). Countering Radicalism in Social Media by Campaigning for Religious Moderation. Focus, 4(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26593/focus.v4i1.6571
Stark, R. (2015). The Triumph of Faith: Why the World is More Religious Than Ever. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books.
Stay, J. (2021). TikTok for Dummies. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Sugi, L., Rahman, M. A., & Kamarzaman, M. H. (2023). A Behaviour of Religious Moderation Among Salafi in Ambon. Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion, 8(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18784/analisa.v8i2.2102
Ulinnuha, M. (2022). Implementation of the Concept of Religious Moderation in Private Islamic Higher Education (Pihe). Penamas, 35(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31330/penamas.v35i1.552
Williamson, K., Given, L. M., & Scifleet, P. (2018). Qualitative data analysis. In K. Williamson & G. Johanson (Ed.), Research Methods: Information, Systems, and Contexts (2nd ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Chandos Publishing, Elsevier. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102220-7.00019-4
Yani, Z. (2022). Strengthening Religious Moderation at UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung: Study at Religious Moderation House. Penamas, 35(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31330/penamas.v35i1.531
Yuliawati, E., & Asri, I. (2022). Religious Moderation: An Analysis of Understanding, Internet and Social Media Exposure and Social Interaction Systems. Jurnal The Messenger, 14(2), 158–179. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/themessenger.v14i2.2812
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Otniel Aurelius Nole, Tony Tampake
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
