Negotiating the Impossible: BATNA, Hurting Stalemate, and The Collapse of Turkey–PKK Peace Talks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24090/jimrf.v14i2.13835Keywords:
Turkey–PKK Conflict, Ethnopolitical Negotiation, Hurting Stalemate, BATNA, Peace Process CollapseAbstract
The protracted conflict between the Turkish state and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) remains one of the most enduring ethnopolitical confrontations in modern history. Despite initiatives such as the Oslo Process and the İmralı Talks, negotiations have consistently collapsed. This study examines the roots of these failures by integrating strategic negotiation theories—particularly BATNA and the Hurting Stalemate model—with perspectives from identity politics and collective trauma. Employing qualitative, thematic analysis of secondary sources, it argues that breakdowns cannot be explained solely through material or strategic lenses. Instead, they stem from entrenched ideological discord, symbolic marginalization, and structural asymmetries of power and recognition. The Turkish state’s reliance on coercion and systemic delegitimization of the PKK has impeded equitable dialogue. Conceptually, the article advances an interdisciplinary interpretation of negotiation failures and highlights the necessity of symbolic and psychosocial dimensions. Findings affirm that recognition, narrative pluralism, and legitimacy are essential to sustainable peace.Downloads
References
Adisonmez, U. C. (2019). When conflict traumas fragment: investigating the sociopsychological roots of Turkey’s Intractable conflict. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12631
Andika, S. R., & Hanura, M. (2023). Analisa Kegagalan Upaya Perdamaian Turki Dengan Partiya Karkeren Kurdistan (PKK) Tahun 2009-2015. J. Inter. Relat., 9(2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.14710/jirud.v9i2.38305
Bilgel, F., & Karahasan, B. C. (2016). The Economic Costs of Separatist Terrorism in Turkey. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(2), 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002715576572
Bingöl, O. (2019). Changing Balancing Behaviors in Turkish Foreign Policy During AKP Period (2002-2019). Gazi Akademik Bakış. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=815352
Dag, R. (2018). The spillover effect of the Syrian crisis on the peace process in Turkey. Journal of Asian and African Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909618781647
Duursma, A., & Fliervoet, F. (2020). Fueling Factionalism? The Impact of Peace Processes on Rebel Group Fragmentation in Civil Wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 65(4), 788–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002720958062
Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (2012). Getting to Yes: Negotiating an Agreement Without Giving In (B. PATTON, Ed.; 3rd Editio). Penguin Books.
Hancilar, O. (2016). The Ultimate Enemy for Turkey: PKK. Proceedings of International Academic Conferences. https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/3505898.html
Hayati, E. H. (2017). Kebijakan Politik Mustafa Kemal Ataturk terhadap Suku Kurdi di Turki 1923-1938 M. Buletin Al-Turas, 23(2), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v23i2.6374
International Crisis Group. (2025, January 20). Türkiye’s PKK Conflict: A Visual Explainer. Crisisgroup.Org. https://www.crisisgroup.org/content/turkiyes-pkk-conflict-visual-explainer
Kappmeier, M., & Mercy, A. (2019). The Long Road From Cold War to Warm Peace: Building Shared Collective Memory Through Trust. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 7(1), 525–555. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v7i1.328
Lambourne, W. (2008). Transitional Justice and Peacebuilding after Mass Violence. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 3(1), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijn037
McLeod, L., & O’Reilly, M. (2019). Critical Peace and Conflict Studies: Feminist Interventions. Peacebuilding, 7(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2019.1588457
Nyadera, I. N., & Islam, M. N. (2020). Transnational Operations, International Reactions, and Legitimacy: The Case of Turkey and Saudi Arabia. Contemporary Review of the Middle …. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347798920921965
Ozkahraman, C. (2017). Failure of peace talks between Turkey and the PKK: Victim of traditional Turkish policy or of geopolitical shifts in the Middle East? Contemporary Review of the Middle East. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347798916681332
Savran, A. (2020). The Peace Process between Turkey and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, 2009–2015. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2020.1801243
Schiff, A. (2014). Reaching a Mutual Agreement: Readiness Theory and Coalition Building in the Aceh Peace Process. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 7(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12026
Schwartz, A., & Gilboa, E. (2021). False Readiness: Expanding the Concept of Readiness in Conflict Resolution Theory. International Studies Review, 23(4), 1328–1348. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viab006
Ünal, M. C. (2016). Is it ripe yet? Resolving Turkey’s 30 years of conflict with the PKK. Turkish Studies, 17(1), 91–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2015.1124020
Ünal, M. C., & Uludağ, P. C. (2019). Insisting on Victory. Revista Científica General José María Córdova, 17(28), 891–922. https://doi.org/10.21830/19006586.522
Zartman, I. W. (2000). Ripeness: The hurting stalemate and beyond.
Zartman, I. W. (2008). The Timing of Peace Initiatives:Hurting Stalemates and Ripe Moments. In Contemporary Peacemaking (pp. 22–35). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584556_3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Intan Tiara Kartika, Zulfikar Adjie, Sanri J. Dotutinggi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

