Negotiating Care, Distance, and Well-Being: Psychosocial Dynamics of Transnational Families of Indonesian Migrant Workers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24090/icodev.v7i1.16217Keywords:
Transnational families , Psychosocial well-being, Care negotiation, Social workAbstract
This study explores how care, distance, and psychosocial well-being are negotiated within transnational families of Indonesian migrant workers. While migration has long been recognized as a strategy for improving household economic conditions, less attention has been given to the relational and psychosocial consequences of family separation. Addressing this gap, the study employs a qualitative case study approach in Cilacap Regency, one of Indonesia’s major migrant-sending regions. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis involving migrant workers and their family members, including spouses, children, and grandparents. The findings reveal that ongoing processes of care negotiation shape transnational family life under conditions of distance and constraint. Communication serves as the primary medium of care but is limited by technological barriers, time differences, and work demands, resulting in only partial emotional connection. Family roles are continuously reconfigured, with men negotiating domestic responsibilities and women maintaining caregiving authority from afar. Grandparents emerge as key caregivers, although intergenerational arrangements often create gaps in emotional care. These dynamics contribute to psychosocial strain, particularly among children and caregivers. This study highlights that family well-being in migration contexts is inherently relational and negotiated, underscoring the need for integrated social work interventions that address psychosocial support, digital inclusion, and gendered care dynamics. Keywords: Transnational families; Psychosocial well-being; Care negotiation; Migration; Social work Penelitian ini mengkaji bagaimana praktik pengasuhan, keterpisahan geografis, dan kesejahteraan psikososial dinegosiasikan dalam keluarga pekerja migran Indonesia. Selama ini, migrasi lebih banyak dipahami sebagai strategi peningkatan kesejahteraan ekonomi, sementara dampak relasional dan psikososial akibat keterpisahan keluarga masih kurang mendapat perhatian. Untuk mengisi kesenjangan tersebut, penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus di Kabupaten Cilacap sebagai salah satu daerah pengirim pekerja migran terbesar di Indonesia. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi partisipatif, dan analisis dokumen yang melibatkan pekerja migran serta anggota keluarga yang ditinggalkan, termasuk pasangan, anak, dan kakek-nenek. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kehidupan keluarga transnasional dibentuk oleh proses negosiasi pengasuhan yang berlangsung dalam kondisi keterbatasan dan jarak. Komunikasi menjadi medium utama dalam praktik pengasuhan, namun dibatasi oleh hambatan teknologi, perbedaan waktu, dan tuntutan kerja sehingga menghasilkan kedekatan emosional yang parsial. Peran keluarga mengalami rekonfigurasi, di mana laki-laki menegosiasikan peran domestik, sementara perempuan tetap menjalankan otoritas pengasuhan dari jarak jauh. Kakek-nenek berperan sebagai pengasuh utama, meskipun seringkali muncul kesenjangan dalam pemenuhan kebutuhan emosional anak. Dinamika ini berdampak pada tekanan psikososial, terutama pada anak dan anggota keluarga lainnya. Kata kunci: Keluarga transnasional; Kesejahteraan psikososial; Negosiasi pengasuhan; Migrasi; Pekerjaan sosialReferences
Al Anshor, M. (2016). Perceraian di kalangan buruh migran di Banjarsari, Nusawungu, Cilacap. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 8(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2015.08207
Anisti, A., Tambunan, R. M., Sidharta, V., Sampean, S., & Syatir, S. (2023). Family communication patterns in the era of digital technology. ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(6), 750–756. https://doi.org/10.35877/soshum2225
Anzali, A., Azzahra, E. D., Zulfa, I. E., & Purnomo, A. C. (2025). Transformative corporate social responsibility and the circular economy as a community-based social work intervention. Welfare: Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, 14(2).
Bacigalupe, G., & Cámara, M. (2012). Transnational families and social technologies: Reassessing immigration psychology. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(9), 1425–1438. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2012.698211
Baldassar, L., & Merla, L. (2014). Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care: Understanding mobility and absence in family life. Routledge.
Baldassar, L., Wilding, R., & Baldock, C. (2016). Long-distance care-giving: Transnational families and the provision of care. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(2), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1037259
Boccagni, P. (2013). Caring about migrant care workers: From private obligations to transnational social welfare? Critical Social Policy, 33(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018312465593
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
BP2MI. (2023). Statistik penempatan. https://bp2mi.go.id/statistik-penempatan
BPS. (2020). Banyaknya tenaga kerja Indonesia antar kerja antar negara menurut kabupaten/kota di Jawa Tengah (2017–2019). https://jateng.bps.go.id
BPS Jawa Tengah. (2021). Jumlah pernikahan dan perceraian menurut kabupaten/kota di Provinsi Jawa Tengah 2018–2020.
Bryceson, D. F. (2019). Transnational families negotiating migration and care life cycles across nation-state borders. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(16), 3042–3064. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1547017
Coe, C., & Unger, J. (2011). Transnational families and the care of children. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(2), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2011.521361
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
DeWaard, J., Nobles, J., & Donato, K. M. (2018). Migration and parental absence: A comparative assessment of transnational families in Latin America. Population, Space and Place, 24(7), e2166. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2166
Fadillah, J. (2022). Strategi bertahan hidup setelah cerai gugat (Unpublished thesis). Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.
Fuller-Iglesias, H. R. (2015). The view from back home: Interpersonal dynamics of transnational Mexican families. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(11), 1703–1724. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1022518
Graham, E., & Jordan, L. P. (2011). Migrant parents and the psychological well-being of left-behind children in Southeast Asia. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(4), 763–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00844.x
Han, W., & Hart, J. (2021). Job precarity and economic prospects during the COVID-19 public health crisis. Social Science Quarterly, 102(5), 2394–2411. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13031
Hugo, G. (2005). Migration in the Asia-Pacific region. Global Commission on International Migration.
Izudin, A., Kholili, M., & Umam, K. (2024). The Role of Local Cultural Heritage in Community Empowerment: The Case of Gentur Lantern in Jambudipa Village, Indonesia. Heritage & Society, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2024.2366639
Jordan, L. P., Dito, B., Nobles, J., & Graham, E. (2018). Engaged parenting, gender, and children’s time use in transnational families. Population, Space and Place, 24(7), e2159. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2159
Kirmayer, L. J., Raikhel, E., & Rahimi, S. (2013). Cultures of the internet: Identity, community and mental health. Transcultural Psychiatry, 50(2), 165–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461513490626
Lam, T., & Yeoh, B. S. A. (2018). Migrant mothers, left-behind fathers: The negotiation of gender subjectivities in Indonesia and the Philippines. Gender, Place & Culture, 25(1), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2016.1249349
Larrinaga-Bidegain, N., Gemignani, M., & Hernández-Albújar, Y. (2024). Parents who migrate without their children: Gendered and psychosocial reconfigurations of parenting in transnational families. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 16(4), 857–884. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12577
Li, M. Z., & Stodolska, M. (2021). Leisure as a constraint and a manifesto for empowerment. Leisure Sciences, 44(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2018.1483854
Madianou, M. (2012). Migration and the accentuated ambivalence of motherhood. Global Networks, 12(3), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2012.00352.x
Martone, J., Muñoz, L., Lahey, R., Yoder, L., & Gurewitz, S. (2011). The impact of remittances on transnational families. Journal of Poverty, 15(4), 444–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2011.616462
Ngestiti, K. A. (2025). Navigating social work field placements. Welfare: Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.14421/welfare.2025.141-02
Parreñas, R. S. (2001). Servants of globalization: Women, migration and domestic work. Stanford University Press.
Parreñas, R. S. (2021). Servants of globalization: Migration and domestic work (2nd ed.). Stanford University Press.
Rose, S., & Hiller, S. (2007). From migrant work to community transformation. The Oral History Review, 34(1), 95–142. https://doi.org/10.1525/ohr.2007.34.1.95
Ryan, L., Sales, R., Tilki, M., & Siara, B. (2009). Family strategies and transnational migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830802489176
Shih, K. Y. (2015). Transnational families. In Encyclopedia of Family Studies (pp. 1–7). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs177
Silvey, R. (2006). Consuming the transnational family. Global Networks, 6(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00131.x
Silvey, R., & Parreñas, R. S. (2020). Precarity chains. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(16), 3457–3471. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1592398
Skrbiš, Z. (2008). Transnational families. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 29(3), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256860802169188
Suharto, M. P., & Nurwati, N. (2018). Peran extended family pada anak TKW. Prosiding Penelitian & Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5(2), 165–175.
Suárez-Orozco, C., Todorova, I. L. G., & Louie, J. (2002). Making up for lost time. Family Process, 41(4), 625–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.00625.x
Vuille, M., Bolzman, C., & Durrett, E. H. (2013). Social work practice in transnational family reunification. European Journal of Social Work, 16(3), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2012.729028
Widowati, E., & Cahyati, W. H. (2019). Kejadian kekerasan terhadap anak tenaga kerja Indonesia. Palastren, 12(1), 65–98.
Wijaya, S. W., Watson, J., & Bruce, C. (2023). Virtual ethnography of migrant workers. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(7), 921–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2052184
Wickramage, K., Vearey, J., Zwi, A. B., Robinson, C., & Knipper, M. (2018). Migration and health. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 987. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5932-5
Yuhanita, R. (2019). Faktor-faktor penyebab perceraian di kalangan TKW. UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Zamhir, Z., Ashar, K., & Satria, D. (2023). Analisis migrasi dan kondisi sosial demografi. Jurnal Ekuilibrium, 7(2), 58–77.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arin Kalamika, Khotibul Umam, Idan Ramdani, Pratiwi Kurniawati, Rubangi Shofi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


