Implikasi PPAT sebagai Pejabat Umum dalam Kasus Sertifikat Ganda pada Pengumpulan Data Sporadik

Penulis

  • Muhammad Irham Husni Mubarok Kenotaritiatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
  • Indah Nurlaela Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/el-aqwal.v4i1.12619

Kata Kunci:

land certificate, sporadic data, agrarian conflict, legal responsibility

Abstrak

Duplicate land certificates are a recurring issue in land management in Indonesia and have the potential to trigger serious agrarian conflicts. The Land Deed Making Official (PPAT) plays a critical role in data collection and certificate verification, particularly in the process of drafting deeds for sale and purchase, grants, or other transfers of land rights. However, in several cases, negligence or lack of due diligence by the PPAT during sporadic data collection has led to the issuance of duplicate land certificates. This article examines the legal implications, responsibilities, and preventive measures that must be undertaken by PPATs in addressing duplicate certificate cases, especially those arising from sporadic data collection. Research findings indicate that the primary cause of duplicate certificates is inaccurate data during the sporadic data collection process, compounded by weak oversight and verification by the PPAT. A PPAT may be held legally accountable if proven negligent in the execution of their duties. The legal consequences for a PPAT may include administrative sanctions, liability for damages, and, in certain cases, criminal penalties. Therefore, improving the accuracy and transparency of data collection, along with strict law enforcement, is essential to prevent the recurrence of duplicate land certificate cases in the future.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Aksar, Aksar, Umar Dinata, Ali Ismail Shaleh, Fatimah Az-Zahra, Ambarwati Ambarwati, and Mediana Putri. “Rekonstruksi Penyelesaian Sengketa Sertifikat Ganda Pada Badan Pertanahan Nasional.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 5, no. 3 (2023): 537–49.

Amaliyah, Amaliyah, Muhammad Amar Ma’ruf, Novytha Sary, and Syahril Gunawan Bitu. “Reforma Agraria Dan Penanganan Sengketa Tanah.” Hermeneutika: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 1 (2021): 29–39.

Arba, Muhammad. Hukum Agraria Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.

Arisaputra, Muhammad Ilham. Reforma Agraria Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.

Aulia, Arsiendy. “Prinsip Kehati-Hatian PPAT Dalam Proses Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah Sebagai Perwujudan Kepastian Hukum.” Recital Review 4, no. 1 (2022): 244–78.

Dewandaru, Prasetyo Aryo, Nanik Tri Hastuti, and Fifiana Wisnaeni. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Terhadap Sertifikat Ganda Di Badan Pertanahan Nasional.” Notarius 13, no. 1 (2020): 154–69.

Isnaini, Hatta, and Hendry Dwicahyo Wanda. “Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Peralihan Tanah Yang Belum Bersertifikat.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 24, no. 3 (2017): 467–87.

Kumara, I Made Citra Gada, I Ketut Kasta Arya Wijaya, and Luh Putu Suryani. “Kepastian Hukum Pemegang Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Sistem Hukum Pertanahan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 2, no. 3 (2021): 560–63.

Maula, Bani Syarif, Muhammad Fuad Zain, and Syifaun Nada. “Marital Property in Marriages of Different Nationalities in Indonesia According to National Law and Islamic Law.” El-Aqwal : Journal of Sharia and Comparative Law 3, no. 1 (December 31, 2023): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.24090/el-aqwal.v3i1.10508.

Nugroho, Jati. “Recognition Model of National Legal Pluralism in a Unitary State through the Prismatic Theory Approach.” Jurnal Humaya: Jurnal Hukum, Humaniora, Masyarakat, Dan Budaya 1, no. 2 (2021): 107–15. https://doi.org/10.33830/humaya.v1i2.1861.2021.

Nuriyanto, Nuriyanto. “Urgensi Reforma Agraria; Menuju Penataan Penggunaan Tanah Yang Berkeadilan Sosial.” Jurnal Rontal Keilmuan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan 6, no. 1 (2020): 29–45.

Santoso, Urip. Hukum Agraria: Kajian Komprehenshif. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2017.

Sari, Indah. “Hak-Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Sistem Hukum Pertanahan Di Indonesia Menurut Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria (UUPA).” Jurnal Mitra Manajemen 9, no. 1 (2017).

Setiawan, Agung, Ashari Ashari, Khairul Umam, and Riska Ari Amalia. “Politik Hukum Agraria Indonesia Dalam Arus Globalisasi.” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 3, no. 5 (2023): 10916–29.

Silviana, Ana. “Urgensi Sertipikat Tanah Elektronik Dalam Sistem Hukum Pendaftaran Tanah Di Indonesia.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 4, no. 1 (2021): 51–68.

Supriadi, Supriadi. Hukum Agraria. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2023.

Syah, Mudakir Iskandar. “Sertifikat Tanah Ganda Akibat Lemahnya Data Base Pertanahan.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 4, no. 2 (2018).

Tenrisau, Andi. “Landasan Pengelolaan Pertanahan Dalam Sistem Penataan Agraria Berkelanjutan.” Jurnal Pertanahan 11, no. 2 (2021).

Umbas, Felenvi Olivia, and Budi Santoso. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Dan PPAT Dalam Menjalankan Profesinya.” Notarius 15, no. 2 (2022): 883–92.

Wowor, Fingli. “Fungsi Badan Pertanahan Nasional Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah.” Lex Privatum 2, no. 2 (2014): 95–104.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2025-06-02

Cara Mengutip

Mubarok, M. I. H., & Nurlaela, I. (2025). Implikasi PPAT sebagai Pejabat Umum dalam Kasus Sertifikat Ganda pada Pengumpulan Data Sporadik. Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum Komparatif, 4(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.24090/el-aqwal.v4i1.12619

Terbitan

Volume 4 Issue 1 (2025)

Bagian

Articles

Lisensi

Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Muhammad Irham Husni Mubarok, Indah Nurlaela

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.