Legal Diversity in the Concept of ‘Iddah: Comparative Analysis among Shafi’i, Maliki, Hanafi, and Hanbali Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24090/el-aqwal.v5i1.14946الكلمات المفتاحية:
legal diversity، 'iddah، fiqh، Sunni schools of lawالملخص
This study examines the concept of ‘iddah (waiting period) within Islamic family law through a comparative analysis of the four Sunni schools—Shafi’i, Maliki, Hanafi, and Hanbali. Rooted in the Qur’an and Sunnah, ‘iddah serves multiple juridical and ethical purposes, including the preservation of lineage (ḥifẓ al-nasab), clarification of paternity, and maintenance of moral and social order following marital dissolution. Despite unanimous recognition of its obligation, the four schools exhibit methodological diversity in interpreting its duration, commencement, and conditions. This research, employing a qualitative, doctrinal, and comparative approach (fiqh muqāran), reveals that juristic differences arise from linguistic ambiguities, contextual considerations, and distinctive uṣūl al-fiqh methodologies—textualism, rational analogy, or welfare-based reasoning. Rather than reflecting contradiction, such ikhtilāf (diversity) demonstrates the epistemic richness and adaptability of Islamic law. The findings underscore that all schools converge on shared maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah—justice, lineage protection, and compassion—while differing in procedural applications. The study concludes that recognizing classical pluralism can inform contemporary legal codifications and family law reforms in Muslim societies. It affirms that the vitality of Islamic jurisprudence lies in harmonizing unity of purpose with diversity of interpretation, ensuring Sharia’s continued relevance in evolving social contexts.التنزيلات
المراجع
Abdul-Rauf, Muhammad. Marriage in Islam. Alexandria: Al-Saadawi, 1995.
Al-Jauziyyah, Ibn Qayyim. Al-Turuq Al-Hukmiyyah Fi Al-Siyasah Al-Syariyyah. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1995.
Al-Nawawi, Abu Zakariyya Yahya ibn Syarf. Al-Majmūʿ Sharḥ Al-Muhadhdhab. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1977.
Al-Qardawi, Yusuf. Dirāsah Fi Fiqh Maqāṣid Al-Syarī’ah: Bayna Al-Maqāṣid Al-Kulliyah Wa Al-Nuṣūṣ Al-Juz’iyyah. Cairo: Dār al-Syurūq, 2006.
Al-Shāṭibi, Abū Isḥāq. Al-Muwāfaqāt Fī Uṣūl Al-Sharī’ah. Edited by Izzah Darwazah. Cairo: al-Hay’ah al-Miṣriyyah al-’Āmmah li al-Kitāb, 2006.
Ali, Haseeb, Aftab Hussain, Muhammad Islam, and Hafiz Muhammad Azeem. “Dissolution of Marriage: Exploring Various Modalities of Ending Marriage in Islamic Law.” Society, Law and Policy Review 1, no. 1 (2022): 45–55.
Bani, Lawal Mohammad, and Hamza A. Pate. “Dissolution of Marriage (Divorce) under Islamic Law.” Journal of Law Policy & Globalization 42 (2015): 138.
Hallaq, Wael B. An Introduction to Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Hilal, Syamsul, and Sumper Mulia Harahap. “’Iddah in the View of Islam and Feminists.” Al-’Adalah 18, no. 2 (2021): 213–32.
Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. “Maqāṣid Al-Sharī’ah: The Objectives of Islamic Law.” Islamic Studies 38, no. 2 (1999): 193–208.
Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. Shari’ah Law: An Introduction. Oxford: Simon and Schuster, 2008.
Khadduri, Majid. “Marriage in Islamic Law: The Modernist Viewpoints.” In Issues in Islamic Law, edited by Mashood A. Baderin, 3–8. London: Routledge, 2017.
Manzur, Ibn. Lisan Al-’Arab. Beirut: Dar Ihya Turath Arabiy, 1997.
Maula, Bani Syarif. “Kajian Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah Dengan Pendekatan Maqasid Al-Syari’ah.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 8, no. 2 (2014): 233–46.
Nasir, Mohamad Abdun. “Negotiating Muslim Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia: Integration and Conflict in Islamic Law.” Mazahib: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam 21, no. 2 (2022): 155–86.
Nuroniyah, Wardah. “Diskursus ’Iddah Berpersepktif Gender: Membaca Ulang ’Iddah Dengan Metode Dalalah Al-Nass.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 12, no. 2 (December 5, 2018): 193–216. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v12i2.1745.
Omar, Shagufta. “Dissolution of Marriage: Practices, Laws and Islamic Teachings.” Policy Perspectives 4, no. 1 (2007): 91–117.
Qudamah, Al-Imam Ibn. Al-Mughni. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 2004.
Romadoni, Rahayu Mulia. “The Iddah Period as a Reason for Cancellation of Marriage.” Lentera Hukum 6, no. 2 (2019): 235–52. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v6i2.11253.
Rusyd, Ibn. Bidāyah Al-Mujtahid Wa Nihāyah Al-Muqtasid. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1968.
Salleh, Fatimah, Noorul Huda Sahari, Siti Khadijah Ab Manan, Che Zahrah Abdullah, and Zaharah Yahya. “Maqasid Shariah in the Guidelines for Iddah of Women upon Husband’s Death.” Journal of Contempory Islamic Studies 6, no. 1 (2020): 77–94.
Salsalbila, Califta Aria, and Putri Maha Dewi. “Tinjauan Hukum Islam Terhadap Akibat Hukum Perceraian Karena Ketidakmampuan: Suami Menafkahi Istri.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 5, no. 2 (2022): 170–80. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v5i2.6356.
Sassi, Nawel Ben, and Nadia Ahmad. “Divorce in Saudi Personal Status Law: A Delicate Balance between Individual Rights and Family Stability.” Legal Transformation in Muslim Societies 2, no. 1 (2025): 62–80.
Shalihah, Fatimah, and Muhammad Miftah Irfan. “Jasser Auda’s Maqasid Sharia Application in the ’Iddah for Career Women.” Al-Qisthu: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum 20, no. 1 (2022): 12–26.
Suyūtī, Jalāl al-Dīn ‘Abd al-Rahman al-. Al-Asybah Wa Al-Nazā’ir. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-Arabi, 1971.
Zuhaili, Wahbah al-. Al-Fiqh Al-Islami Wa Adillatuhu. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 2002.
التنزيلات
منشور
كيفية الاقتباس
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2026 Kummil Lailaturrohmah

هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.





