Kerjasama Perpustakaan FISIP Unpad dengan Bank BRI melalui Fasilitas Creative Hub and Knowledge Center
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24090/jkki.v6i1.9712Keywords:
collaboration; library; corporate social responsibility (csr)Abstract
This research was conducted to find out how collaboration can be established between the Library of the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran (FISIP Unpad) and Bank BRI in building the Creative Hub and Knowledge Center facility. In recent times, collaboration is a necessity, it is no longer an optional consideration. Considering the important role of collaboration between one institution and another, especially collaboration in academic libraries, I am interested in bringing up this topic. In the midst of many limitations and challenges faced by academic libraries, collaboration with other parties can be an alternative solution to overcome this problem. This research method used a qualitative approach with data collection techniques through observation and in-depth interviews with related parties that knew how this collaboration came to existence. The result shows that this collaboration is a form of BRI Bank's Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) to the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran (FISIP Unpad) through the Creative Hub & Knowledge Center facility with various stages of collaboration. The existence of this new facility brings many benefits to the academic community of Universitas Padjadjaran as well as Bank BRI.Downloads
References
Atkinson, J. (Ed.). (2018). Collaboration and the academic library: Internal and external, local and regional, national and international. Chandos Publishing.
Atkinson, J. (2019). Collaboration by academic libraries: What are the benefits, what are the constraints, and what do you need to do to be successful?. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 25(1), 1-7.
Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and practice, 2, 1-10.
Corrall, S., & Jolly, L. (2019). Innovations in learning and teaching in academic libraries: Alignment, collaboration, and the social turn. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 25(2-4), 113-128.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
Firmansyah, M., & Masrun, M. (2021). Esensi Perbedaan Metode Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif. Elastisitas-Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 3(2), 156-159.
Galib, A. A. C., Arham, A., Ismaya, I., & Haruddin, H. (2022). Strategi Membangun Kerja Sama dalam Upaya Peningkatan Layanan Perpustakaan. Maktabatun: Jurnal Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 2(2), 27-32.
Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., & de Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them. Human reproduction, 31(3), 498-501.
Istiqomah, Z. (2019). Mengembangkan Kerjasama di Perpustakaan Melalui Corporate Social Responsibility. Bibliotika: Jurnal Kajian Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 3(1), 32-39.
Khan, S. N. (2014). Qualitative research method: Grounded theory. International journal of business and management, 9(11), 224-233.
Saleh, A. R., & Komalasari, R. (2014). Pengertian Perpustakaan dan Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Perpustakaan. Manajemen Perpustakaan, 45.
Suratmi, I. (2021). Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Perpustakaan Melalui Kerja Sama Antar Perpustakaan. ABDI PUSTAKA: Jurnal Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan, 1(2), 55-59.
Syarif, V. D. P. (2020). Peningkatan kerjasama perpustakaan perguruan tinggi dalam pelayanan informasi. Ecodunamika, 3(2).
Tai, F. M., & Chuang, S. H. (2014). Corporate social responsibility. Ibusiness, 6(03), 117.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Wisna Romdona
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
