Comparison Of Discovery Learning and Reciprocal Teaching Learning Models On The Mathematical Critical Thingking

Authors

  • Sofhianti Ardini Universitas Islam Negeri Prof.K.H Saifuddin Zurhi Purwokerto
  • Srie Kuntari Mts Ma'arif NU 1 Wangon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/ijrme.v2i2.11537

Keywords:

Discovery Learning, Reciprocal teaching Learning Model, Critical Thinking

Abstract

Mathematical critical thinking ability is a very important ability and must be possessed by students. This study aims to compare discovery learning and reciprocal teaching models on students' mathematical critical thinking skills. This research was conducted on VIII grade students of MTs Ma'arif NU 1 Wangon with a sample of VIII A and VIII D classes totaling 68 students. The sampling technique used simple random sampling where the sampling process was taken in a simple event with a lottery. The research was conducted by giving two different treatments to two classes, experimental class I with discovery learning model and experiment II with reciprocal teaching model. The research method used is quasi experimental design. While the data collection method uses tests in the form of pretest and posttest description questions. Data analysis techniques are using normality test, homogeneity test and hypothesis testing. The average posttest result in experimental class I is 81.3 which is in the very high category and the average posttest result in experimental class II is 73.4 which is in the medium category. Based on the analysis of the t test of two independent samples, the significance value is 0.000 which is smaller than the level limit of 0.05. So it can be concluded that the results of this study show that there is a significant difference in the ability to think critically mate. Keywords:  Comparison, Discovery learning, Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills, Reciprocal Teaching.

References

Ahyar, H., Andriani, H., Sukmana, D. J., Hardani, S. P., MS, N. H. A., GC, B., Helmina Andriani, M. S., Fardani, R. A., Ustiawaty, J., & Utami, E. F. (2020). Buku metode penelitian kualitatif & kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: CV. Pustaka Ilmu.

Asih, K. S., Isnarto, Sukestiyarno, & Wardono. (2019). Resiliensi Matematis pada Pembelajaran Discovery Learning dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Komunikasi Matematika. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2, 862–868.

Daniar Paramita, R. W., Rizal, N., & Sulistyan, R. B. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Edisi 3. Widya Gama Press.

Firdiansyah, M. S. (2015). Manajemen Pengelolaan Wahana Rekreasi Olahraga Di Wisata Water Blaster Semarang Tahun 2013. ACTIVE: Journal of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreation, 4(2).

Girsang, B. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dengan Model Program For International Student Assesment (PISA) Konten Quantitiy Pada Materi Himpunan di Kelas VII SMP HKBP Sidorame Medan. Sepren.

Hasratuddin, S. (2013). Membangun Karakter Melalui Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika PARADIKMA, 6(2), 130–141.

Hidayat, D. (2018). Penerapan Reciprocal Teaching Untuk Meningkatkan Berpikir Kritis Dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa MA. Jurnal Derivat: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 1–8.

Matondang, Z. (2009). Validitas dan reliabilitas suatu instrumen penelitian. Jurnal Tabularasa, 6(1), 87–97.

Maulana, M. (2017). Konsep dasar matematika dan pengembangan kemampuan berpikir kritis-kreatif. UPI Sumedang Press.

Munandar, U. (2020). Mengembangkan bakat dan kreativitas anak sekolah.

Nasional, I. D. P. (2003). Undang-undang republik Indonesia nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang sistem pendidikan nasional.

Oktaviani, B. A. Y., Mawardi, M., & Astuti, S. (2018). Perbedaan model Problem Based Learning dan Discovery Learning ditinjau dari hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas 4 SD. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 8(2), 132–141.

Purwanto, P. (2018). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Penelitian Ekonomi Syariah. Magelang: Staiapress.

Rochaminah, S. (2008). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Penemuan Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Mahasiswa Calon Guru. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Rodliyah, I. (2021). Pengantar Dasar Statistika Dilengkapi Analisis Dengan Bantuan Software SPSS.

Sahir, S. H. (2021). Metodologi penelitian. Penerbit KBM Indonesia.

Sanjaya, W. (2011). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan.

Seviarica, H. P., Akhmad, F., Berliyana, A. S., Atmojo, S. T., & Fauzi, R. (2021). Karakteristik dan Pengembangan Pelayanan Pendidikan Islam Anak Tunadaksa. ANWARUL, 1(1), 102–120.

Sianturi, R. (2022). Uji homogenitas sebagai syarat pengujian analisis. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains Sosial, Dan Agama, 8(1), 386–397.

Sugiono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. 14.

Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D.

Susanto, A. (2019). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran di sekolah dasar.

Umam, K. (2018). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa melalui pembelajaran reciprocal teaching. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia, 3(2), 57–61.

Usmadi, U. (2020). Pengujian persyaratan analisis (Uji homogenitas dan uji normalitas). Inovasi Pendidikan, 7(1).

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Ardini, S., & Kuntari, S. (2024). Comparison Of Discovery Learning and Reciprocal Teaching Learning Models On The Mathematical Critical Thingking. International Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 2(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.24090/ijrme.v2i2.11537

Issue

Section

Articles