Justice Collaborator’s Position and Function on Witness Protection’s Rights as a Suspect from the Perspective of Criminal Law in Indonesia

Ema Mar’ati Sholecha; Ahmat Saiful; Sheilla Yunika; Hariyanto Hariyanto; Norhaiden Unsil

doi:10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.7246

Authors

Ema Mar’ati Sholecha Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kudus, Indonesia
Ahmat Saiful Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kudus, Indonesia
Sheilla Yunika Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kudus, Indonesia
Hariyanto Hariyanto Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3905-8851
Norhaiden Unsil Departement of Social Sciences, Philippine Military Academy, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.7246

Keywords:

Suspect; witness protection; justice collaborator; Human Rights; Criminal Law.

Abstract

To handle a specific criminal act, a justice collaborator is greatly required. The concept and term of justice collaborator is something new in Indonesia. This method is practically used to eradicate an organized crime. Both conceptual and statutory approaches were used in this research. Juridical-normative techniques were implemented to descriptively explain the existing problems. This research aimed to deeply and conceptually examine justice collaborator’s position and function in the perspective of Human Rights to protect and provide special treatments to the main actors in cooperating with law enforcement officials (justice collaborators) against an organized crime. The position of justice collaborator either as a witness or suspect to provide information in court and then used as a judge's consideration is to mitigate the sentence to be imposed. This collaboration can provide various benefits, so that law enforcement officials can fight against serious criminal acts. Thus, a justice collaborator has a specific rule (lex specialis derogerat lex generalis) to guide law enforcers, such as police officers, prosecutors, and judges to uncover a specific crime committed by a syndicate deliberately violating laws in very systematic and organized ways.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amin, Rahman. “Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Saksi Pelaku Yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator) Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Sasana (2020). https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v6i2.271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v6i2.271

Aranda, Yogi. “Faktor-Faktor Kejahatan Pembunuhan Berencana Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak Terhadap Anak.” Ius Poenale 1, no 2, (2020). https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v1i2.2065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v1i2.2065

Ariyanti, Dwi Oktafia, and Nita Ariyani. “Model Pelindungan Hukum Terhadap Justice Collaborator Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 27, no. 2 (2020): 328–344; https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss2.art6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss2.art6

Benuf, Kornelius, Siti Mahmudah, and Ery Agus Priyono. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Keamanan Data Konsumen Financial Technology Di Indonesia.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 2 (2019): 145–160. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2019.v3.i2.p145-160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2019.v3.i2.p145-160

Hafid, Zhulfiana Pratiwi. “Justice Collaborator Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban.” Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan dan Hukum Keluarga Islam 6, no. 1, (2019). https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.v6i1.9457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.v6i1.9457

Hikmawati, Puteri. “Upaya Perlindungan Whistleblower Dan Justice Collabolator Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Negara Hukum : Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan 4, no. 1, (2013): 87–104. https://jurnal.dpr.go.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/197.

Jupri. “Reward Keringanan Saksi Pidana Bagi Justice Collaborator Perkara Korupsi.” Jurnal Transformative 4, no. 1, (2018).

Karuniawan, F. “Konsep Whistleblower Dan Justice Collaborator Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jatiswara 32, no. 2 (2017). https://jatiswara.unram.ac.id/index.php/js/article/view/120

Nyoman, Ni, Rina Desi, Anak Agung, and Sagung Laksmi. “Justice Collaborator Dalam Pengungkapan Kasus Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan.” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 5, no. 1 (2023): 8–13. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.5.1.2023.8-13

Pieter, Salvadoris, and Erni Dwita Silambi. “Pembuktian Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Ditinjau Dari Kitab Udang-Undang Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Restorative Justice 3, no. 1, (2019). https://doi.org/10.35724/jrj.v3i1.1940 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35724/jrj.v3i1.1940

Pratama, Widhy Andrian. “Penegakan Hukuman Mati Terhadap Pembunuhan Berencana.” SIGn Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 1 (2019): 29–41. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i1.34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i1.34

Pusparini, Ni Luh Made Dwi, A. A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi, and I Made Minggu Widyantara. “Urgensi Saksi Pelaku Yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator) Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum 1, no. 1, (2020). https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.1.1.2207.179-185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.1.1.2207.179-185

Riyadi, Sugeng, and Beny Timor Prasetyo. “Kebijakan Moderasi Pidana Mati Dalam RUU KUHP Perspektif Nilai-Nilai Pancasila.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi Konstitusi 4, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v4i2.5329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v4i2.5329

Rusli, Tami, and Gustian Sapta Ningrat. “Penerapan Justice Collaborator Dalam Pemidanaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika Berdasarkan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2011 ( Studi Putusan Nomor 90 / Pid . Sus / 2022 / Pn . Liw ).” Pagaruyuang Law Journal 6, no. 2 (2023): 235–248. https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v0i0.4068

Semendawai, Abdul Haris. “Penetapan Status Justice Collaborator Bagi Tersangka Atau Terdakwa Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 3, no. 3 (2017): 468–490. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v3.n3.a2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v3.n3.a2

Sirait, Adi Syahputra. “Kedudukan Dan Efektivitas Justice Collaborator Di Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana.” Jurnal el-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Pranata Sosial 5, no. 2, (2020). https://doi.org/10.24952/el-qonuniy.v5i2.2148 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/el-qonuniy.v5i2.2148

Sitohang, Novitha. “Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Justice Collaborator Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 430 K/Pid.Sus/2018.” Jurnal Hukum Adigama 4, no. 1, (2021).https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v4i1.11244

Sugiri, Bambang, Nurini Aprilianda, and Hanif Hartadi. “The Position of Convict as Justice Collaborator in Revealing Organized Crime.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 2, (2021). https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v8n2.a5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v8n2.a5

Susanto, IKHP, and I K Suardita. “Peran Penting Justice Collaborator Dalam Pengungkapan Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Kertha Wicara Fakultas Hukum 6, no. 2, (2017). https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthawicara/article/view/26573

Tang, Mohammad. “Kajian Yuridis Implikasi Justice Collaborator Terhadap Perkara Pidana.” Tadulako Master Law Journal 5, no. 1 (2021). http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/TMLJ/article/view/14863

Triwanto, Triwanto, and Esti Aryani. “The Urgency of Granting Authority to Assess Corruption Justice Collaborators.” Bestuur 8, no. 1, (2020). https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v8i1.42720 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v8i1.42720

Wijaya, Firman. “Rekonstruksi Keadilan Dalam Pengungkapan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Whistleblower Dan Justice Collaborator.” Jurnal Ilmiah Widya 3, no. 4, (2017). http://e-journal.jurwidyakop3.com/index.php/jurnal-ilmiah/article/view/260