Analysis of the Wa’d Ijarah Muntahiyah Bi al-Tamlik (IMBT) Contract From the Perspective of Islamic Law and Indonesian Civil Law

Suprapdi

doi:10.24090/ijtimaiyya.v7i2.7170

Authors

Suprapdi UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/ijtimaiyya.v7i2.7170

Keywords:

Ijarah Muntahiyah Bi al-Tamlik, Islamic Law, Civil Law

Abstract

Akad Ijarah Muntahiyah Bi al-Tamlik (IMBT) is a lease agreement that ends with the transfer of property rights by way of sale and purchase or grants at the end of the lease period. The ijarah contract and the sale and purchase contract are connected with a promise. Based on the DSN-MUI fatwa number: 27/DSN-MUI/III/2002 concerning IMBT, the promise (wa'ad) is non-binding, thus causing legal uncertainty for LKS and customers. Then the DSN-MUI issued a fatwa number: 85/DSN-MUI/XII/2012. Then the promise (wa'ad) in the IMBT contract became binding (mulzim). Of course, this has an impact on the occurrence of ta'alluq risk and has the potential to meet conditional buying and selling. This research uses normative juridical methods with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the analysis show that the legal status of fulfilling promises (wa'ad) in every Sharia transaction and business is binding (mulzim) and has caused many benefits for the Islamic economic community, such as legal certainty and guaranteed contract continuity, especially in the IMBT contract. Viewed from the point of view of Indonesian Civil Law, IMBT contracts or contracts are included in non-named agreements. This is contained in Article 1319, which arises from the principle of freedom of contract (Article 1338), and IMBT contracts also meet the requirements of valid agreements as contained in Article 1320 of the Civil Code and the legal consequences caused by IMBT contracts, namely rights and obligations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, Z. (2010). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Syarat Sah Dan Unsur-Unsur Dalam Suatu Perjanjian. Jurnal Lex Specialis, 11, 20–25.

Adiwarman Karim. (2008). Bank Islam (Analisis Fiqih dan Keuangan). RajaGrafindo Persada. https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Bank_Islam/Z77PAQAACAAJ?hl=id

Andi, A. K. (2019). Ijarah Muntahiya Bittamlik Sebagai Solusi Ekonomi Kerakyatan. ACTIVA; Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 2(2), 22–43. http://www.jurnal.stitnualhikmah.ac.id/index.php/activa/article/view/489

Anshori, A. G. (2009). Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Arwan, F. M. (2009). Ijarah Muntahiya Bittamlik sebagai Kontruksi Hukum Perjanjian Sewa-Beli dalam Ekonomi Syariah.

Azwar Iskandar, & Khaerul Aqbar. (2019). Reposisi Praktik Ekonomi Islam : Studi Kritis Praktik Ekonomi Islam di Indonesia. Nukhbatul ’Ulum, 5(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.36701/nukhbah.v5i1.68 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36701/nukhbah.v5i1.68

Daffa Muhammad, Erina Azzahra, M. P. (2017). Analisis Akad Ijarah Muntahiya Bittamlik Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif di Indonesia. An-Nisbah: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 3(2), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.21274/an.2017.3.2.255-276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21274/an.2017.3.2.255-276

DSN MUI. (2002). FATWA DSN MUI Nomor: 27/DSN-MUI/III/2002 Tentang Al-Ijarah Al-Mutahiyah bi Al-Tamlik. April, 16–18. https://dsnmui.or.id/kategori/fatwa/page/12/

Farida, L. (2016). Implikasi Fatwa Dsn-Mui No. 85/Dsn-Mui/Xii/2012 Terhadap Transaksi Ijarah Muntahiya Bittamlik. http://repository.ub.ac.id/108739/

Gemala Dewi, dkk. (2018). Hukum perikatan Islam di Indonesia - Google Books (Cetakan ke). PRENADAMEDIA GROUP. https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Hukum_Perikatan_Islam_di_Indonesia/HONUDwAAQBAJ?hl=id&gbpv=1&dq=Gemala+Dewi,+Wirdyaningsih,+dkk,+Hukum+Perikatan+Islam+di+Indonesia,+Kencana,+Jakarta,+2007&printsec=frontcover

Gumanti, R. (2012). Syarat Sahnya Perjanjian (Ditinjau Dari KUHPerdata) Retna Gumanti Abstrak. Jurnal Pelangi Ilmu, 5(1), 2.

Ismail. (2011). Perbankan Syariah. Kencana.

Luhur, M. B. (2020). Analisis Hukum Wa’ad IMBT (Ijarah Muntahiyah Bittamlik) Dalam Fatwa DSN MUI (Dewan Syari’ah Nasional – Majelis Ulama ’ Indonesia) Berdasarkan Kaidah Fiqhiyyah Irtikaabu Akhaffi al-Dhararain. UIN Syarif Hidayahtullah Jakarta.

M. Roesli, Sarbini, B. N. (2019). Kedudukan Perjanjian Baku Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15, 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v15i1.2260

Manan, A. (2016). Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Dalam Perspektif Kewenangan Peradilan Agama (Suwito (ed.); Cetakan ke).

Muayyad, U. (2015). Asas-asas perjanjian dalam hukum perjanjian islam. ’Anil Islam, 8(1), 1–24.

Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. In T. M. U. Press (Ed.), News.Ge (2020th ed.). Mataram University Press.

Muhammad, A. (1992). Hukum Perikatan. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Munib, A. (2018). HUKUM ISLAM DANMUAMALAH (Asas-asas hukum Islam dalam bidang muamalah). Al-Ulum : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pemikiran Ke Islaman, 5(1), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.31102/alulum.5.1.2018.72-80 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31102/alulum.5.1.2018.72-80

Naja, D. (2011). Akad Bank Syariah. Pustaka Yustisia.

Nurachmad. (2010). Buku Pintar Memahami dan Membuat Surat Perjanjian. Transmedia Pustaka.

Ri, A. (2011). Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah. Mahkamah Agung.

Syarifuddin, A. (2009). Ushul Fiqh. Logos Wacana Ilmu.

Zed, M. (2004). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Metode_Penelitian_Kepustakaan/zG9sDAAAQBAJ?hl=id&gbpv=1&dq=mestika+zed+metode+penelitian+kepustakaan&printsec=frontcover