The Role of Judges in Guaranteeing Legal Certainty and Justice: An Analysis to the Application of Judicial Independence Principle in Criminal Cases in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24090/icms.2019.2574Keywords:
the role of judges, legal certainty, justice, the principle of judical independence, criminal justice systemAbstract
The duty and obligation of a state based on law is to provide protection for the public from all possible crimes, so that the state has a role in conducting prevention and repression of crime, and this cannot be separated from the implementation of criminal law by the state, as a tool to protect the public. The authority of the state to provide criminal sanctions is then delegated to law enforcement officers working in a system known as the Criminal Justice System. The criminal justice system itself is strongly influenced by the community environment and the field of human life. Therefore, the criminal justice system will always experience interaction, interconnection, and interdependence with its environment and sub-systems of the criminal justice system itself. One of the supporting sub-systems that have a very important role in implementing the criminal justice system is the court, which contains judges who are authorized by law to adjudicate. Judges in their capacity as authorities in the legal field have freedom as a form of independence in carrying out their duties. This independence does not mean that judges are freed from all obligations and responsibilities, but the independence of judges has the meaning of their existence as bearers of moral responsibility for upholding justice. This paper discusses the role of judges in ensuring legal certainty and justice in society, especially in handling criminal cases. This paper uses normative and philosophical analysis to the application of judicial independence principle in adjudicating criminal cases in the Indonesian criminal justice system.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Adonara, F. F. (2015). Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara sebagai Amanat Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 217-236.
Ariyanti, V. (2015). Implementasi Asas Legalitas dan Retroaktif tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Perspektif Hukum Islam, 167-177.
Ariyanti, V. (2017). Kedudukan Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia dan Hukum Pidana Islam. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 247-262.
Ariyanti, V. (2018). Indonesia's Criminal Law Policy on the Victim of Narcotics Abuse in the Perspective of Victimology. Veteran Law Review, 32-49.
Ashworth, A. (2005). Sentencing and Criminal Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Budiardjo, M. (1982). Dasar-dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Fuady, M. (2003). Aliran Hukum Kritis Paradigma Ketidakberdayaan Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Hartanti, E. (2007). Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hiariej, E. O. (2009). Asas-Asas Legalitas dan Penemuan Hukum dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Airlangga.
Kamil, A. (2012). Filsafat Kebebasan Hakim. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Kartono. (1982). Peradilan Bebas. Jakarta: PT. Pradnya Paramita.
M. Manullang, E. F. (2007). Menggapai Hukum Berkeadilan. Jakarta: Penerbit Kompas.
Mas, M. (2014). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, 1st ed. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Moerad, P. (2005). Pembelajaran Hukum Melalui Putusan Pengadilan dalam Perkara Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Pontier, J. A. (2008). Penemuan Hukum, translated: B. Arief Sidharta. Bandung: Jendela Mas Pustaka.
Rahadjo, S. (1996). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Rahardjo, S. (2006). Ilmu Hukum, 6th ed. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Rahardjo, S. (2006). Membedah Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Penerbit Kompas.
Rasjidi, M., & Cawidu, H. (1998). Islam untuk Disiplin Ilmu Filsafat. Jakarta: 1998.
Rifai, A. (2011). Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Setyanegara, E. (2013). Kebebasan Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara dalam Konteks Pancasila (Ditinjau dari Keadilan Substantif). Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 436-468.
Suseno, F. M. (1983). Etika Hukum: Masalah-Masalah Pokok Filsafat Moral. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Sutiyoso, B. (2015). Metode Penemuan Hukum (Upaya Mewujudkan Hukum yang Pasti dan Berkeadilan), 1st ed. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Taufiq, M. (2014). Keadilan Substansial Memangkas Rantai Birokrasi Hukum. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Udjan, A. A. (2001). Keadilan dan Demokrasi: Telaah terhadap Filsafat Politik John Rawls. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Umam, A. (2010). Penerapan Pidana Minimum Khusus. Varia Peradilan, 16.
Witanto, D. Y., & Kutawaringin, A. N. (2013). Diskresi Hakim: Sebuah Instrument Menegakkan Keadilan Substantive dalam Perkara-perkara Pidana. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Zulfa, E. A., & Adji, I. S. (2011). Pergeseran Paradigma Pemidanaan. Bandung: Luguk Agung.
Ariyanti, V. (2015). Implementasi Asas Legalitas dan Retroaktif tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Perspektif Hukum Islam, 167-177.
Ariyanti, V. (2017). Kedudukan Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia dan Hukum Pidana Islam. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 247-262.
Ariyanti, V. (2018). Indonesia's Criminal Law Policy on the Victim of Narcotics Abuse in the Perspective of Victimology. Veteran Law Review, 32-49.
Ashworth, A. (2005). Sentencing and Criminal Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Budiardjo, M. (1982). Dasar-dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Fuady, M. (2003). Aliran Hukum Kritis Paradigma Ketidakberdayaan Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Hartanti, E. (2007). Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hiariej, E. O. (2009). Asas-Asas Legalitas dan Penemuan Hukum dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Airlangga.
Kamil, A. (2012). Filsafat Kebebasan Hakim. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Kartono. (1982). Peradilan Bebas. Jakarta: PT. Pradnya Paramita.
M. Manullang, E. F. (2007). Menggapai Hukum Berkeadilan. Jakarta: Penerbit Kompas.
Mas, M. (2014). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, 1st ed. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Moerad, P. (2005). Pembelajaran Hukum Melalui Putusan Pengadilan dalam Perkara Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Pontier, J. A. (2008). Penemuan Hukum, translated: B. Arief Sidharta. Bandung: Jendela Mas Pustaka.
Rahadjo, S. (1996). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Rahardjo, S. (2006). Ilmu Hukum, 6th ed. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Rahardjo, S. (2006). Membedah Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Penerbit Kompas.
Rasjidi, M., & Cawidu, H. (1998). Islam untuk Disiplin Ilmu Filsafat. Jakarta: 1998.
Rifai, A. (2011). Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Setyanegara, E. (2013). Kebebasan Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara dalam Konteks Pancasila (Ditinjau dari Keadilan Substantif). Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 436-468.
Suseno, F. M. (1983). Etika Hukum: Masalah-Masalah Pokok Filsafat Moral. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Sutiyoso, B. (2015). Metode Penemuan Hukum (Upaya Mewujudkan Hukum yang Pasti dan Berkeadilan), 1st ed. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Taufiq, M. (2014). Keadilan Substansial Memangkas Rantai Birokrasi Hukum. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Udjan, A. A. (2001). Keadilan dan Demokrasi: Telaah terhadap Filsafat Politik John Rawls. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Umam, A. (2010). Penerapan Pidana Minimum Khusus. Varia Peradilan, 16.
Witanto, D. Y., & Kutawaringin, A. N. (2013). Diskresi Hakim: Sebuah Instrument Menegakkan Keadilan Substantive dalam Perkara-perkara Pidana. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Zulfa, E. A., & Adji, I. S. (2011). Pergeseran Paradigma Pemidanaan. Bandung: Luguk Agung.
Downloads
Published
2019-04-12
How to Cite
Ariyanti, V. (2019). The Role of Judges in Guaranteeing Legal Certainty and Justice: An Analysis to the Application of Judicial Independence Principle in Criminal Cases in Indonesia. International Conference of Moslem Society, 3, 201–209. https://doi.org/10.24090/icms.2019.2574
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
ICMS 2019
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
