Otoritas Mahkamah Syar'iyah di Aceh dalam Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Pasca Penegsahan Qanun No 11 Tahun 2018 Lembaga Keuangan Syariah di Aceh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24090/eluqud.v1i2.7574Keywords:
Authority of Sharia Court; Execution; Fiduciary GuaranteeAbstract
Sharia Economic Disputes in Aceh Province after the enactment of regulation No. 11 of 2018 concerning Sharia Financial Institutions are increasing. Fiduciary Guarantee as one of the guarantees in the form of a murabahah agreement contract between Islamic financial institutions and customers is also often colored by disputes in Aceh, the increasing number of disputes in the form of fiduciary guarantees increasingly makes the Syar'iyah Court of Absolute competence has a big role and responsibility in adjudicating sharia economic disputes in Aceh. This study aims to determine the authority of the Syar'iyah Court in Aceh in adjudicating and deciding various Sharia Economic dispute issues in Aceh as well as the factors that cause customers to dispute and Islamic financial institutions to seize collateral both through litigation and non-litigation channels. This research method uses a form of qualitative research with case study research techniques. The types of data collected are primary and secondary data. The findings are for the government and Islamic Financial Institutions to mitigate more quickly related to potential sharia economic disputes and the Syar'iyah Court has the authority to execute fiduciary guarantees by means of creditors making applications to local courts.References
Aufina, Z. “Akibat Hukum Bagi Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Terbitnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Tentang Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia,” J. Judic. Rev., 2020, doi: 10.37253/jjr.v22i1.772
Devita, Irma. Hukum Jaminan Perbankan. Jakarta: Mizan Pustaka. 2008
Ibrahim, Johny. Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayu Media Publishing, 2007.
J. Satrio, Parate Eksekusi Sebagai Sarana Mengatasi Kredit Macet, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1993.
Mulyadi, Kartini dan Gunawan, Widjaya. Hak Istimewa, Gadai dan Hipotek. Jakarta: Prenada Media. 2005.
Narboko, Cholid dan Abu Achmadi. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Bumi Pustaka, 1997.
Raharjo, Handri. Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Yustisia. 2009.
Remy Syahdeini, Sutan. Kejahatan dan Tindak Pidana Komputer. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti. 2009.
Rully Akbar, Perlindungan Hukum bagi Kreditor pada Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia dalam Praktek, dikutip dari http://eprints.undip.ac.id/15857/1/Rully_Akbar.pdf diakses pada tanggal 10 Mei 2023.
Sri Soedewi Mascjhoen Sofwan, Beberapa Masalah Pelaksanaan Lembaga Jaminan Khususnya Fidusia di dalam Praktek dan Pelaksanaannya di Indonesia. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta,1977.
Suparman, Eman. Pilihan Forum Arbitrase dalam Sengketa Komersial untuk Penegakan Keadilan. Jakarta: Tatanusa, 2004.
Supianto. Hukum Jaminan Fidusia, Prinsip Publisitas Jaminan Fidusia. Jakarta: Garudhawaca, 2015.
Tobing, Rudyanti Dorotea. ”Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debitor Akibat Penarikan Barang Jaminan Dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen”, Jurnal Morality, Volume 2, Nomor 2 Desember 2015.
Witanto. Hukum Jamina Fidusia dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 el-Uqud: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.