The Urgency of Establishing Constitutional Court Procedural Law

Sugeng Riyadi; Muhammad Fauzan; Idamatussilmi Idamatussilmi; Asep Budiman

doi:10.24090/volksgeist.v6i2.9607

Authors

Sugeng Riyadi Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Indonesia
Muhammad Fauzan Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Indonesia
Idamatussilmi Idamatussilmi Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9998-129X
Asep Budiman Hunan Normal University, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i2.9607

Keywords:

Procedural Law; Constitutional Court Regulations; Constitutional Court.

Abstract

The formulation of procedural law within the constitutional court is a crucial requirement, as stipulated by Article 24 C paragraph (6) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. While the Constitutional Court Procedural Law is outlined in Law No. 24 of 2003 on the Constitutional Court, it merely provides general points. Special aspects, aligned with individual case characteristics, are deferred to the Constitutional Court for independent regulation based on Article 86 and the Explanatory Note to Law No. 24 of 2003. However, this delegation is inappropriate as procedural law should be governed by Law-level regulations, not by Constitutional Court Regulations (PMK). To date, the Constitutional Court continues to produce the Procedural Law in the form of PMKs. This study employs a normative juridical research method, with a statutory and conceptual approach, and conducts analysis in a qualitative descriptive manner. This paper concludes, firstly, that the creation of procedural law within the constitutional court holds philosophical, juridical and sociological significance. Secondly, the drafting process of the constitutional court’s procedural law must adhere to the process of forming sound laws and regulations and contain materials in line with their level as prescribed in the legislation.

References

A, I D. G. Palgunaa and Bima Kumara Dwi Atmaja. “‘Originalism’ of Interpretation in the United States Constitution.” Sriwijaya Law Review 7, no. 2 (2023): 190–208. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.2 134.pp190-208.

Arizona, Yance, Endra Wijaya, and Tanius Sebastian. Pancasila Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Kajian Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Berkaitan Dengan Perlindungan Kelompok Marjinal). Jakarta: Epistema Institute, 2014.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Perihal Undang-Undang Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2006.

Aswanto, and Wilma Silalahi. Perlindungan Penghormatan Dan Pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia Domestik Dan Internasional. Cetakan 1. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2021.

Griadhi, Ni Made Ari Yuliartini, and Anak Agung Sri Utari. “Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah.” Jurnal Kertha Patrika 33, no. 1 (2008): 1–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24843/KP.2008.v33.i01.p01.

Hakim, Muh Ridha. “Tafsir Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi / Interpretation Of Judicial Power Independence In Constitutional Court Decisions.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 7, no. 2 (July 2018): 279. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.2.2018.279-296.

Hariyanto, Hanif Fudin, Muhammad Fauzan, Kadar Pamuji, and Tedi Sudrajat. “The Communal Democracy of Yogyakarta Special Region’s Government on the Islamic Law Eclecticism Perspective.” AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 18, no. 1 (June 2023): 200–221. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v18i1.7403.

Jaelani, Abdul Kadir, Ahmad Dwi Nuryanto, Rakotoarisoa Maminirina Fenitra, M. Misbahul Mujib, and Resti Dian Luthviati. “Legal Protection of Employee Wage Rights in Bankrupt Companies: Evidence from China.” Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 31, no. 2 (August 2023): 202–23. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i2.25874.

Keptusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 01 /MKMK-SPL/II/2017 Tanggal 16 Februari 2017 (n.d.).

Keputusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 01/MKMK/X/2013 Tanggal 31 Oktober 2013 (n.d.).

Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. Meluruskan Arah Manajemen Kekuasan Kehakiman. Cetakan 1. Jakarta: Sekretariat Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 2018.

Konstitusi Afrika Selatan (n.d.).

Latif, Abdul. Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Negara Hukum Demokrasi. Cetakan 1. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Total Media, 2007.

Lestari, Diah Puji. “Analisis Yuridis Normatif Pemberian Kompensasi Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT) Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 3, no. 5 (2022). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v3i5.160.

Marzuki, Mahmud Peter. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup, 2017.

Notonagoro. Pancasila Dasar Falsafah Negara. Jakarta: Pantjuran Tujuh, 1974.

Nuraini, and Mhd Ansori. “Politik Hukum Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia.” Wajah Hukum 6, no. 2 (October 2022): 426. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v6i2.1075.

Palguna, I Dewa Gede. Pengaduan Konstitusional (Constitutional Complaint) Upaya Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak-Hak Konstitusi Warga Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.

Putusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 02/MKMK/L/11/2023 (n.d.).

Putusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 03/MKMK/L/11/2023 (n.d.).

Putusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 04/MKMK/L/11/2023 (n.d.).

Putusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 05/MKMK/L/11/2023 (n.d.).

Rahman, Faiz, and Agung Wicaksono. “Eksistensi Dan Karakteristik Putusan Bersyarat Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 13, no. 2 (2016): 348–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1326.

Riskiyono, Joko. “Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembentukan Perundang-Undangan Untuk Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan.” Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial 6, no. 2 (2015): 159–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46807/aspirasi.v6i2.511.

Risky, Saiful, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, and Mabarroh Azizah. “Political Configuration of Electoral System Law in Indonesia from State Administration Perspective.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi 6, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.7940.

Risnain, Muh. “Konsep Peningkatan Kuantitas Dan Kualitas Program Legislasi Nasional: Rekomendasi Konseptual Dan Kebijakan Pada Prolegnas 2015-2019.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 4, no. 3 (December 2015): 399. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v4i3.13.

Setya, Kartika Winkar, Abdul Aziz Nasihuddin, and Izawati Wook. “Fulfilling Communal Rights through the Implementation of the Second Principle of Pancasila towards the Regulation on Agrarian Reform.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi 6, no. 1 (June 2023): 89–102. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.7867.

Siahaan, Maruarar. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.

Simanjuntak, Supriardoyo, Ridho Alfaiz, and Melisa Ambarita. “Urgensi Perluasan Kewenangan MK Terhadap Constitutional Question Dan Constitutional Complaint Sebagai Wujud Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara.” Jurnal Legislatif 4, no. 2 (2021): 297–304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20956/jl.vi.14605.

Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singgkat. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2004.

Soeprapto, and Maria Farida Indrati. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan: Jenis, Fungsi Dan Materi Muatan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2007.

Soimin. Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Negara Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII-Press, 2010.

Suherman, Andi. “Implementasi Independensi Hakim Dalam Pelaksanaan Kekuasaan Kehakiman.” SIGn Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 1 (September 2019): 42–51. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i1.29.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (n.d.).

Utama, Rico Yodi Tri, and Retno Saraswati. “Independensi Dan Urgensi Restrukturisasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Berdasarkan Aspek Kekuasaan Kehakiman.” Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 1 (June 2021): 53–70. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v5i1.2740.

UU Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi (n.d.).

Yanti, Herma. “Gagasan Constitutional Complaint Sebagai Kewenangan Baru Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional.” Wajah Hukum 2, no. 2 (November 2018): 185. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v2i2.40.