Law and Post-Truth: Critical Constructivism as an Ideal Legal Reasoning Method on Indonesia's Post-Truth Era Society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v4i1.4202Keywords:
legal reasoning, post-truth, critical constructivismAbstract
This article aims to look at the current reality, which is marked by the proliferation of post-truth phenomena in the community, marking the many developments in the views and perspectives of each individual who considers something as an absolute truth by shifting the existence of facts, data. , and reality. This is the reality of challenges in the current era, so that in responding to the challenges posed by the post-truth era, scientific frameworks, including law as one of the main components that interact directly with society must try to avoid the formation of analyzes that lead to absolute truth. This article is the result of legal research using secondary legal materials. The results show that, critical constructivism as a method of reasoning that determines the process of legal reasoning, is able to prove its never-ending thought process by placing a gap between materialism and idealism, and its epistemological aspects provide a simultaneous relationship between empiricism and rationalism. The results of legal interpretation through the pattern of critical constructivism will continue to be criticized as long as the results of the interpretation cannot show the truth, this process will obtain an analysis result that will never lead to the absolute truth inherent in post-truth. world.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Alexander, Larry & Emily Sherwin, 2001, The Rule of Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law, Durham, Duke University Press.
---------, 2008, Demistifying Legal Reasoning, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Biesecker, Barbara A., Toward an Archaeogenealogy of Post-truth, Philosophy & Rhetoric, Vol. 51, No.4, 2018.
D’Ancona, Matthew, 2018, Post-Truth : The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back, London, Ebury Publishing.
Ehrlich, Eugen, 1936, Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law, Massasuchest, Harvard University Press.
Frankfurt, Harry G, 2005, On Bullshit, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Gie, The Liang, 1982, The Interrelationship of Science and Technology, Yogyakarta, Yayasan Studi Ilmu dan Teknologi.
Haryatmoko, Mencari Kebijakan di Era Post-truth: Menghadapi Hoaks, Emosi Sosial dan Populisme Agama, Majalah Basis, No. 5-6, Tahun ke-58, Februari 2020.
Hinkley, DV & Cox DR, 1974, Theoretical Statistics, Chicago, Chapman & Hall.
Hamilton, Sir William, 1860, Lectures on Metaphysics and Logic, in Two Volumes. Vol. II. Logic, Boston, Gould and Lincoln.
J.L, Kincheloe, 2005, Critical Constructivism Primer, New York, P. Lang.
McIntyre, Lee, 2018, Post-Truth, Massachusetts, MIT Press.
Peczenik, Aleksander, 1989, on Law and Reason, London, Springer Science & Business Media.
Rahardjo, Satjipto, 1985, Beberapa Pemikiran tentang Rancangan Antardisiplin dalam Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Bandung, Sinar Baru.
Shidarta, 2013, Hukum Penalaran dan Penalaran Hukum, Jakarta, Genta Publishing.
Sidharta, B. Arief, 2000, Refleksi tentang Struktur ilmu Hukum: Sebuah Penelitian tentang Fondasi Kefilsafatan dan Sifat Keilmuan Ilmu Hukum sebagai Landasan Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia, Bandung, Mandar Maju.
Vandevelde, Kenneth J., 1996, Thinking Like a Lawyer: An Introduction to Legal Reasoning, Colorado, Westview Press.
Verhak, C & Haryono Iman, 1991, Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan: Telaah atas Cara Kerja Ilmu-Ilmu, Jakarta, Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo, 2002, Hukum: Paradigma, Metode dan Dinamika Masalahnya, Jakarta, Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat (ELSAM) dan Perkumpulan untuk Pembaruan Hukum Berbasis Masyarakat dan Ekologi (HUMA).
Wuisman, J.J.J., 1996, Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Jilid I: Asas-Asas, Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.
---------, 2008, Demistifying Legal Reasoning, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Biesecker, Barbara A., Toward an Archaeogenealogy of Post-truth, Philosophy & Rhetoric, Vol. 51, No.4, 2018.
D’Ancona, Matthew, 2018, Post-Truth : The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back, London, Ebury Publishing.
Ehrlich, Eugen, 1936, Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law, Massasuchest, Harvard University Press.
Frankfurt, Harry G, 2005, On Bullshit, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Gie, The Liang, 1982, The Interrelationship of Science and Technology, Yogyakarta, Yayasan Studi Ilmu dan Teknologi.
Haryatmoko, Mencari Kebijakan di Era Post-truth: Menghadapi Hoaks, Emosi Sosial dan Populisme Agama, Majalah Basis, No. 5-6, Tahun ke-58, Februari 2020.
Hinkley, DV & Cox DR, 1974, Theoretical Statistics, Chicago, Chapman & Hall.
Hamilton, Sir William, 1860, Lectures on Metaphysics and Logic, in Two Volumes. Vol. II. Logic, Boston, Gould and Lincoln.
J.L, Kincheloe, 2005, Critical Constructivism Primer, New York, P. Lang.
McIntyre, Lee, 2018, Post-Truth, Massachusetts, MIT Press.
Peczenik, Aleksander, 1989, on Law and Reason, London, Springer Science & Business Media.
Rahardjo, Satjipto, 1985, Beberapa Pemikiran tentang Rancangan Antardisiplin dalam Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Bandung, Sinar Baru.
Shidarta, 2013, Hukum Penalaran dan Penalaran Hukum, Jakarta, Genta Publishing.
Sidharta, B. Arief, 2000, Refleksi tentang Struktur ilmu Hukum: Sebuah Penelitian tentang Fondasi Kefilsafatan dan Sifat Keilmuan Ilmu Hukum sebagai Landasan Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia, Bandung, Mandar Maju.
Vandevelde, Kenneth J., 1996, Thinking Like a Lawyer: An Introduction to Legal Reasoning, Colorado, Westview Press.
Verhak, C & Haryono Iman, 1991, Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan: Telaah atas Cara Kerja Ilmu-Ilmu, Jakarta, Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo, 2002, Hukum: Paradigma, Metode dan Dinamika Masalahnya, Jakarta, Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat (ELSAM) dan Perkumpulan untuk Pembaruan Hukum Berbasis Masyarakat dan Ekologi (HUMA).
Wuisman, J.J.J., 1996, Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Jilid I: Asas-Asas, Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
2021-06-04
How to Cite
Pardede, J. N., & Hugo Poluakan, P. (2021). Law and Post-Truth: Critical Constructivism as an Ideal Legal Reasoning Method on Indonesia’s Post-Truth Era Society. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v4i1.4202
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
