Akibat Hukum Surat Pertanggungjawaban Laporan Tahunan Yang Tidak Ditandatangani Oleh Seluruh Dewan Komisaris
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v3i2.4062Keywords:
Legal consequence, responsibility letter, annual reports.Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze how the legal consequences of the annual report accountability letter were not signed by the entire Board of Commissioners of a limited liability company by looking at the case of PT. Garuda Indonesia Tbk which occurred in 2019. Where in that case there was a rejection by 2 (two) Commissioners from PT. Garuda Indonesia Tbk to sign the annual report at the General Meeting of Shareholders. The nature of this research uses normative research, namely by reviewing laws and regulations, as well as company case reports. Based on this case, the function of company organs in charge of supervising a company is not going well. The case shows that this organ does not carry out its supervisory function in accordance with Article 108 of the Limited Liability Company Law. The legal consequence in this case is the imposition of fines on the organ of the company that signs the annual report. This is a consequence of the collegiality of the responsibility of the Board of Commissioners in a limited liability company.Downloads
References
Ishaq. “Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum.†Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008.
———. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008.
Karima, Nadia. “Tanggung Jawab Hukum Dewan Komisaris Dalam Penerapan Prinsip Good Corporate Governance Pada PT. Gapura Angkasa. Universitas Jenderal Soedirman,†2015.
Kurniawan. Hukum Perusahaan-Kharakteristik Badan Usaha Berbadan Hukum Dan Tidak Berbadan Hukum Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2014.
Mardiasmo. Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Solo: Penerbit Andi, 2009.
———. Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Solo: Penerbit Andi, 2009.
Martono, and D. Agus Hardjito. Manajemen Keuangan. Yogyakarta: Ekonisia, 2001.
Muhammad, Abdul Kadir. Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 1999.
Munawir. Analisa Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: Liberty, 2007.
Nasution, Bismar. Keterbukaan Dalam Pasar Modal. Jakarta: Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2001.
———. Keterbukaan Dalam Pasar Modal. Jakarta: Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2001.
Okezone. “Kronologi Kasus Laporan Keuangan Garuda Indonesia hingga Kena Sanksi : Okezone Economy.†https://economy.okezone.com/, June 28, 2019. https://economy.okezone.com/read/2019/06/28/320/2072245/kronologi-kasus-laporan-keuangan-garuda-indonesia-hingga-kena-sanksi.
Pipin Syarifin. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: CV. Pustaka Setia, 1999.
Saliman, Abdul R. Hukum Bisnis Untuk Perusahaan-Teori Dan Contoh Kasus. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2005.
Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamuji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. RajaGrafindo Persada: Jakarta, 2006.
Sutedi, Adrian. Buku Pintar Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta: Raih Asa Sukses, 2015.
Waluyo, Bambang. Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2002.
Wicaksono, Frans. Tanggungjawab Pemegang Saham, Direksi, Dan Komisaris Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta: Visimedia, 2009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.