Sejarah dan Perkembangan Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi

Authors

  • Hesti Widya Ningrum universitas bhayangkara jakarta raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1633

Keywords:

history, corporate responsibility, Indonesia

Abstract

Corporate criminal responsibility has a difference in its development between countries with the common law system and those with civil law system. This is also, no exception in Indonesia. Indonesia as a Dutch Colony, which adheres to the civil law system which carries the adagium "deliquere non potest university," where corporations cannot be convicted. By using a normative approach, this article discusses about corporation as subject of criminal law which regulated outside the Criminal Code (KUHP). In Pratice, there have been several cases that punish corporations who commit criminal acts such as corruption. The finding of this article is court in Indonesia, especially corruption court are more likely to use the doctrine of vicarious liability as in common law countries. Contrary, with the conception in the Draft Criminal Code (RKUHP) that is more likely to use identification doctrine on corporate responsibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aulia Pop, Anca. “Criminal Liability Of Corporations: A Comparative Jurisprudence”. Paper presented at Michigan State University College of Law, 2006.
Beni Mukti Setiyawan, Wahyu. “Pertanggungjawaban korporasidalam tindak pidana korporas.,”Jurnal Rechtstaat, Fakultas Hukum Surakarta. Volume 8 No. 1 Tahun 2014.
B. Diskant,Edward. “Comparative Corporate Criminal Liability: Exploring the Uniquely American Doctrine Through Comparative Criminal Procedure”. The Yale Law Journal, Connecticut, 2003.
Campbell Black,Henry.Black’s Law Dictionary Revised 4th Edition, (St. Paul: Minn West Publishing Co, 1968.
Donald,Lbn Toruan, Henry. “PertanggungJawaban Pidana Korporas.,” Jurnal RechtsVinding, BPHN. Volume 3 No. 3 Tahun 2014.
Engle,Eric.Ectraterritorial Corporate Criminal Liability: A Remedy For Human Rights Violations?. Tartu: University of Tartu Press, 2003.
H. Bucy, Pamela.“Why Punish? Trends in Corporate Criminal Prosecutions”. American Law Review 1287, 2007.
Johan Nasution, Bahder. Metode Penelitian Hukum.Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2008.
Kyriakakis,Joanna. “Corporate Criminal Liability and The ICC Statute: The Comparative Law Challange.” Netherlands International Law Review,LVI 333-336 ,TMC Asser Instituut and Contributors,2009.
Hariyanto, “Official Responsibility and Personal Responsibility in the Context of State Financial Loss,” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol 18, No 1 (2018)
Khanna, V.S.Corporate Criminal Liability: What Purpose Does It Serve?, 109 Harv. L.Rev. 1477, The Harvard Law Review Association, 1996.
ICJR, PertanggungJawaban Korporasi dalam Rangan KUHP, 2015
M.G., J.C.Oudijk, D.Schaffmeister, Faure. Kekhawatiran Masa Kini Pemikiran Mengenai Hukum Pidana Lingkungan Dalam Teori Dan Praktek. Bandung,Citra Aditya Bakti,1994. Penerjemah Tristam P.Moeliono.
Muladi dan Dwidja Priyanto,PertanggungJawaban Pidana Korporasi. Bandung: Kencana, 2010.
Nasution, Bismar. “Kejahatan Korporasi dan Pertanggungjawabannya”. Makalah yang disampaikan di Jajaran Kepolisian Daerah Sumatera Utara, Medan, 27 April 2006
Saputra, Rony. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Bentuk Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang merugikan Keuangan Negara terkait dengan Pasal 2 UU PTPK).”Jurnal Cita Hukum, UIN Jakarta. Vol. II No. 2, Desember 2015.
Septian Rumapea, Mazmur, dkk. “PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN KORPORASI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KEHUTANAN (Studi Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 2642 K/Pid/2006.”Jurnal Hukum USU, Volume 4 no. 2 Tahun 2016.
Remy Sjahdeini, Sutan. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Jakarta:PT.Grafiti Pers, 2007.
Reksodiputro,Mardjono. “Meninjau RUU Tentang Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana Dalam Konteks Perlindungan HAM.” Jurnal Keadilan Vol.2 No. 2 Tahun 2002.
Sun Beale,Sara “A Response To The Critics Of Corporate Criminal Liability”. Criminal Law Review 150, Duke Law School, 2009.
Timur Abimanyu. Persfektif Kejahatan Korporasi Dan Pertanggungan Jawaban Menurut UU No. 25 Tahun 2003 dan Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Serta Analisanya.
W. Tarun,Robert.Basic of The Foreign Corrupt Act, American Law Review: What Every General Councel, Transactional Lawyer, White Collar Criminal Lawyer Should Know, Chicago, 2006.
Wagner,Marcus. “Corporate Criminal Liability National and International Responses”. (Background Paper for International Society For The Reform Criminal Law 13th Conference Commercial and Financial Fraud: A Comparative Perspective, Malta, July 8-12 199.
FCPA, Final Settlements For Siemens, <http://www.fcpablog.com/blog/2008/12/16/final-settlements-for-siemens.html.>. Diakses pada tanggal 15 Maret 2018
NN,“PT Newmont Minahasa Pencemar Teluk Tuyat”,<http://pseudorechtspraak.wordpress.com/2012/04/06/pt-newmont-minahasa-raya-pencemar-teluk-buyat/>. diakses tanggal 12 mei 2018
Nov. “Korporasi Indosat dan IM2 jadi tersangka” http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt50e850c466441/korporasi-indosat-dan-im2-jadi-tersangka. 12 Mei 2018
The Enron Scandal, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enron_scandal.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-19

How to Cite

Ningrum, H. W. (2018). Sejarah dan Perkembangan Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 1(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v1i2.1633

Issue

Vol. 1 Issue 2 (2018) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi

Section

Articles

License

Copyright Notice

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.