Legal Policy of Disparity in Sentencing as a Ground for Judicial Review in Indonesia Corruption Cases

Authors

  • Prija Djatmika Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
  • Wahbi Rahman Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
  • Dwi Edi Wibowo Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan, Indonesia
  • Robert Lengkong Weku Universitas Khairun, Indonesia
  • Noor Dzuhaidah Osman Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.13287

Keywords:

Judicial review; sentencing disparity; judicial error; corruption.

Abstract

Article 263 paragraph (2) of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code limits the grounds on which a Judicial Review of a court decision may be filed. This limitation stems from the extraordinary nature of the Judicial Review, as it provides a mechanism to reopen a case that has obtained permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde). Errors in assessing the grounds for a Judicial Review can undermine the principles of legal certainty and justice, which are fundamental to the rule of law. This paper analyzes the use of sentencing disparity in corruption cases as a basis for Judicial Review, as recognized by the Supreme Court of Indonesia. The study employs a normative-descriptive research method. The findings indicate that sentencing disparity in corruption cases is multi-causal, suggesting that it does not always constitute a factual matter but may also involve legal considerations. The study concludes that determining sentencing disparity as an instance of judicial error in a Judicial Review must be conducted with due regard to the principle of judicial independence. Furthermore, with the issuance of Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2020 concerning Sentencing Guidelines under Articles 2 and 3 of the Corruption Eradication Law, issues of sentencing disparity should ideally be resolved through ordinary legal remedies such as appeals or cassation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Hamzah dan Irdan Dahlan. Upaya Hukum Dalam Perkara Pidana. Bina Aksara. Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 1984.

Andi Hamzah. KUHP Dan KUHAP Edisi Revisi. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2011.

Angeli, Danai, and Dia Anagnostou. “A Shortfall of Rights and Justice: Judicial Review of Immigration Detention in Greece.” European Journal of Legal Studies 2022, no. SpecialIssue (2022): 97–131. https://doi.org/10.2924/EJLS.2022.004.

Appellee, v. Kevin Joseph Fields. United States Of America,No. 16-1451 (2017).

Archives, Department of Justice. “He ‘Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How’ of Appeals in Bankruptcy Proceedings -- Standard of Review, Mootness, Etc.,” n.d.

Arif, Muladi and Barda Nawawi. Criminal Theories and Policies,. Bandung: Alumni, 1992.

Arsil, Hasril Hertanto, and Liza Farihah. Kertas Kebijakan, Pengurangan Arus Perkara Ke Mahkamah Agung. Edited by LeIP. LeIP. Jakarta: LeIP, 2017.

Arsil, Hasril Hertanto, and Liza Farihah. “Kerta Kebijakan Penguranan Arus Perkara Ke Mahkamah Agung,.” Jakarta, 2017.

Article 12 letter I of Law Number 31 Year 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption as amended by Law Number 20 Year 2001 on the Amendment to Law Number 31 Year 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption. (n.d.).

Article 12 letters e, g and f of Law Number 31 Year 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption as amended by Law Number 20 Year 2001 on the Amendment to Law Number 31 Year 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption. (n.d.).

Article 2 and Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 on the Amendment to Law Number 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption (n.d.).

“Article 5 Paragraph (1) Letters a and b, Article 5 Paragraph (2), Article 12 Letters a, b, c and d, Article 6 Paragraph 1 Letters a and b, Article 6 Paragraph 2, Article 11, Article 13 of Law Number 31 of 1999 Concerning the Eradication of the Crime of Co,” n.d.

Article 7 paragraph 1 letters a, b, c and d, Article 7 paragraph 2, article 12 letter h of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of the Criminal Acts of Corruption as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 c (n.d.).

Article 8, Article 9, Article 10 letters a, b and c of Law Number 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of the Crime of Corruption as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 on the Amendment to Law Number 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of the Crime of Corruption. (n.d.).

Asmarudin, Imam, Mohammad Fauzan, Abdul Aziz Nasihuddin, Riris Ardhanariswari, Hariyanto Hariyanto, and Bhanu Prakash Nunna. “Initiating the Reform of Principle Norms in the Formation of Laws in Indonesia.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 12, no. 2 (August 19, 2024): 208–26. https://doi.org/10.29303/IUS.V12I2.1390.

Azilia, Rizki Karina. “Juridical Review Of The Granting Of Remissions To Prisoners Of Criminal Acts Of Corruption.” Journal of Law Science 3, no. 4 (October 2021): 140–52. https://doi.org/10.35335/jls.v3i4.1683.

Bushway, Shawn D., and Anne Morrison Piehl. “Judging Judicial Discretion: Legal Factors and Racial Discrimination in Sentencing.” Law & Society Review 35, no. 4 (April 2001): 733–64. https://doi.org/10.2307/3185415.

Chakim, M. Lutfi. “Mewujudkan Keadilan Melalui Upaya Hukum Peninjauan Kembali Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 2 (2016): 328. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1227.

Chazawi, Adami. Lembaga Peninjauan Kembali (PK) Perkara Pidana: Penegakan Hukum Dalam Penyimpangan Praktik Dan Peradilan Sesat,. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.

Chesterman, Simon. “An International Rule of Law?” American Journal of Comparative Law 56, no. 2 (April 2008): 331–62. https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2007.0009.

Daniel Solomon, and Mary Calkins & Matt Hicks. “Identifying and Understanding Standards of Review.” Vol. 28. Center, 2019.

Darmawan, Ristu. “Pidana, Upaya Hukum Luar Biasa Peninjauan Kembali Terhadap Putusan Bebas Dalam Perkara.” Universitas Indonesia, 2012.

Garrett, B L. “Accuracy in Sentencing.” Southern California Law Review 87, no. 3 (2014): 499–544.

Gogitidze, Dar’ya. “Respect in Law: The Evolution of Normative Consolidation and Doctrinal Understanding.” Legal Science and Practice: Journal of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 1, no. 1 (March 2024): 158–67. https://doi.org/10.36511/2078-5356-2024-1-158-167.

Hamzani, Achmad Irwan, Tiyas Vika Widyastuti, Nur Khasanah, and Mohd Hazmi Mohd Rusli. “Implementation Approach in Legal Research.” International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences 13, no. 2 (June 2024): 380. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijaas.v13.i2.pp380-388.

Haynes, Jason. “The Death of Judicial Review of Sporting Bodies in the Commonwealth Caribbean.” The International Sports Law Journal 22, no. 1 (March 2022): 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-021-00196-w.

“In the Point of Consideration Letter b of Perma 1 of 2020, It Is Stated That in Order to Avoid Disparity in Cases That Have Similar Characteristics, It Is Necessary to Impose Punishment,” n.d.

Irawan, Benny, Firdaus, Belardo Prasetya Mega Jaya, A. H.Asari Taufiqurrohman, Siti Wulan Sari, and Sarah Furqoni. “State Responsibility and Strategy in Preventing and Protecting Indonesian Fisheries Crews Working on Foreign Fishing Vessels from Modern Slavery.” Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs, no. March (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2024.2333107.

Jaya, Belardo Prasetya Mega, Ridwan, Rully Syahrul Mucharom, Dwi Edi Wibowo, Siti Nur Aisah, Sulastri, and Novia Bella Alifvia. “Criticising the Implementation of the ACTIP in Southeast Asia.” Sriwijaya Law Review 7, no. 2 (2023): 350–67. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.2542.pp350-367.

Lilik Mulyadi (et.al). Urgensi Pedoman Pemidanaan Dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Keadilan Dan Kepastian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana-PrenadaMedia Group, 2019.

Litbang Mahkamah Agung. “Kedudukan Dan Relevansi Yurisprudensi Untuk Megurangi Dispartas Putusan Pengadilan.” Puslitbang Hukum Dan Peradilan Mahakamah Agung RI. Jakarta, 2010.

Litbang, Tim Pengkaji Pusat. “Problematika Penerimaan Peninjauan Kembali Dan Grasi Dalam Penegakan Hukum.” Puslitbang Kejagung RI. Jakarta, 2006.

Lucidi, Dimitri Lorenzani dan Federico. “The Economic Impact of Civil Justice Reform,” 2014.

Mega Jaya, Belardo Prasetya, Agus Prihartono Permana Sidiq, Mohamad Fasyehhudin, and Nuryati Solapari. “Republic of Indonesia Sovereign Right in North Natuna Sea According to United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982.” Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs 16, no. 1 (2024): 127–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2023.2206261.

Muhlizi, Arfan Faiz. “Memperebutkan Tafsir Peninjauan Kembali.” RechtsVinding Online, no. 3 (2015): 23–25.

Nemitz, Jan Christoph. “The Law of Sentencing in International Criminal Law: The Purposes of Sentencing and the Applicable Method for the Determination of the Sentence.” Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 4 (December 2001): 87–127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1389135900000830.

Oksana Shcherbanyuk, Vіtalii Gordieiev, And Laura Bzova. “Legal Nature of the Principle of Legal Certainty as a Component Element of the Rule of Law.” Juridical Tribune 13, no. 1 (March 2023). https://doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2023/13/1.02.

Ostapenko, Hanna. “Role of Legal Certainty in Providing Economic Security: Ukraine’s Experience.” Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields 14, no. 2 (December 2023): 215. https://doi.org/10.14505/tpref.v14.2(28).02.

Poerwanto, Hady, Joko Setiyono, and Sunardi. “Corruption as a Violation of Human Rights, Economic, Social and Cultural Human Rights Perspective.” International Journal of Law and Politics Studies 5, no. 1 (February 2023): 119–29. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijlps.2023.5.1.14.

Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Badan Litbang Diklat Kumdil Mahkamah Agung RI. Peninjauan Kembali Putusan Pidana Oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum (Penelitian Asas, Teori, Norma Dan Praktik Penerapannya Dalam Putusan Pengadilan). Edited by Badan Litbang Diklat Kumdil Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Badan Litb. Bogor: Badan Litbang Diklat Kumdil Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2012.

Răduleţu, Sebastian. “National Prosecutions as the Main Remedy in Cases of Massive Human Rights Violations: An Assessment of the Approach of the European Court of Human Rights.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 9, no. 3 (November 2015): 449–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijv024.

Rahman, Yogi Muhammad, Lalu Saipudin, AH. Asari Taufiqurrohman, Anik Kunantiyorini, and Taufiq. “Legal Protection for Investors against Fraud by Market Manipulation in the Indonesian Capital Market.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 12, no. 3 (2024): 517–29. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i3.1416.

Ridwan, Ridwan, Belardo Prasetya Mega Jaya, and Sarah Haderizqi Imani. “The Implementation of General Principles of Convention on The Rights of The Child During Covid-19 Pandemic in The City of Serang.” LAW REFORM 18, no. 1 (March 2022): 16–27. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v18i1.44643.

Rismana, Daud, Ali Maskur, Rifi Maria Laila Fitri Permonoputri, Hariyanto Hariyanto, and Hajar Salamah Salsabila Hariz. “The Legal Effectiveness of Juvenile Diversion: A Study of the Indonesian Juvenile Justice System.” Khazanah Hukum 7, no. 2 (June 21, 2025): 190–205. https://doi.org/10.15575/KH.V7I2.44162.

Sema Nomor 7 tahun 2012 tentang Rumusan Hukum Hasil Rapat Pleno Mahkamah Kamar Agung Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Bagi Pengadilan. (n.d.).

Siahaan, Maruarar. “Integrasi Konstitusional Kewenangan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Mahkamah Agung.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 4 (January 2021): 729–52. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1742.

Sime, Stuart. “49. Judicial Review.” In A Practical Approach to Civil Procedure, 564–74. Oxford University Press, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198873426.003.0049.

Supreme Court. Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 163 PK/Pid.Sus/2019 (n.d.).

Syarifuddin. Prinsip Keadilan Dalam Mengadili Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Edited by Kencana. Kencana. Jakarta: Kencana, 2020.

Syllabus. “Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal., 508 U.S. 602 (1993).,” 1993.

Watch, Indonesia Corruption. “Studi Atas Disparitas Putusan Pemidanaan Perkara TIndak Pidana Korupsi.” Indonesia Corruption Watch, 2014.

Yeung, Luciana L. “Bias, Insecurity and the Level of Trust in the Judiciary: The Case of Brazil.” Journal of Institutional Economics 15, no. 1 (February 2019): 163–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137417000625.

Yuratich, David. “10. An Introduction to Judicial Review.” In Public Law: Principles to Practice, 331–68. Oxford University Press, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780191881985.003.0010.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-29

How to Cite

Djatmika, P., Rahman, W., Wibowo, D. E., Weku, R. L., & Osman, N. D. (2025). Legal Policy of Disparity in Sentencing as a Ground for Judicial Review in Indonesia Corruption Cases. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 8(2), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.13287