Why Constitutional Courts Back Death Penalty? Insights from Indonesia and South Korea

Andy Omara; Faiz Rahman

doi:10.24090/volksgeist.v7i2.10773

Authors

Andy Omara Faculty of Law Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Faiz Rahman Leiden Law School, Universiteit Leiden, the Netherlands

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v7i2.10773

Keywords:

Constitutional court; death penalty; nonderogable rights.

Abstract

This article explores the paradoxical affirmation of the death penalty by the Constitutional Courts in Indonesia and South Korea, despite constitutional guarantees for the right to life and the fundamental right of human dignity. Through historical and content analyses, it explores how these courts interpret these rights in relation to the death penalty and why they affirm it constitutional. Both countries recognise the nonderogable nature of these rights, yet their Constitutional Courts allow for legal restrictions. Constitutional Court’s decision to impose limitations on nonderogable rights demonstrates their preference for maintaining a cautious and conservative approach. The examination of Constitutional Courts’ decisions reveals that the debate over the death penalty’s constitutionality extends beyond legal considerations, involving political dynamics and historical factors. This article underscores the complex interplay between constitutional guarantees, judicial interpretation, and sociopolitical contexts in shaping the countries’ human rights protection trajectories, especially in the context of nonderogable rights. It also highlights the crucial role of Constitutional Courts in safeguarding the right to life, as their decisions can significantly impact human rights protection in these countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ardhanariswari, Riris, Eko Nursetiawan, Syarafina Dyah Amalia, Enny Dwi Cahyani, and Rozlinda Mohamed Fadzil, “Upholding Judicial Independence Through the Practice of Judicial Activism in Constitutional Review: A Study by Constitutional Judges,” Volksgeist, 6, no. 2 (2023):183.https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i2.9565.

Bae, Sangmin. “International Norms, Domestic Politics, and the Death Penalty Comparing Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan.” Comparative Politics 44, no. 1 (2011): 41–58. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041510X13815229366525.

———. “South Korea’s De Facto Abolition of the Death Penalty.” Pacific Affairs 82, no. 3 (2009): 407–25.

Bessler, John. “Human Dignity and the Law’s Evolution: Prohibiting Capital Punishment through a Jus Cogens Norm.” In The Death Penalty’s Denial of Fundamental Human Rights: International Law, State Practice, and the Emerging Abolitionist Norm, 209–63. Cambridge University Press, 2022.

Butt, Simon. “Asia-Pacific Judicial Responses to the Death Penalty in Indonesia.” Alternative Law Journal 39, no. 2 (2014): 134–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X1403900215.

Cho, Byung Sun. “South Korea’s Changing Capital Punishment Policy: The Road from de Facto to Formal Abolition.” Punishment and Society 10, no. 2 (2008): 171–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474507087198.

———. “The Death Penalty in South Korea and Japan: ‘Asian Values’ and the Debate about Capital Punishment?” In Capital Punishment: Strategies for Abolition, edited by Peter Hodgkinson and William A. Schabas, 253–72. Cambridge University Press, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489273.011.

Cho, Kuk. “Death Penalty in Korea: From Unofficial Moratorium to Abolition?” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 3, no. 1 (2008): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0205.1090.

Choi, Eunsuhk, Shanhe Jiang, and Eric G. Lambert. “Reasons for South Korean Attitudes towards the Death Penalty: Exploring the Nexus between Strong Public Support and History of Misapplication.” International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 43, no. 1 (2019): 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2017.1391107.

Clarke, Ross. “Retrospectivity and the Constitutional Validity of the Bali Bombing and East Timor Trials.” Asian Law Journal 5 (2003): 1–32.

Constitutional Court of Korea. Decision No. 22-1(A) KCCR 36, 2008Hun-Ka23 (2010).

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Decision No. 2-3/PUU-V/2007 on the Review of Law No. 22 of 1997 on Narcotics (2007).

Farer, Tom. “The Hierarchy of Human Rights.” American University Law Review 8, no. 1 (1992): 115–19.

Hahm, Chaihark. “Constitutional Court of Korea: Guardian of the Constituton or Mouthpiece of the Government?” In Constitutional Courts in Asia: A Comparative Perspective, edited by Albert H. Y. Chen and Andrew Harding, 141–67. Cambridge University Press, 2018.

Hariyanto, Hariyanto. “Hubungan Kewenangan Antara Pemerintah Pusat Dan Pemerintah Daerah Berdasarkan Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi 3, no. 2 (December 29, 2020): 99–115. https://doi.org/10.24090/VOLKSGEIST.V3I2.4184.

Hsu, Jimmy Chia Shin. “Right to Life and Capital Punishment in Transnational Judicial Dialogue.” Asian Journal of Comparative Law 16, no. 2 (2021): 311–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2021.22.

Human Rights Committee. “International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - General Comment No. 36: Article 6 (Right to Life).” United Nations, 2018.

Huong, Yu Sin, and Ying Hooi Khoo. “Human Rights, State Sovereignty, and the Death Penalty: Indonesia’s Diplomacy Approach on Bali Nine.” Journal of International Studies 15, no. 1 (2019): 1–20.

Indrayana, Denny. “Indonesian Constitutional Reform 1999- 2000, An Evaluation of Constitutional Making in Transition.” Asia Law Review 5, no. 1 (2008): 65–101.

Kramer, Elisabeth, and Claudia Stoicescu. “An Uphill Battle: A Case Example of Government Policy and Activist Dissent on the Death Penalty for Drug-Related Offences in Indonesia.” International Journal of Drug Policy 92 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103265.

Lago, Yuber, Fajar Sugianto, and Syofyan Hadi. “Death Penalty in Indonesia Legal System: Fallibility and the Commitment to International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.” Technium Social Sciences Journal 52 (2023): 113–28.

Lasser, Mitchel de S.-O.-l’E. Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Transparency and Legitimacy. Oxford University Press, 2009.

Lee, Dong Heub. “Development and Current Situation of the Constitutional Adjudication in Korea.” Seoul Law Journal 53, no. 2 (2012): 1–39.

Lee, Kyungyeoi. “Judicial Murder: The Argument for the Abolition of the Death Penalty Law.” Comparative Criminal Law Research 17, no. 4 (2015): 139–72.

Lee, Whiejin. “The Enforcement of Human Rights Treaties in Korean Courts.” In Asian Yearbook of International Law, edited by Seokwoo Lee and Hee Eun Lee, 95–136. Brill, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004415829.

Leechaianan, Yingyos, and Dennis Longmire. “The Use of the Death Penalty for Drug Trafficking in the United States, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand: A Comparative Legal Analysis.” Laws 2, no. 2 (2013): 115–49. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws2020115.

Lynch, Colman. “Indonesia’s Use of Capital Punishment for Drug-Trafficking Crimes: Legal Obligations, Extralegal Factors, and the Bali Nine Case.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 40, no. 2 (2009): 523–93.

Mahfud MD, Moh. “Politik Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 7, no. 14 (2000): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol7.iss14.art1.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Laporan Tahunan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2006.

McRae, Dave. “A Key Domino? Indonesia’s Death Penalty Politics.” Lowy Institute for International Policy, 2012.

———. “Indonesian Capital Punishment in Comparative Perspective.” Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde 173, no. 1 (2017): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17301002.

Nopriandi, Tedy, and Risky Fany Ardhiansyah. “Paradigm of Death Penalty (Comparative Study in Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and China).” Lampung Journal of International Law 2, no. 1 (2020): 57–68. https://doi.org/10.25041/lajil.v2i1.2032.

Novak, Andrew. “The Future of the Mandatory Death Penalty in Malaysia and Singapore: ‘Asian Values’ and Abolition in Comparative Perspective, with Implications for Indonesia.” The Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law 1 (2014): 303–13.

Pascoe, Daniel. “Three Coming Legal Challenges to Indonesia’s Death Penalty Regime.” Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law 2, no. 2 (2015): 239–80.

Purba, Nelvitia, Ali Mukti Tanjung, Sri Sulistyawati, Rudy Pramono, and Agus Purwanto. “Death Penalty and Human Rights in Indonesia.” International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 9 (2020): 1356–62. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.156.

Rifai, Eddy. “An Analysis of the Death Penalty in Indonesia Criminal Law.” Sriwijaya Law Review 1, no. 2 (2017): 190–99. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol1.Iss2.44.pp191-200.

Salam, Abdul Jalil, and Zahlul Pasha Karim. “Death Penalty in Indonesia: Revisiting the Debate Between the Retentionist and the Abolitionist.” Lentera Hukum 8, no. 1 (2021): 115–50. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v8i1.20138.

Simandjuntak, Deasy. “Spectacle of the Scaffold? The Politics of Death Penalty in Indonesia.” ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute 46 (2015).

Teraya, Koji. “Emerging Hierarchy in International Human Rights and Beyond: From the Perspective of Non-Derogable Rights.” European Journal of International Law 12, no. 5 (2001): 917–41.

Tim Penyusun Naskah Komprehensif. Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945: Latar Belakang, Proses, Dan Hasil Pembahasan 1999-2002 – Buku VI Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Edisi Revisi). Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2008.

———. Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945: Latar Belakang, Proses, Dan Hasil Pembahasan 1999-2002 – Buku VIII Warga Negara Dan Penduduk, Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Agama (Edisi Revisi). Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2010.

Woo-hyun, Shim. “Constitutional Court Begins Third Review of Death Penalty.” The Korea Herald, July 2022.