Digital Labour Platformer’s Legal Status and Decent Working Conditions: European Union and Indonesian Perspective

Rofi Aulia Rahman; József Hajdú; Valentino Nathanael

doi:10.24090/volksgeist.v7i1.10366

Authors

Rofi Aulia Rahman Faculty of Law, Universitas Surabaya, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7245-9457
József Hajdú Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Szeged, Hungary
Valentino Nathanael Faculty of Law, Universitas Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v7i1.10366

Keywords:

Algorithmic management; improving working condition; reclassification of platform work; self-employed.

Abstract

This article aims to provide the recent court decision on legal status and working conditions for the gig worker in European Union as well as a lesson for Indonesia through the EU’s notion on gig workers. The European Union (EU) Commission enacted in 2021 a draft Directive proposal to ensure Europe's gig (platform) workers enjoy the same labour rights as other traditional employees. This article employs doctrinal legal research with statutory and comparative approach, as well as court decision are considered as the main basis to protect gig workers. The result shows that the drafts Directive to ensure Europe’s gig workers is relied on Articles 16 and 153 (1)(b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU), on data protection and working conditions, respectively. It has the advantage of giving certainty about the minimum requirements and procedural obligations that Member States must apply in platform work relations. Courts of several EU MSs, including Belgium, France, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and the UK, already ruled in favour of platform workers not qualifying as self-employed, obliging platforms to reclassify them as employees. Meanwhile, Indonesia's perspective on gig workers remains vague, and the minimal standards for gig workers are unbalanced in comparison to the EU's perspective on gig workers. This article introduces the main notions and provisions of the proposed EU platform work Directive and analyses the current conditions and legal framework of Indonesia in handling the issue of gig workers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altenried, Moritz. “Mobile Workers, Contingent Labour: Migration, the Gig Economy and the Multiplication of Labour.” Environment and Planning A 56, no. 4 (2021): 1113–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X211054846

Arany, László, and Péter András Popovics. “Az Új Típusú Munkavállalás: A Platform Gazdaság És A Platform Munka Sajátosságai.” International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences 9 (January 2024): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21791/ijems.2024.005

Baiocco, Sara, Enrique Fernandez Macías, Uma Rani, and Annarosa Pesole. “The Algorithmic Management of Work and Its Implications in Different Contexts,” 2022. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/documents/publication/wcms_849220.pdf.

Basalisco, Bruno, Gerdis Marquardt, and Morten May Hansen. “Study of the Value of Flexible Work for Local Delivery Couriers.” Https://Copenhageneconomics.Com/Publication/Study-of-the-Value-of-Flexible-Work-for-Local-Delivery-Couriers/, 2021.

Bertolini, Alessio, Oğuz Alyanak, Callum Cant, Tatiana López, Pablo Agüera, Kelle Howson, and Mark Graham. “Fairwork Response to the European Commission’s Proposal for a Directive on Platform Work.” Https://Fair.Work/En/Fw/Blog/Fairwork-Response-to-the-European-Commissions-Proposal-for-a-Directive-on-Platform-Work/, December 2021.

Black, Celeste M. “The Future of Work: The Gig Economy and Pressures on the Tax System.” Canadian Tax Journal 68, no. 1 (2020): 69–97. https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2020.68.1.sym.black

Cheng, Mingming, and Carmel Foley. “Algorithmic Management: The Case of Airbnb.” International Journal of Hospitality Management 83 (October 2019): 33–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.04.009

Cherry, Miriam A. “Employment Status for ‘Essential Workers’: The Case for Gig Worker Parity.” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 55, no. 2 (2022).

Commission, European. “Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Improving Working Conditions in Platform Work,” 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=24992&langId=en.

———. “Questions and Answers Questions and Answers: Improving Working Conditions in Platform Work,” 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/api/files/document/print/en/qanda_21_6606/QANDA_21_6606_EN.pdf.

Congregado, Emilio, María Isabel De Andrés, Eimear Nolan, and Concepción Román. “Heterogeneity Among Self-Employed Digital Platform Workers: Evidence from Europe.” International Review of Entrepreneurship 20, no. 1 (2022): 45–68.

Danaher, John. “The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation.” Philosophy and Technology 29, no. 3 (2016): 245–68.

Debruyne, Nicholas L. “Uber Drivers: A Disputed Employment Relationship in Light of the Sharing Economy.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 92, no. 1 (2017): 289–315. https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreviewhttps://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol92/iss1/11.

Duggan, James, Ultan Sherman, Ronan Carbery, and Anthony McDonnell. “Algorithmic Management and App-Work in the Gig Economy: A Research Agenda for Employment Relations and HRM.” Human Resource Management Journal 30, no. 1 (January 2020): 114–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12258

Euronews. “Uber Loses Court Battle over Whether Its Drivers Are Permanent Employees.” Https://Www.Euronews.Com/2021/09/13/Uber-Loses-Court-Battle-over-Whether-Its-Drivers-Are-Permanent-Employees, September 2021.

Fredman, Sandra, Darcy Du Toit, Mark Graham, Cherupara Aradhana Vadekkethil, Gautam Bhatia, and Alessio Bertolini. “International Regulation of Platform Labor A Proposal for Action.” Weizenbaum Journal of the Digital Society 1, no. 1 (2021): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.34669/WI.WJDS/1.1.4

Glasner, Benjamin. “The Minimum Wage, Self-Employment, and the Online Gig Economy.” Journal of Labor Economics 41, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1086/719690

Gundert, Stefanie, and Janine Leschke. “Challenges and Potentials of Evaluating Platform Work Against Established Job-Quality Measures.” Economic and Industrial Democracy, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X231199891

Heeks, Richard, Mark Graham, Paul Mungai, Jean Paul Van Belle, and Jamie Woodcock. “Systematic Evaluation of Gig Work Against Decent Work Standards: The Development and Application of the Fairwork Framework.” Information Society 37, no. 5 (2021): 267–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2021.1942356

Johan, Suwinto, and Luo Yuan Yuan. “What Does Financial Institution Termination of Employment Mean in Terms of Labor Law?” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi 6, no. 1 (January 2023): 49–59. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.6372

Katsnelson, Laura, Felix Oberholzer-Gee, and Harvard Business School. “Being the Boss: Gig Workers’ Value of Flexible Work,” 2021. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=60255.

Kellogg, Katherine C., Melissa A. Valentine, and Angèle Christin. “Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control.” Academy of Management Annals 14, no. 1 (January 2020): 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174

Kusumaningtyas, Reza Octavia, Rahayu Subekti, Abdul Kadir Jaelani, Asron Orsantinutsakul, and Utkarsh K. Mishra. “Reduction of Digitalization Policy in Indonesian MSMEs and Implications for Sharia Economic Development.” Juris: Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah 21, no. 2 (2022): 157–71. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v21i2.6855

Langer, Markus, and Cornelius J. König. “Introducing a Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Opacity, Transparency and Strategies to Reduce Opacity in Algorithm-Based Human Resource Management.” Human Resource Management Review 33, no. 1 (March 2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100881

Liang, Chen, Jing Peng, Yili Hong, and Bin Gu. “The Hidden Costs and Benefits of Monitoring in the Gig Economy.” Information Systems Research 34, no. 1 (March 2023): 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1130

Liboreiro, Jorge. “New EU Rules Could Turn 4.1 Million Gig Workers into Regular Employees.” Https://Www.Euronews.Com/My-Europe/2021/12/09/New-Eu-Rules-Could-Turn-4-1-Million-Gig-Workers-into-Regular-Employees, December 2021.

Lomas, Natasha. “Europe Lays Out A Plan to Flip the Odds on Gig Economy Exploitation.” Https://Techcrunch.Com/2021/12/09/Eu-Gig-Economy-Proposal/?Guccounter=1, December 2021.

Meaker, Morgan. “The Gig Economy’s Days in Europe Are Numbered.” Https://Www.Wired.Com/Story/Gig-Economy-European-Commission-Law/, December 2021.

Meijerink, Jeroen, and Tanya Bondarouk. “The Duality of Algorithmic Management: Toward a Research Agenda on HRM Algorithms, Autonomy and Value Creation.” Human Resource Management Review 33, no. 1 (March 2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100876

Mittelstadt, Brent Daniel, Patrick Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Sandra Wachter, and Luciano Floridi. “The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate.” Big Data and Society 3, no. 2 (December 2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679.

Naumowicz, Kamila. “Some Remarks to the Legal Status of Platform Workers in the Light of the Latest European Jurisprudence.” Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej 28, no. 3 (2021): 177–89. https://doi.org/10.4467/25444654spp.21.016.13962

Newlands, Gemma. “Algorithmic Surveillance in the Gig Economy: The Organization of Work through Lefebvrian Conceived Space.” Organization Studies 42, no. 5 (May 2021): 719–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620937900

Purificato, Ilaria. “The Position of Collective Rights in the ‘Platform Work’ Directive Proposal: Commission v Parliament.” Hungarian Labour Law 1 (2023). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/procedure/EN/2021_414.

Rachmawati, Riani, Luthfianti Zakia, Ayu Lupita, Alex De Ruyter, and Alex De Ruyter is Professor. “Urban Gig Workers in Indonesia during COVID-19: The Experience of Online ‘Ojek’ Drivers.” Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation 15, no. 1 (2021): 31–45.

Remeikienė, Rita, Ligita Gasparėnienė, and Romas Lazutka. “Working Conditions of Platform Workers in New EU Member States: Motives, Working Environment and Legal Regulations.” Economics & Sociology 15, no. 4 (2022): 186–203. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071.

Ruyter, Alex De, and Riani Rachmawati. “Understanding the Working Conditions of Gig Workers and Decent Work: Evidence from Indonesia’s Online Ojek Riders.” Sozialpolitik.Ch, no. 2/2020 (December 2020). https://doi.org/10.18753/2297-8224-159

Sari, Norma. “Accelerating Business Law Dynamization through Proposed Amendments to Indonesian Consumer Protection Law.” Jurnal Hukum Novelty 14, no. 1 (2023): 88–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v14i1.a25945

Schuetz, Sebastian, and Viswanath Venkatesh. “Research Perspectives: The Rise of Human Machines: How Cognitive Computing Systems Challenge Assumptions of User-System Interaction.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 21, no. 2 (2020): 460–82. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00608

Stefano, Valerio De. “The Rise of the ‘Just-in-Time Workforce’: On-Demand Work, Crowdwork and Labour Protection in the Gig-Economy.” Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 37, no. 3 (2015): 471–504. www.ilo.org/publns.

Sukma, Fajar, and Zulheldi Zulheldi. “Government Policies in Economic Empowerment of Muslim Communities in the Digital Economy Era.” El-Mashlahah 11, no. 2 (December 23, 2021): 146–63. https://doi.org/10.23971/elma.v11i2.3108

Tan, David. “A Brave New Frontier in the Dichotomous Indonesian Labour Law: Gig Economy, Platform Paradox and Workers without Employers.” Mimbar Hukum 33, no. 1 (2021): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.22146/mh.v33i1.1956

Tarafdar, Monideepa, Xinru Page, and Marco Marabelli. “Algorithms as Co-Workers: Human Algorithm Role Interactions in Algorithmic Work.” Information Systems Journal 33, no. 2 (March 2023): 232–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12389

Wood, Alex J., Mark Graham, Vili Lehdonvirta, and Isis Hjorth. “Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy.” Work, Employment and Society 33, no. 1 (February 2019): 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616

Xu, Y., and D. Liu. “Decent Work for the Digital Platform Workers: A Preliminary Survey in Beijing.” Digital Law Journal 2, no. 1 (April 2021): 48–63. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2021-2-1-48-63