Religious Court Decisions Regarding the Revocation of Grant (Hibah) in the Perspective of Islamic Jurisprudence

Purnama Hidayah Harahap; Asmuni; Akmaluddin Syahputra; Ahmad Rezy Meidina; Anwar Zein

doi:10.24090/mnh.v17i2.9767

Authors

Purnama Hidayah Harahap UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan
Asmuni UIN Sumatera Utara
Akmaluddin Syahputra UIN Sumatera Utara
Ahmad Rezy Meidina STAI An-Nur Banyumas
Anwar Zein Bartin University Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v17i2.9767

Keywords:

Revocation of Grants, Judicial Rulings, Islamic Jurisprudence

Abstract

This scholarly article examines the judgments rendered by Religious Courts concerning disputes related to the revocation of grants, employing the viewpoint of Islamic jurisprudence and the maslahah theory. In this instance, the judicial panel overseeing the dispute related to the cancellation of the grant primarily invoked the provisions outlined in Article 35, Paragraph 1, and Article 36, Paragraph 1 of the Marriage Act (Law Number 1 of 1974), which pertain to joint property, along with Article 1338 of the Civil Code, addressing agreements. Consequently, the judges disregarded the article pertaining to the right to withdraw the grant’s subject, even though the grant is given without the consent of the other heirs. Meanwhile, in accordance with the maslahah theory, decisions rendered by a panel of judges in the Religious Court ideally aim to actualize the concept of Maqasid al-Shari’ah, specifically focused on the preservation of both property and descendants. This approach helps mitigate adverse consequences that may arise within familial dynamics, particularly in relationships between parents and their heirs. Nevertheless, in accordance with Hans Kelsen’s justice theory, the deliberations undertaken by judges when adjudicating cases involving the revocation of grants often exhibit inconsistency in the application of the pertinent legal framework, thereby leading to a partial realization of the intended concept of justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abduh, Muhamad, and Tutik Hamidah. “Tinjauan Mashlahah Imam Al-Ghazali Terhadap Taklik Talak Dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia.” Diktum: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 19, no. 2 (2021): 133–48.

Abdullah, Abdullah. “The Legal Impact of Islamic Law in the Identity and Provisions of Qatari Legal System: Conceptual Frame and Legislative Directions.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 58, no. 2 (2020): 451–82.

Adhani, Oktaviana, and Bagiyo Atmaja. “Keabsahan Pembatalan Hibah Akibat Pemberi Hibah Jatuh Miskin.” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) 6, no. 1 (2020): 95–103.

Alexander, Ongky. “Efektivitas Pembagian Harta Gono-Gini Pasca Perceraian Dalam Persfektif Yuridis Sosiologis.” El-Ghiroh: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 16, no. 01 (2019): 113–29.

Ali, H Zainuddin. Filsafat Hukum. Sinar Grafika, 2023.

Amin, M Nur Kholis Al. “Hibah Orang Tua kepada Anak sebagai Pengganti Ahli Waris (Telaah Hermeneutika Terhadap Pasal 211 Kompilasi Hukum Islam).” Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 6, no. 1 (2016): 29–44.

Anshori, Abdul Ghofur. Filsafat Hukum Hibah Dan Wasiat Di Indonesia. UGM-Press, 2018.

Bashori, Dhofir Catur, and Miftahul Ichsan. “Pembatalan Hibah Oleh Pengadilan Agama.” HAKAM: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Ekonomi Islam 5, no. 1 (2021).

Budify, Alyatama, Jelitamon Ayu Lestari Manurung, and Satria Braja Hariandja. “Pembatalan Akta Hibah Di Pengadilan Negeri Pematangsiantar: Kajian Putusan Nomor 33/Pdt. G/2019/PN. Pms.” SIGn Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 1 (2020): 72–85.

Gaffar, Abdul, M Ali Rusdi, and Akbar Akbar. “Kedewasaan Usia Perkawinan Perspektif Hadis Nabi Muhammad Dengan Pendekatan Interkoneksitas Maslahah.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 15, no. 1 (2021): 83–98.

Hannifa, Vaula Surya, Johni Najwan, and M Amin Qodri. “Hak Waris Anak Angkat Dalam Perspektif Kompilasi Hukum Islam Indonesia.” Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law 3, no. 1 (2022): 34–48.

Hariyanto, Budi. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pembagian Harta Waris Beda Agama Menurut Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Perdata (KUH Perdata) Dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI).” IUS: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum 8, no. 2 (2020): 28–42.

Hidayat, Asep Dadang, Mulyadi Mulyadi, Senki Nurachmadi, N Irfan, and Aufa Aufa. “Pembatalan Akta Hibah dalam Perspektif Imam Madzhab.” Al-Mashlahah Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial 10, no. 001 (2022): 51–64.

Indonesia, Undang-Undang. Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 Tentang Peradilan Agama, 2006.

Indriyani, Irma. “Pengaruh Aliran Hukum Positivisme Dan Rasa Keadilan Di Indonesia.” Ahkam 1, no. 1 (2022): 193–204.

Juliansyahzen, Muhammad Iqbal. “The Contemporary Maqāṣid Sharia Perspective on Sexual Violence Provisions in the Indonesian Law Number 12 Year 2022.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 2022, 269–86.

Mu’minin, Muhammad Shofwanul. “Konflik Keluarga Akibat Pembagian ‘Harta Waris’ Dengan Hibah Perspektif Kompilasi Hukum Islam.” Sakina: Journal of Family Studies 4, no. 3 (2020).

Nugroho, Sigit Sapto, and M SH. Sukma Hukum Keadilan Berhati Nurani. uwais inspirasi indonesia, 2019.

Over, Implications Of Marad Al-Mawt, and Hibah Agreement. “Implikasi Marad Al-Mawt Ke Atas Akad Hibah.” Journal of Contemporary Islamic Law 5, no. 2 (2020): 22–28.

Perkara, Sistem Aplikasi Penelusuran. Putusan Pengadilan Agama Kisaran No.955/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Kis, 2023.

Rahim, Nasrullah Abdul, Muhammad Amar Adly, and Akmaluddin Syahputra. “Studi Pandangan Hakim Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Medan Terhadap Fatwa MUI Sumut Tentang Istbat Talak Di Luar Sidang Pengadilan Agama.” Al-Mashlahah Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial 10, no. 01 (2022): 239–56.

Rifenta, Fadlih, and Tonny Ilham Prayogo. “Nilai Keadilan Dalam Sistem Kewarisan Islam.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 13, no. 1 (2019): 111–27.

Riwanto, Agus. “Mengembangkan Paradigma Sistem Hukum dari Positivisme ke Konstruktivisme,” n.d.

Saputra, Julfan, Sri Sudiarti, and Asmaul Husna. “Konsep Al-‘Ariyah, Al-Qardh Dan Al-Hibah.” Al-Sharf: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam 2, no. 1 (2021): 19–34.

Saripah, Ipah, and Ila Nurmila. “Hukum Hibah ‘Umra Menurut Imam Malik Dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Pasal 1666.” Istinbath| Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Islam 14, no. 2 (2020): 149–90.

Sarmo, Sarmo. “Hukum Perubahan Status Harta Benda Wakaf: Studi Kasus Perubahan Status Kepemilikan Tanah Wakaf Di Desa Keniten Kecamatan Kedungbanteng Kabupaten Banyumas.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 14, no. 2 (2020): 239–50.

Sharif, Nur Safina Mohd, and Noor Lizza Mohamed Said. “Maqasid Syariah Dalam Keharusan Hibah Ruqba.” Journal of Contemporary Islamic Law 7, no. 2 (2022): 96–105.

Sulasina, Serli, Teki Prasetyo Sulaksono, and Yuli Kurniasih. “Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 267 K/Ag/2018 Tentang Sengketa Hibah Harta Bersama Dalam Perkawinan.” SOCIAL PEDAGOGY: Journal of Social Science Education 1, no. 2 (2020): 137–49.

Syaifudin, Endra. “Pandangan Islam Tentang Penghibah Yang Mencabut Kembali Hibahnya Dari Penerima Hibah.” Warna Warni Gagasan, n.d., 64.

Syarofit, Miqdarul Khoir, and Anisatun Nur Laili. “Hukum Hibah Tanah Untuk Gereja Persepektif Empat Mazhab.” JOSH: Journal of Sharia 1, no. 1 (2022): 1–11.

Zahra, Siti Fatimatu. “Tinjauan Hukum Gugatan Pembatalan Hibah Dari Ayah Kepada Anak (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Makassar Nomor 6/Pdt. G/2015/Pta. Mks),” 2021.

Zayyadi, Ahmad. “Dinamika Modernisasi Hukum Islam: Tinjauan Historis Dalam Pembacaan Mazhab Sociological Jurisprudence.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 14, no. 1 (2020): 99–112.