Reinventing the Human Dignity in Islamic Law Discourse: The Wasatiyah Approaches from Khaled Abou El-Fadl to the Interreligious Relation

Authors

  • Wildani Hefni Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
  • Rizqa Ahmadi Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung
  • Imam Mustofa Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v16i2.6928

Keywords:

Human dignity, Islamic law, Khaled Abou El-Fadl, inter-religious relation

Abstract

Violence in the name of religion has never completely disappeared from discourse on religious life. Surprisingly, Islamic law is used as the basis for committing acts of violence damaging interreligious relations. There is a gap between the goals of Islamic law and practice in society. This article aims to unpack the wasatiyah approach provided by Khaled Abou El-Fadl in Islamic law discourses. This research is a qualitative method using library research, which obtains information from books, articles, and journals. This research concludes that El-Fadl provides an essential concept known in contemporary Islamic law as al-wasatiyah by integrating various scientific disciplines to strengthen human dignity. El-Fadl offers a moderate-humanist approach as a system that is considered more holistic and comprehensive in Islamic law, especially in constructing texts, understanding the context, and optimizing legal reasoning based on maqasid al-shariah through independent reasoning. This article shows that El-Fadl allows greetings to non-Muslims, greetings of Christmas to non-Muslims, interacts with non-Muslims, and elects non-muslim leaders. El-Fadl believes in strengthening the theological basis of pluralism, which requires tolerance as a pathway for creating a mutually productive life together.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, Amin. “Intersubjektifitas Keberagamaan Manusia: Membangun Budaya Damai Antar Peradaban Manusia Melalui Pendekatan Fenomenologi Agama.” Dalam Filsafat dan Bahasa dalam Islam, 40. Yogyakarta: Lemlit, 2006.

Abu Abdilla, Muhammad bin Abi Bakr bin Ayyub bin Qayyim al-Jauziyah. Ahkam Ahli Dzimmah. Damman: Ramada li al-Nasyr, 1997.

Abu Ishaq Ibrahim al-Shatibi. Al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Shariah. Beirut: Dar al-Ma’rifat, t.t.

Ahmad, Rumadi. Fatwa Hubungan Antaragama di Indonesia: Kajian Kritis tentang Karakteristik, Praktis, dan Implikasinya. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2016.

Ahmadi, Rizqa. “Kontestasi atas Otoritas Teks Suci Islam di Era Disrupsi: Bagaimana Kelas Menengah Muslim Indonesia Memperlakukan Hadis melalui Media Baru.” Jurnal Studi Agama dan Masyarakat 15, no. 1 (26 Juni 2019): 22–35. https://doi.org/10.23971/jsam.v15i1.1138.

Al-Qaradhawi, Yusuf. Fiqh al-Wasaṭiyah al-Islamiyah wa al-Tajdid: Maʻalim wa Manarat. Cairo: Dār al-Syuruq, 2010.

Anderson, Norman. “Islamic Law Today the Background to Islamic Fundamentalism.” Arab Law Quarterly 2, no. 4 (1987): 339–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/3381605.

El Fadl, Khaled Abou. “Islamic Law and Muslim Minorities: The Juristic Discourse on Muslim Minorities from the Second/Eighth to the Eleventh/Seventeenth Centuries.” Islamic Law and Society 1, no. 2 (1994): 141–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/3399332.

———. Rebellion and Violence in Islamic Law. 1 ed. Cambridge University Press, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511560163.

———. Speaking in God’s Name: Islamic Law, Authority and Women. Repr. Oxford: Oneworld, 2010.

———. The Place of Tolerance in Islam. Boston: Beacon Press, 2002.

———. The Search for Beauty in Islam: A Conference of the Books. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.

———. Great Theft, Wrestling Islam From The Extremists. Harper San Fransisco: Harper Collins Publisher, 2005.

Hedges, Paul. Understanding Religion: Theories and Methods for Studying Religiously Diverse Societies. 1 ed. University of California Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1h1vbz6.

Hefni, Wildani. “Moderasi Beragama Dalam Ruang Digital: Studi Pengarusutamaan Moderasi Beragama Di Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri.” Jurnal Bimas Islam 13, no. 1 (21 Juli 2020): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.37302/jbi.v13i1.182.

Husain bin Ali al-Thuri al-Qadiri, Muhammad. Takmilah al-Bahr al-Raiq Syarh Kanz al-Daqaiq. Beirut: Darul Kutul Al-Ilmiyah, 1997.

Ibrahim, Ahmed Fekry. Pragmatism in Islamic Law: A Social and Intellectual History. Disunting oleh Peter Gran. Syracuse University Press, 2015. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1j1nsn6.

Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. “Methodological Issues in Islamic Jurisprudence.” Arab Law Quarterly 11, no. 1 (1996): 3–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/3381731.

Layish, Aharon. “Islamic Law in the Modern World: Nationalization, Islamization, Reinstatement.” Islamic Law and Society 21, no. 3 (2014): 276–307.

Litonjua, M. D. “Contending Ideologies: Liberal Democracy and Religious Fundamentalism.” International Review of Modern Sociology 44, no. 1/2 (2018): 23–49.

M. Kholid, Syeirasi. Wasatiyah Islam: Anatomi, Narasi dan Kontestasi Gerakan Islam. Bekasi: Alif, 2020.

Mahatsi. “Hermeneutika Humanistik (Studi Pemikiran Hermeneutik M. Amien Abdullah Dan Khaled Abou El Fadl).” Jurnal Penelitian Agama, VOL.XVII, NO. 3 September-Desember 2008, 1 Desember 2008.

Matswah, Akrimi. “Hermeneutika Negosiatif Khaled M. Abou El Fadl terhadap Hadis Nabi.” ADDIN 7, no. 2 (14 November 2015). https://doi.org/10.21043/addin.v7i2.578.

Muslim, Sahih. Kitab al-Salam, Bab al-Nahy’ an Ibtida’ Ahl Kitab, No. 2167, t.t.

Nasrullah, Nasrullah. “Hermeneutika Otoritatif Khaled M. Abou El Fadl: Metode Kritik Atas Penafsiran Otoritarianisme Dalam Pemikiran Islam.” HUNAFA: Jurnal Studia Islamika 5, no. 2 (15 Agustus 2008): 137–50. https://doi.org/10.24239/jsi.v5i2.160.137-150.

Rohmanu, Abid. “Khaled Abou El-Fadl Dan Orientasi Humanistik Dalam Studi Fiqh.” Justicia Islamica: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial 8, no. 2 (2011). https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v8i2.531.

Roshandel, Jalil, dan Sharon Chadha. Jihad and International Security. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780312376130.

Sanaky, Hujair A. H. “Gagasan Khaled Abou El Fadl Tentang Problem Otoritarianisme Tafsir Agama Pendekatan Hermeneutik Dalam Studi Fatwa-Fatwa Keagamaan.” Al-Mawarid: Jurnal Hukum Islam 14 (2005). https://journal.uii.ac.id/JHI/article/view/2818.

Schuurman, Bart, dan Max Taylor. “Reconsidering Radicalization: Fanaticism and the Link Between Ideas and Violence.” Perspectives on Terrorism 12, no. 1 (2018): 3–22.

Shah, Sayed Sikandar. “Homicide in Islam: Major Legal Themes.” Arab Law Quarterly 14, no. 2 (1999): 159–68.

Taimiya, Ibnu. Iqtidha al-Shirat al-Mustaqim Mukhalafa al-Ashab al-Jahim. Riyadh: Dar Ishbiliya, 1998.

Thahir, A. Halil. “Dari Nalar Literalis-Normatif Menuju Nalar Kontekstualis-Historis Dalam Studi Islam.” Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 5, no. 1 (1 September 2010): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2010.5.1.1-14.

Wijaya, Aksin. Dari Membela Tuhan ke Membela Manusia: Kritik atas Nalar Agamaisasi Kekerasan. Bandung: Mizan, 2018.

Downloads

Published

25-11-2022

How to Cite

Hefni, W. ., Ahmadi, R., & Mustofa, I. (2022). Reinventing the Human Dignity in Islamic Law Discourse: The Wasatiyah Approaches from Khaled Abou El-Fadl to the Interreligious Relation. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 16(2), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v16i2.6928

Issue

Section

ARTICLES
Share |