Interfaith Marriage in Perspectives of Classical and Modern Scholars
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v16i2.6772Keywords:
Paradigms, Clerical Thinking, Interfaith MarriageAbstract
Interfaith marriage has been a polemic in Islam since the Quran and hadith do not clearly explain the marriage that is allowed to ahl al-kitab and how to distinguish between Ahl al-Kitab and polytheistic. Also, it differs infidel, polytheistic, Ahl al-Kitab, Majusi, Sabi’i and others. The debate over this term among scholars continues until they agree to categorize those people into Ahl al-Kitab, polytheistic, majusi and others. This research uses a qualitative method with a normative approach in which the researchers use books, journals and other scientific manuscripts as the main resources. In addition, the researchers did a survey and found several things: First, the paradigm differences of scholars regarding interfaith marriage are based on differences understanding in Quran and hadith, socio-cultural influences and methods used. Secondly, the clerics agreed to forbid a Muslim to marry a disbeliever and polytheistic, but allowed to marry women Ahl al-Kitab. Third, Scholars differ in classifying ahl al-kitab women infidel, polytheistic, ṣabi’i and Ahl al-Kitab.References
Achmad Warson Munawir. “Al-Munawir Kamus Arab-Indonesia.” Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents 5, no. 2 (2014).
al-Ashqalani, Ibn Hajar. Fath Al-Baari Syarah Shahih Al-Bukhari. Jakarta: Pustaka Azam, 2007.
al-Jassas, Abu Bakar Amad bin Ali al-Razi. Ahkam Al-Qur’an. Vol. 2. Beirut: Daar al-Kutub al-Ilmiah, n.d.
al-Jaziry, Abdurrahman. Kitab Al-Fiqh ‘ala Madzahib Al-‘Arba’Ah. Vol. Juz IV. Beirut: Daar al-Kutub al-Ilmiah, 1991.
Ali, Atabik, and Amad Zuhdy Muhdhar. Kamus Al-’Ashry. Jakarta: Multi Karya Grafika, n.d.
Amir, Rahma. “Perkawinan Beda Agama Di Indonesia Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam 6, no. 1 (June 2019): 99. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.v6i1.9482.
ar-Razi, Muhammad Fakhruddin. Tafsir Mafatih Al-Ghaib. Beirut: Daar al-Fikr, 1995.
Arief, Abdul Salam. Pembaharuan Pemikiran Hukum Islam Antara Fakta Dan Realita. Yogyakarta: LESFI, 2003.
asy-Syaukani, Muhammad ibn Ali ibn Muhammad. Fath Al-Qadir Juz II. Beirut: Daar al-Ma’rifah, n.d.
at-Thabari, Abu Ja’far Muhammad ibn Jarir. Tafsir Ath-Thabari. Beirut: Daar al-Fikr, n.d.
az-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh Al-Islami Wa Adillatuhu. Beirut: Daar al-Fikr al-Mu’ashir, n.d.
Az-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Tafsir Al-Munir. Gema Insani. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2018.
Bakar, Alyasa Abu. Perkawinan Muslim Dengan Non Muslim. Banda Aceh: Dinas Syariat Islam NAD, 2008.
Budiarti, Budiarti. “Analisis Yuridis Perkawinan Beda Agama Dengan Pendekatan Maqashid Al-Syariah Dalam Konteks Negara Hukum Pancasila.” Justicia Islamica 15, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v15i1.1362.
Cahaya, Nur. “Perkawinan Beda Agama Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Hukum Islam 18, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.24014/hi.v18i2.4973.
Efendi, Roni. “Perkawinan Beda Agama Dalam Paradigma Sosiological Jurisprudence.” Al Hurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam 5, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.30983/alhurriyah.v5i1.2396.
Farghali, Abdul Hafidz, and Hamzah al-Nasyraty. Silsilah Al-Fiqh Al-Islami ‘Ala Madzahib Al-Arba’Ah. Vol. Juz V. Qahirah: Maktabah al-Qaimah, n.d.
Fitrawati, Fitrawati. “Diskursus Perkawinan Beda Agama Di Indonesia Dalam Tinjauan Universalisme Ham Dan Relativisme Budaya.” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 20, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v20i1.2825.
Haitoni, Faisal. “Komparasi Penafsiran Ayat-Ayat Pernikahan Beda Agama.” TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin 17, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v17i2.71.
Hasan, M. Ali. Masail Fiqhiyyah Al-Haditsah Pada Masalah-Masalah Kontemporer Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1998.
Hasyim, Muh Fathoni, A. W. Liliek Channa, and Moh Mufid. “The Walagara Marriage Ritual the Negotiation between Islamic Law and Custom in Tengger.” Journal of Indonesian Islam 14, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2020.14.1.139-162.
Ibad, Mifatakhul Bil. “Perkawinan Beda Agama Perspektif Majelis Ulama Indonesia Dan Muhammadiyah.” AL-HUKAMA’ 9, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2019.9.1.195-230.
Ibnu Rusyd. Bidayah Al-Mujtahid Wa Nihayah Al-Muqtasid. Vol. 2. Beirut: Daar al-Fikr, 2008.
Ikhwan, M., and Anton Jamal. “Diskursus Hukum Islam Dalam Konteks Keindonesiaan: Memahami Kembali Nilai-Nilai Substantif Agama.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 15, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v15i1.4689.
Junaidi & M. Martindo Merta. “Perkawinan Beda AgamaDan Akibat Hukum Kewarisan Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Prosiding ISID, 2020.
Karim, Ramlan, and Nova Efenty Mohammad. “Penetapan Hukum Nurcholish Majid Dan Mustofa Ali Yaqub Tentang Pernikahan Beda Agama.” AS-SYAMS 1, no. 1 (2020): 102–20.
Katsir, Ismail Ibn. Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-Adzim. Qahirah: Daar Mishr Li Thaba’ah, 2000.
Mu’in, F. “Analisis Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia Dan Undang-Undang Tentang Perkawinan Beda Agama.” Nizham Journal of Islamic Studies 7, no. 01 (2019): 91–105.
Nasution, Hamdan. “Analisis Atas Keabsahan Perkawinan Beda Agama.” Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum Dan Masyarakat 19, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v19i1.1909.
Qardhawi, Yusuf. Fatwa - Fatwa Kontemporer Jilid I. Gema Insani Press. Vol. Jilid I. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 2016.
———. Halal Haram Dalam Islam. Era Intermedia, 2003.
Ridha, Muhammad Rasyid. Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-Hakim (Tafsir Al-Manar). Beirut: Daar al-Fikr, n.d.
Sabiq, Sayyid. Fiqh Sunnah Jilid II. 1st ed. Jakarta: Pena Pundi Aksara, 2006.
Saputra, Eko, and Busyro. “Kawin Maupah: An Obligation to Get Married after Talak Tiga in the Tradition of Binjai Village in Pasaman District a Maqâsid Al- Sharî’ah Review.” Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies, 2018. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v6i2.3738.
Shihab, M. Quraish. Tafsir Al-Mishbah Pesan, Kesan Dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an. Lentera Hati. Vol. 3. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2015.
———. Wawsan Al-Qur’an: Tafsir Tematik Atas Pelbagai Persoalan Umat. Mizan. Bandung: Mizan, 2012.
Sirry, Mun’im A (ed.). Fiqih Lintas Agama: Membangun Masyarakat Inklusif-Pluralis. Jakarta: Paramadina, 2004.
Suhasti, Ermi, Siti Djazimah, and Hartini. “Polemics on Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia between Rules and Practices.” Al-Jami’ah 56, no. 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2018.562.367-394.
Susilo Surahman. “Perkawinan Beda Agama Itu Boleh (?).” Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani 2, no. 4 (April 2022): 1711–20. https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v2i4.290.
Syarifuddin, Amir. Ushul Fiqh. Jakarta: Kencana, 2012.
Turnip, Ibnu Radwan Siddik. “Perkawinan Beda Agama: Perspektif Ulama Tafsir, Fatwa MUI Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam Di Indonesia.” Al-Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 6, no. 1 (2021).
Utomo, Setiawan Budi, and Abu Hanifah. Fiqih Aktual: Jawaban Tuntas Masalah Kontemporer. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 2003.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Asy'ari Asy'ari, Triansyah Fisa
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).