The Dichotomy Between Tabarru’ and Mu’âwaḍah Contracts: Perspective of Indonesian Law of Obligation

Authors

  • Jamal Abdul Aziz UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto
  • Uus Uswatusolihah UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v16i1.6426

Keywords:

dichotomy, contract, tabarru’, mu'âwaḍah

Abstract

Among many divisions of contract (‘aqd) in mu’âmalah shar’iyyah, the dichotomy between tabarru’ and mu’âwaḍah contracts is the most influential paradigm in getting to know the jungle of classical and contemporary mu’âmalah contracts. Tabarru’ contract (tabarru’ât) means contracts of virtue as if it should be free from material self-interest or any other profane benefit. Meanwhile, mu’âwaḍah contract (mu’âwaḍât) means business contracts as if it is laden with material calculation and other various forms of self-interest. The dichotomic paradigm of these contracts is quite urgent that it is often made the ground to determine whether or not some material benefit obtained from certain contracts is allowed. It is interesting to observe, that the Indonesian law of obligation which is originating from a Dutch colonial legacy actually also acknowledges such a contract. It is, however, not as strict as its divisions in Islamic fiqh.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-‘Imrani. Abd Allah Ibn Muhammad Ibn ‘Abd Allah. Al-‘Uqud Al-Murakkabah: Dirasah Fiqhiyyah Ta`siliyyah Wa Tatbiqiyyah. Riyad: Dar Kunuz Isybiliya, 2010.

Al-Hasyimi. “Sultan Ibn Ibrahim Ibn Sultan. Ahkam Tasarrufat Al-Wakil Fi ‘Uqud Al-Mu’Awadat Al-Maliyyah. Dubai: Dar Al-Buhus Li Al-Dirasat Al-Islamiyyah Wa Ihya` Al-Turas,” 2002.

Al-Hasyimi, Sultan ibn Ibrahim ibn Sultan. Ahkam Tasarrufat Al-Wakil Fi ‘Uqud Al-Mu’Awadat Al-Maliyyah. Dubai: Dar al-Buhus li al-Dirasat al-Islamiyyah wa Ihya` al-Turas, 2002.

Al-Misri, Rafiq Yunus. Al-Jami’ Fi Usul Al-Riba. Damaskus-Beirut: Dar al-Qalam – al-Dar al-Syamiyyah, 1991.

Al-Sanhuri. Nazariyyah Al-‘Aqd. Cet. 2. Vol. I. Beirut: Mansyurat al-Halabi al-Huquqiyyah, 1998.

Al-Zarqa`, Mustafa Ahmad Al-Fiqh al-Islami fi Thawbih al-Jadid. Al-Fiqh Al-Islami Fi Thawbih Al-Jadid: Al-Madkhal Al-Fiqhi Al-‘Amm Jilid I. Damaskus: Ali Ba` al-Adib, 1968.

Astuti, Yuyun Dwi. “Tinjauan Hukum Islam Terhadap Ujrah Pada Pembiayaan Dana Talangan Haji (Studi Kasus Pada Bank Syariah Mandiri KCP Purbalingga.” In Skripsi Tidak Diterbitkan. Jurusan Syariah STAIN Purwokerto, 2012.

Aziz, Jamal Abdul. Akad Gabungan Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perikatan Islam, Laporan Penelitian Tidak Diterbitkan. Purwokerto: P3M STAIN Purwkerto, 2012.

Badran, Badran Abu ‘Aynayn. Tarikh Al-Fiqh Al-Islami Wa Nazariyyah Al-Milkiyyah Wa Al-‘Uqud. Beirut: Dar al-Nahdah al-‘Arabiyyah, n.d.

Justinaih, Hannan bintu Muhammad Husayn. Aqsam Al-‘Uqud Fi Al-Fiqh Al-Islami. Makkah al-Mukarramah: Universitas Ummul Qura, 1998.

Muljadi, Kartini dan Gunawan Widjaja. Perikatan Pada Umumnya. Jakarta: P.T. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2003.

Sammahi, Khalid. “Al-Nazariyyah Al-‘Ammah Li ‘Uqud Al-Tabarru’at: Dirasah Muqaranah.” In Disertasi Tidak Diterbitkan. Tilimsan: Universitas Abu Bakar Balqayid, 2012.

Subekti. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa, 1992.

Taymiyyah, Ibnu. Majmu’ Al-Fatawa. Translated by tahqiq: ‘Abd al-Rahman ibn Muhammad ibn Qasim. Madinah: Majma’ al-Malik Fahd li Tiba’ah al-Mushaf al-Syarif, 1995.

Downloads

Published

30-05-2022

How to Cite

Aziz, J. A., & Uswatusolihah, U. (2022). The Dichotomy Between Tabarru’ and Mu’âwaḍah Contracts: Perspective of Indonesian Law of Obligation. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 16(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v16i1.6426

Issue

Section

ARTICLES
Share |