Putusan Serta Merta dalam Perkara Hadhanah di Pengadilan Agama dalam Rangka Perlindungan Anak

Authors

  • Asni Asni UIN Alauddin Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v15i1.4115

Keywords:

Child Custody, Problematic, Legal Strategy, Child Protection, Community Welfare

Abstract

Child custody cases processed in the Religious Court often cause certain problems. Therefore, a special strategy is needed by the judge in resolving child custody cases. This paper describes the opportunities for implementing decisions immediately as one of the strategies that can be taken by judges in resolving child custody cases in the Religious Court. A decision immediately is a decision that can be immediately executed even if the opposing party submits legal action. Methodologically, this study uses normative legal research so that it applies a juridical normative approach. The research was conducted by adapting a literature study combined with interviews with Religious Court judges. The results of the study confirm that a decision immediately is one of the strategies that a judge can take if in a case it is feared that the losing party will make negative efforts that can harm the winning party. However, the most important consideration for the judge in this matter is for the best interest of the child and the realization of the benefit of society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Manan. Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2008.

Ahmad, Zulfa. “Perlindungan Anak Dalam Perspektif Islam.” Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2014. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2009.4.1.143-153.

Allen, Harris. “Unpacking Court Divorce Decrees, Children’s Outcomes, and Three Unconfounded Determinants: An Evidence-Based Look.” Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, Vol. 55, No. 3, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2014.887376.

Aris, Aris, and Fikri Fikri. “Hak Perempuan Dalam Pengasuhan Anak Pasca Perceraian.” Al-Maiyyah : Media Transformasi Gender Dalam Paradigma Sosial Keagamaan, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2017. https://doi.org/10.35905/almaiyyah.v10i1.449.

Azzis, Nadia Murshida Abd, and Alias Azhar. “Pendekatan Mediasi Dalam Tuntutan Hadanah: Kajian Di Mahkamah Tinggi Syariah Pulau Pinang.” International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, Vol. 3, No. 8, 2018.

Braver, Sanford L., Ira Mark Ellman, Ashley M. Votruba, and William V. Fabricius. “Lay Judgments About Child Custody After Divorce.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023194.

Callow, Ella, Munazza Tahir, and Maurice Feldman. “Judicial Reliance on Parental IQ in Appellate-Level Child Welfare Cases Involving Parents with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.” In Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12296.

Efendi, Zulfan. “Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Hak Asuh Anak (Hadhanah) Terhadap Isteri Yang Murtad Dalam Perkara Nomor: 398/P.Dt.G/2013/PA.Pbr Di Pengadilan Agama Pekanbaru).” Teraju: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2020. https://doi.org/10.35961/teraju.v2i01.62.

Farida Prihatini, Abdul Karim, Delila Stefanya, and Ali Sumihar. “The Problem of The Execution of Child Custody (Ḥaḍānah) Decision by The Religious Courts in Indonesia.” Jurnal Syariah, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2019.

Harahap, M. Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata, cet. 14. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.

Huzaimah, Arne. “Problematika Penyelesaian Perkara Hadhanah.” Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Masyarakat, Vol. 13, No. 1 , 2013.

Ihwanudin, Nandang. “Pemenuhan Kewajiban Pasca Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama.” Adliya: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemanusiaan, Vol. 10., No. 1, 2016. https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v10i1.5146.

Jauhari, Imam. “Penetapan Teori Tahkim Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Anak (Hadlanah) Di Luar Pengadilan Menurut Hukum Islam.” Asy-Syir’ah, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2011.

Khairuddin, Khairuddin, Badri Badri, and Nurul Auliyana. “Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Putusan Nafkah Pasca Perceraian (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Syar’iyah Aceh Nomor 01/Pdt.G/2019/MS.Aceh).” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2020. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v3i2.7700.

Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia, Inpres Nomor 1 Tahun 1991.

Nessa, Rum. Membumikan Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2016.

Nurjanah, Siti. “Keberpihakan Hukum Islam Terhadap Perlindungan Anak.” Al-’Adalah, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2017. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v14i2.2905.

Putra, Muhammad Amin. “Eksistensi Lembaga Negara Dalam Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia.” Fiat Justisia, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2016. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v9no3.600.

Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia (SEMA) Nomor Nomor 3 2000 tentang Putusan Serta Merta (Uitvoerbaar Bij Vooraad) dan Provisionil.

Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia (SEMA) Nomor 4 Tahun 2001 tentang Permasalahan Serta Merta (Uitvoerbaar Bij Voorraad) dan Provisionil.

Undang-undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak.

Undang-undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.

Undang-undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Sabiq, al-Syaikh Sayyid. Fiqh Al-Sunnah. Jilid III. Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah, 2009.

Saeidi, Masumeh, Maryam Ajilian, Hamid Farhangi, and Gholam Hasan Khodaei. “Rights of Children and Parents in Holy Quran.” International Journal of Pediatrics, Vol. 2, No. 3-2, 2014. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijp.2014.3462.

Whitehead, Denise L. “Divorcing Parenting from Child Support: Justice and Care in the Discourse of the Rights and Responsibilities of Shared Custody.” Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice about Men as Fathers, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3149/fth.1802.147.

Downloads

Published

11-06-2021

How to Cite

Asni, A. (2021). Putusan Serta Merta dalam Perkara Hadhanah di Pengadilan Agama dalam Rangka Perlindungan Anak. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 15(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v15i1.4115

Issue

Section

ARTICLES
Share |